Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Stephen. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Stephen. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Năm, 9 tháng 5, 2013

Atheist Stephen Hawking and Church of Scotland both determined to demonize Israel

  • hawking.jpg

    Physicist Stephen Hawking is boycotting a conference in Israel because he disagrees with the nation's policies. (AP)

I was looking forward to hearing the iconic Stephen Hawking,  the internationally renowned English theoretical physicist as he helped celebrate Shimon Peres’ 90th birthday at next month’s annual “Facing Tomorrow” Presidential Conference in Jerusalem.

The conference gathers the world’s top leaders and intellectuals for discussions on everything from science and technology to religion and politics. Past attendees have included former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, Google founder Sergei Brin, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales.

And what a great choice it was. To hear from a man who has continued to make his indelible mark on the world despite suffering from a debilitating form of the neuro-degenerative disease ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease) that has left him completely paralyzed.  

It's interesting that Hawking, who is a principled atheist, has some kindred souls among theologians of the Church of Scotland.

Indeed, some of the technologies that have served as Hawking’s lifeline to the world were developed by INTEL, a company with deep roots in Israel.

But it won’t happen. 

After agreeing to deliver the coveted keynote in Jerusalem, the highly unorthodox Hawking, who has visited Israel four times, has caved to the prevailing virulent anti-Israel orthodoxy among the United Kingdom’s elite and announced he’ll boycott because of Palestinian protests.

It's interesting that Hawking, who is a principled atheist, has some kindred souls among theologians of the Church of Scotland.

In their spiritual wisdom, the Church will vote on a report next week entitled: “The Inheritance of Abraham? A Report on the ‘Promised Land.’”

It questions the notion that the Bible "supports an essentially Jewish state of Israel." The report alleges that "increasing number of difficulties and current Israeli policies regarding the Palestinians,” and challenges this viewpoint.

"Possession of any land is clearly conditional,” we are told. “The question that arises is this: Would the Jewish people today have a fairer claim to the land if they dealt justly with the Palestinians?"

Biblical promises about the land of Israel were never intended to be taken literally, or as applying to a defined geographical territory, the report argues.

Instead, it said: "They are a way of speaking about how to live under God so that justice and peace reign, the weak and poor are protected, the stranger is included, and all have a share in the community and a contribution to make to it.

"The 'promised land' in the Bible is not a place, so much as a metaphor of how things ought to be among the people of God. This 'promised land' can be found -- or built -- anywhere.

"The desire of many in the state of Israel to acquire the land of Palestine for the Jewish people is wrong. The fact that the land is currently being taken by settlement expansion, the separation barrier, house clearance, theft and force makes it doubly wrong to seek biblical sanction for this."

"There is guilt among Western Christianity about centuries of anti-Semitism that led to discrimination against the Jews, culminating in the total evil of the Holocaust," it noted with the clear implication that Israeli crimes cancel out earlier Christian sins.

Israel’s behavior "raises particular questions for the Church of Scotland as we seek to respond to the question: "What does the Lord require of you…?"

The paper leaves little to imagination as to how Church members should respond: Demonize and de-legitimize the Jewish State and her Zionist supporters.

Ephraim Borowski, director of the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities, responded for Jews everywhere: "It reads like an Inquisition-era polemic against Jews and Judaism. It is biased, weak on sources, and contradictory. The picture it paints of both Judaism and Israel is barely even a caricature. The arrogance of telling the Jewish people how to interpret Jewish texts and Jewish theology is breathtaking.

"If the church cannot build bridges, can it at least refrain from burning them?"

Apparently not. 

The founders of the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement's pious but poisonous call to demonize one nation—the Jewish State of Israel,  have wrought a miracle of sorts—throwing together Church Elders with the world’s most famous atheist, Stephen Hawking. 

Too bad this miracle won’t help a single Palestinian, but will further fan the embers of the world’s oldest hatred: anti-Semitism.

Rabbi Abraham Cooper is associate Dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. Follow the Simon Wiesenthal Center on Facebook and on Twitter.


View the original article here

Stephen Colbert blasts NC barbecue as 'sauceless, vinegar-based meat product'

  • colbertbbq.jpg

    Colbert called North Carolina barbecue "sauceless, vinegar-based meat product."

Losing would made anyone bitter.  But to go after the barbecue -- well, that's sacred.

Disappointed that South Carolina voters did not elect his sister to Congress, Stephen Colbert, host of Comedy Central's "Colbert Report" instead blasted North Carolina's barbecue as "sauceless, vinegar-based meat product."

Elizabeth Colbert-Busch lost to disgraced former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford in Tuesday’s congressional special election. Colbert, who grew up in Charleston, S.C., said he felt betrayed, so he was "going to turn my back on South Carolina.” 

He said he'd become a North Carolinian and give up his home state's barbecue tradition.

His first act of defiance was to choke down North Carolina barbecue. 

"Instead I now officially love North Carolina's sauceless, vinegar-based meat product that they call barbecue." 

He then downs a bottle of South Carolina mustard barbecue sauce. 

Now, messing with a person's barbecue is serious business.  

Pitmaster Greg Hatem, owner of The Pit in Raleigh, N.C. said for 350 years North Carolina has been perfecting the art of cooking a whole pig.  "If you don’t know how to cook good pork, you cover with sauce," he said.

In North Carolina, there are generally two forms of barbecue: Eastern style and Western or Lexington style.

Eastern style is pork meat, hand pulled, cooked with a vinegar-based sauce and a hint of heat. Western or Lexington style uses a sauce with a base of ketchup and vinegar, and a hint of sugar.

There's no telling which style Colbert was eating, but fans of North Carolina's barbecue were none too pleased, anyway. 

On Comedy Central's Facebook page one user wrote: "Screw you, Colbert! You have mocked the sacred name of Tar Heel, and you have mocked the one true form of Barbeque. Return to whence you came -- you deserve to be represented by a charlatan like Sanford."

Another user wrote: "Stephen Colbert wouldn't know good barbecue if it came up and slapped him in the mouth. NC barbecue rules!"

Hatem invited Colbert to go to Raleigh and try "real Eastern pork barbecue" done to perfection. "He won’t need any sauce because he can pick it off the pig," he said.

Whether Colbert will take him up on the offer is anyone's guess.

Here's a look Colbert's barbecue rip: 


View the original article here

Stephen Hawking's double standard

  • hawking.jpg

    Physicist Stephen Hawking is boycotting a conference in Israel because he disagrees with the nation's policies. (AP)

When I first read that the preeminent physicist, Stephen Hawking, had joined the boycott of Israeli academics, I thought to myself, “good for him.”

After all, it’s unsurprising that such an intellectual giant and general inspiration to mankind would be a man of great principle. 

If he believes a people are being mistreated, he will not sit idly and ignore the situation; he will bravely join the forces of the just to combat the unjust.

With the exception of his Israel boycott, I could not find any instances of Mr. Hawking boycotting or even speaking out against other nations in the Middle East.

At the same time, I became curious about what other boycotts Mr. Hawking is currently participating in. Now, I understand that although he is a scientist, he is by no means a political scientist, so I couldn’t expect him to be familiar with the suffering of every last group, tribe or clan in on the planet. 

But since Mr. Hawking does seem to keep current on events in the Middle East, I thought it would be fair to assume he had boycotted other countries in the region that are also guilty of bad behavior.

Surprisingly, with the exception of his Israel boycott, I could not find any instances of Mr. Hawking boycotting or even speaking out against other nations in the Middle East. 

This is quite curious when you consider how pervasive government sanctioned human rights violations are throughout this region.

But fine, Mr. Hawking has no responsibility to monitor the suffering of the entire Middle East; it’s really just the suffering of Palestinians that he’s concerned with. And it’s no secret that the current governing administrations in the Palestinian territories have an atrocious human rights record, with the persecution of gays, religious minorities and women among its leading offenses.

So I was even more surprised to find that not only hasn’t Mr. Hawking boycotted Palestinian academics, he actively consulted with them prior to deciding to joining the boycott of Israeli academics.

Ultimately, however, there is still no denying that Mr. Hawking is a principled man. If you happen to be a straight Palestinian male of the Muslim faith who openly supports his government, Mr. Hawking will always have your back.

Mendy Finkel is an attorney and frequent political commentator. 


View the original article here