Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn medical. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn medical. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Sáu, 3 tháng 5, 2013

Dr. Manny: Where is the outrage in the medical community over the Gosnell case?

  • Dr Kermit Gosnell_AP_April 20 2013.jpg

    In this photo provided by the Philadelphia District Attorney's office, Dr. Kermit Gosnell is shown. Jurors are deliberating after the eight-week trial of Gosnell, an abortion provider charged with killing a patient and seven babies.AP Photo/Philadelphia Police Department via Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, File

Jurors have begun deliberations in the murder trial of Dr. Kermit B. Gosnell, a Philadelphia-based abortion doctor charged with murdering viable babies born alive to women who had gone through labor and delivery.  Gosnell is facing five counts of murder, and if convicted, he could face the death penalty.

RELATED: Jury begins deliberating in murder trial of Philadelphia abortion doctor

I have heard many comments about how the media has failed to cover this story effectively.  But to me, I feel as if something else is missing: outrage from other doctors. Where is the anger from the medical community, medical societies and women’s health advocates?  

There is nothing about this trial that legitimizes the care these women received in that so-called medical clinic.  The act of murder must be determined by the jury; but to me, there is no question there was negligence and maleficence on the part of this doctor.

There’s nothing that I read about this man to indicate he had any proper training in gynecology or obstetrics, which is especially witnessed in the way he ran his practice.  Informed consent, record keeping, sterility techniques, and properly trained medical personnel are just a few things that were apparently not a priority in his medical office.  It appears many women were left to fend for themselves once they entered this “house of horror.”  

I would like to know about Dr. Gosnell’s medical peers.  How could a large practice such as that, generating millions of dollars for this doctor, not raise enough flags in the medical community serving the Philadelphia area?  Whistleblowers could have done a better job bringing the authorities to this facility earlier in order to question and inspect the services this clinic was providing to women.

I do not blame people for criticizing the medical community when they say we do a poor job policing ourselves.  This case is a perfect example.  Everyone looked the other way, allowing this doctor to practice in the dark, never showing his face to the light.


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 29 tháng 3, 2013

Deadly blood type solves 60-year-old medical mystery

  • 061106_blood_clot_02

    People with the rare Vel-negative blood type can die if they receive a Vel-positive transfusion, and now scientists know why.Nicolle Rager Fuller, National Science Foundation

A blood type that can turn blood transfusions deadly has proven a perplexing mystery for 60 years. Now researchers have finally identified the secret behind the blood type known as "Vel," findings that could help make blood safer for hundreds of thousands of people worldwide.

The mystery began in 1952, when a 66-year-old woman in New York, sick with colon cancer, received a blood transfusion and unexpectedly suffered from a severe and potentially fatal rejection of the blood. Investigators referred to her, using her last name, simply as Patient Vel.

Further research found that Mrs. Vel had developed a potent immune response against some unknown compound found on the red blood cells she had received. However, scientists could not identify this compound, opening the mystery of a new blood type, "Vel-negative."

"The molecular basis of the Vel-negative blood type remained elusive for more than 60 years despite intense efforts worldwide," researcher Bryan Ballif, a biochemist and mass spectrometrist at the University of Vermont, told LiveScience. [The 9 Most Bizarre Medical Conditions]

How Vel works

Most people in the world are Vel-positive, but soon investigators discovered that Mrs. Vel was not alone; more than 200,000 people in Europe and more than 100,000 in North America share the Vel-negative blood type. For the 1 in 2,500 people of European descent with the rare blood, receiving a Vel-positive transfusion can easily result in kidney failure and death.

Everyone's red blood cells are coated with molecules that can serve as what are called antigens, compounds that prompt the immune system to respond. It does so by pumping out proteins known as antibodies that latch onto and neutralize those antigens. However, people do not normally produce antibodies to their own red blood cell antigens, only to foreign ones — such as when they receive blood from another person who has a different blood type, and therefore an antigen they lack.

The most commonly known blood antigens make up the major human blood groups: A, B, AB and O. However, many less-common blood groups also exist, such as Vel, which can potentially make transfusions dangerous for patients.

Vel-negative blood is one of the most difficult blood types to supply in many countries. This is partly due to its rarity, but also to the dearth of any systematic way to screen for Vel-negative blood from donors. Previously, to identify whether someone was Vel-negative or Vel-positive, doctors had to use antibodies generated by the few known Vel-negative people after their bodies had rejected transfused blood. Many hospitals and blood banks lack access to these antibodies and thus any way to test for Vel.

Understanding rare blood types

Now Ballif, along with molecular biologist Lionel Arnaud of the French National Institute of Blood Transfusion and their colleagues have found the mysterious culprit behind Vel.

"Our findings promise to provide immediate assistance to health care professionals should they encounter this rare but vexing blood type," Ballif said.

To find the missing piece, the international team used antibodies from Vel-negative patients to purify the Vel protein from human red blood cell membranes. Ballif and his colleagues then identified the culprit, a tiny molecule researchers had never before observed, andwhich is now dubbed small integral membrane protein 1, or SMIM1. Genetic analysis of 70 Vel-negative people revealed that each such patient was missing a short gene that instructs cells how to make SMIM1. [7 Biggest Mysteries of the Human Body]

Last year, the same researchers identified the proteins responsible for two other rare blood types, Junior and Langeris. With Vel, the global count of understood blood types now rises to 33.

"While there are still a couple of rare blood types whose molecular basis remains to be elucidated, the Vel-negative blood type was surely the most vexing mystery," Arnaud told LiveScience.

The researchers developed DNA-based tests for identifying Vel-negative patients. These tests can easily be integrated into existing blood testing procedures and clinicians can complete them in two hours or less, the researchers said.

"For those rare Vel-negative individuals in need of a blood transfusion, this is a potentially life-saving time frame," Ballif said. "Even if you are that rare one person out of 2,500 that is Vel-negative, we now know how to rapidly type your blood and find blood for you."

The scientists detailed their findings online March 18 in the journal EMBO Molecular Medicine.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 22 tháng 3, 2013

Bipartisan push to repeal medical device tax gains traction in Senate

  • meddevicetax12.jpg

    June 15, 2007: A patient is put through a cat scan machine in Kingston, N.Y.AP

The Senate gave sweeping bipartisan approval Thursday to a proposal by Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., to put senators on record in favor of repealing a tax on medical devices – a key part of President Obama’s controversial health care law.

The Hatch-Klobuchar amendment to the GOP budget plan is the latest effort to roll back the tax that applies to a range of medical products, from surgical tools to heart devices. It’s among several taxes in Obama’s 2010 health care overhaul.

The amendment passed the Senate by a vote of 79 to 20.

“Today, bipartisan members of the Senate spoke loudly and clearly that this tax on medical devices simply must go.  It is a drain on innovation, on job creation and on our ability to provide ground breaking medical technologies to patients,” Hatch said in a statement.

The Affordable Care Act levies a 2.3 percent tax on medical devices with the goal of raising nearly $30 billion over the next decade.

Manufacturers say the impact of the tax is far greater than meets the eye -- the 2.3 percent tax is on gross sales, meaning it's a much greater percentage of net income. 

The Obama administration has defended the medical device tax, saying companies actually stand to benefit from the law. Though the 2.3 percent tax hits the industry, the department argues that the millions of new health care customers insured as a result of the law will increase the demand in hospitals to order more equipment -- in turn boosting medical device companies' profits. 

Last year the White House threatened to veto a House bill that would have repealed the tax, citing concerns that the House proposal would offset the lost revenue from the tax by cutting down on subsidies for some families. 

This, they said, would effectively "raise taxes on middle-class and low-income families." 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Thứ Năm, 21 tháng 3, 2013

Bi-partisan push to repeal medical device tax gaining traction in Senate

Senate Finance Committee ranking member Orrin Hatch is pushing an amendment that would repeal a tax on medical devices – a key part of President Obama’s controversial healthcare plan.

Hatch’s amendment has been gaining bipartisan traction among senators. It’s the latest effort to roll back the tax that applies to a range of medical products from surgical tools to heart devices. It’s among several taxes in President Obama’s 2010 healthcare overhaul.

The Affordable Care Act levies a 2.3 percent tax on medical devices with the goal of raising nearly $30 billion over the next decade.

Manufacturers say the impact of the tax is far greater than meets the eye -- the 2.3 percent tax is on gross sales, meaning it's a much greater percentage of net income. 

The Obama administration has defended the medical device tax, saying companies actually stand to benefit from the law. Though the 2.3 percent tax hits the industry, the department argues that the millions of new health care customers insured as a result of the law will increase the demand in hospitals to order more equipment -- in turn boosting medical device companies' profits. 

Last year the White House threatened to veto a House bill that would have repealed the tax, citing concerns that the House proposal would offset the lost revenue from the tax by cutting down on subsidies for some families. 

This, they said, would effectively "raise taxes on middle-class and low-income families." 


View the original article here