Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn economic. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn economic. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Tư, 15 tháng 5, 2013

Military spending is not right way to boost America's economic security

  • Pentagon Aerial View, 640x360

That Washington is holding defense cuts responsible for slow economic growth is a specious argument at best. War spending is unproductive and inflationary. Modern defense costs are capital intensive, not labor intensive, making the industry inefficient as a job creator.  

The defense industry has a presence in congressional districts across this country, so cuts affect every member. But every district in the U.S. has pressing infrastructure, education, health and environmental needs, and the return on the taxpayer’s dollar is much higher when invested on these areas.

Instead of concentrating money on capital intensive, military hardware purposed for destruction, and causing long term economic drain, our very limited and valuable economic resources should be invested in building the true strength and capacity of our economy, our nation, and her people.

In prioritizing military spending, Congress is cutting the very programs that can actually strengthen our economy.

During the heightened banking crisis in 2009, Rep. James Oberstar, then Chair of House Transportation Committee, called for a massive Eisenhower-level of investment in transportation infrastructure. He was right.

The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that the U.S. requires $3.6 trillion in infrastructure investment by 2020 to bring our grade D+ standards to safe standards.  

This is exactly what we need: to put bridge-builders to work rather than funding technology and personnel to destroy bridges, and to take tank-making factories and repurpose them to build high-speed trains.

In prioritizing military spending, Congress is cutting the very programs that can actually strengthen our economy: Cutting federal assistance to the states, forcing them to lay off teachers, firefighters, and social workers; cutting opportunities for job creation, training, and placement programs; and eviscerating funding for children’s programs and assistance for seniors.

These actions make no economic sense. 

Military spending generates fewer jobs per billion dollars spent than many other kinds of investments:  For every 100 jobs created by Pentagon spending, the same investment would create 251 jobs in education, 169 jobs in health care, or 147 jobs in clean energy.  

Conversely, every $1 billion cut in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program means 13,718 jobs lost. Many teachers, social workers, first responders, and other government workers have already lost their jobs from the $1.5 trillion in spending cuts since 2010.  

Even if $1 trillion were to be cut from the military budget over the next 10 years, America would still be spending at the peak levels of the Vietnam War and the Cold War. It is time to gather our senses.

In order to facilitate economic growth and development in America, defense spending is the wrong bellwether.  America's increasing number of military expeditions abroad, in the Middle East, Asia and Africa, has undermined the long-term stability of our economy at home. It has neither resulted in an economically vibrant, healthy, and well-educated nation, nor has it made us safer.

Both our progressive and conservative representatives should be joining forces, restraining waste and investing wisely. The key is to conserve, as a good housekeeper would, and invest in that which supports the family and home -- our nation and people.

It is time for our representatives and the Obama administration to seriously address the nature of the structural reforms that need to take place in order for our economy to get back on track.

We understand that the nation cannot spend its way out of this current economic crisis, in the same way that it cannot save or tax its way out. 

Congress needs to address the cyclical nature of our debt-based monetary system, which perpetuates inflation and crashes, and reform it meaningfully while massively cutting wasteful spending and, instead, investing in necessary infrastructure improvements that will create millions of productive jobs – all of which will help improve America’s health, education and prosperity.

Michael Shank is director of foreign policy at the Friends Committee on National Legislation.

Elizabeth Kucinich was a framer of 112th congress' HR 2990, the National Emergency Employment Defense (NEED) Act.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 5 tháng 5, 2013

Obama to travel to Texas, other states to tout economic plans

The White House says President Barack Obama's trip to Austin, Texas, on Thursday will kick off a series of day trips aimed at highlighting his proposals on jobs and the economy.

While in Texas, Obama will visit a technical high school and meet with entrepreneurs. He'll also drop in on a tech company and talk with blue-collar workers.

The trip show Obama wants to keep Americans focused on his economic proposals even while Congress is busy with an immigration overhaul and confirmation for Obama's second-term Cabinet nominees.

The White House says Obama will travel every few weeks and will emphasize his State of the Union proposals to expand pre-kindergarten and raise the minimum wage.


View the original article here

Thứ Hai, 1 tháng 4, 2013

Obama nominates economic aide to 2nd budget slot

President Barack Obama has nominated one of his senior economic advisers as deputy director of the White House budget office.

Obama has chosen Brian Deese as his nominee for the number two slot at the Office of Management and Budget, a key position as Obama and Congress confront ongoing fiscal challenges.

Deese has been deputy director of Obama's National Economic Council and was a main administration figure during auto bailout negotiations in 2009.

Last month, Obama nominated Wal-Mart's Sylvia Mathews Burwell to lead the budget office. If confirmed by the Senate, Burwell and Deese would assume their roles as the government continues to deal with automatic spending cuts that took effect at the beginning of March.

The budget office also plays a crucial role in shepherding through government regulations.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 10 tháng 3, 2013

Why I am a proud economic masochist

I traveled from Boston to New York yesterday on the Delta shuttle out of Logan.  The lines were especially long, and the wait to get through security was 30 minutes.  It's usually about 10 minutes at the time of day I was flying.  

The TSA agent at the conveyor belt kept announcing why people were being delayed and could expect similar delays, in the future.  "There's no more overtime with the Sequester," he said.  "Overtime at TSA is over."

Now, whether or not the Sequester really means there must be long waits at the Delta shuttle is one question:   I  suspect efficiencies could be implemented that would mean that any budget cuts at the agency would not have to mean poor performance.  After all, they've decided not to check for knives or clubs, anymore.  But, let's leave that aside for now.    

I am hoping for more pain from the Sequester.  I am now a proud economic masochist.

My immediate reaction to the announcement that I should anticipate inconveniences at airport security wasn't annoyance or worry; it was relief and resolve, about the short staffing.  I felt good that budget cuts were being made and that I could feel them. 

I liked the pain, because I am certain that our economy will not be righted without some discomfort--mine, included.  I felt like my wait in line was showing some personal discipline in service to the public good--a passive, but important form of public service--and that being willing to sacrifice now would be pay dividends for my kids' generation, too.  

I am hoping for more pain from the Sequester.  I am now a proud economic masochist.  And I hope you will be, too.

No one ever got stronger without pain.  Bodybuilders know it; they don't think you get more powerful by lifting less.  People looking to get off drugs know it.  And anyone who has dieted knows it.  If we are ever going to recover from the manic overspending of our entitlement culture, then we have to not only anticipate pain, but welcome it.

This is where our President may be seriously misjudging the American psyche.  Historically, at least, when push came to shove, Americans have been willing to bear enormous pain, in order to safeguard the nation and its future.  That was true when Abraham Lincoln insisted that the South not secede, it was true when we needed to survive the Great Depression and it was true when we defeated Nazi Germany.  While the President has softened up our nation, I doubt very much that we have gone so soft that a recorded message at the White House about spring tours being suspended is going to lead to mass revolts against Republican representatives in Congress.

In fact, I think folks could get addicted to fiscal fitness--looking around for the next bit of painful evidence that they are doing their part to strengthen the nation.  I think millions of Americans could end up seeing the President's scare tactics for exactly what they are--an assumption that we are a weak people unwilling to tolerate any suffering at all.  

Lots of people who were later defeated by our national mettle made the same mistake.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team. Dr. Ablow can be reached at info@keithablow.com.


View the original article here