Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn normal. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn normal. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Ba, 16 tháng 4, 2013

Fear and the bombings in Boston -- what's normal, what's not

Unless we are in imminent danger, fear is the enemy of our health. Our heart races, our blood pressure goes up, we sweat, yet there is nothing for us to do. We fret, fail to sleep, and enter what I call a self-renewing cycle of worry. Hopefully, this won’t be our sustained reaction to the Boston Marathon bombings.

Most of the media medical attention on the bombings thus far has focused on the loss of limb and life, and on those who are hospitalized and struggling to recover. 

This is as it should be. 

But for those at the finish line both spectators and runners alike, it was fear that was the major reaction. Jay Soroko, senior producer at Fox News, was running in the marathon and was several blocks from the finish line when the bombs went off. He was trapped there for hours with hundreds of other petrified runners. “It was surreal,” Jay said. “It was like I was inside a bubble. It was easily the scariest event of my life. I was so worried about my loved ones’ safety.”

The goal of terrorists is to scare us. Just a few of  die, but the rest of us panic. 

For those who experienced the bombings directly, the images will live in their minds for the rest of their lives. There is a significant risk of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, complete with flashbacks, nightmares, depersonalizations, anxiety and depression. Psychotherapy may help some of these people to recover more quickly.

For the rest of us, as we sit transfixed by the news accounts, there is a danger of over-personalizing the risk, as occurred after 9/11, when more people were afraid to fly and took to the highways where they were then far more likely to die in car accidents as a result.  

Right now, as we are mesmerized by the images coming from Boston, there is the same kind of risk.  The more we worry unnecessarily, the more risks we may take in our own lives. We hear a loud noise, and we jump, for just an instant feeling that a bomb may have gone off in our own neighborhood.

This reaction isn’t healthy, but it is part of our voyeuristic attachment to the 24 hour news cycle. We think we need to take the risk seriously and protect ourselves, but at the very center of our brains sits the powerful amygala, an almond-shaped organ that generates strong emotions including fear. Unfortunately, the amygdala can be fooled; research from Elizabeth Phelps, a psychologist and neuroscientist at NYU has determined that we may have the same kind of hormonal reaction to danger we see on a video screen as one we experience directly ourselves.  

In other words, we can generate our own an outpouring of stress hormones in response to a perceived rather than a real risk. This fight or flight reaction is intended for if you are under attack, the victim of a real roadside bomb, rather than just watching one on TV.

America is understandably on edge today. But we need to gain perspective on this act of apparent terrorism as quickly as possible. Remember, the goal of terrorists is to scare us. Just a few of  die, but the rest of us panic. 

It is normal to feel vulnerable and to worry after an event like this, but if you find yourself obsessing on the news and it is interfering with your sleep and making you feel helpless, then it is time to pull back, watch less TV, and divert your attention elsewhere. And remember, if you want your children to be calm, then be calm yourself.

The less we obsess on the events in Boston on Monday, the less we panic, the better for our collective health.

Dr. Marc Siegel is an associate professor of medicine and medical director of Doctor Radio at NYU Langone Medical Center. He is a member of the Fox News Medical A Team and author of several books, including "False Alarm; the Truth About the Epidemic of Fear"; He is also the author of "Swine Flu and Bird Flu." His most recent book is  The Inner Pulse: Unlocking the Secret Code of Sickness and Health. 


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 20 tháng 3, 2013

DHS questioned over decision to let Saudi passengers skip normal passport controls

  • logan_security_102412.jpg

    Oct. 24, 2012: Passengers are scanned at a security checkpoint at Logan Airport in Boston.AP

A Department of Homeland Security program intended to give "trusted traveler" status to low-risk airline passengers soon will be extended to Saudi travelers, opening the program to criticism for accommodating the country that produced 15 of the 19 hijackers behind the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Sources voiced concern about the decision to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, which issued a report Wednesday on the under-the-radar announcement -- which was first made by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano after meeting in January with her Saudi counterpart. According to the IPT, this would be the first time the Saudi government has been given such a direct role in fast-tracking people for entry into the United States.

"I think you have radical Wahhabism in certain elements in Saudi Arabia, and I think to be more lenient there than in other places would be a mistake," Rep. Frank Wolf told the Investigative Project on Terrorism. "There were 15 [hijackers] from that country, and there is a lot taking place in that region."

Only an exclusive handful of countries enjoy inclusion in the Global Entry program -- Canada, Mexico, South Korea and the Netherlands. According to the IPT, some officials are questioning why Saudi Arabia gets to reap the benefits of the program, when key U.S. allies like Germany and France are not enrolled; Israel has reached a deal with the U.S., but that partnership has not yet been implemented.

Any Saudi travelers cleared through the program will be able to bypass the normal customs line after providing passports and fingerprints. The status lasts for five years.

The decision is a turnaround, the IPT notes, from when Saudi Arabia was briefly placed on a list of countries whose U.S.-bound travelers would face higher scrutiny, in the wake of the failed Christmas Day bombing attempt in 2009.

But Napolitano spoke highly of "the bond between the United States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia" when she announced the change in January.

"By enhancing collaboration with the government of Saudi Arabia, we reaffirm our commitment to more effectively secure our two countries against evolving threats while facilitating legitimate trade and travel," Napolitano said.

The Global Entry program was launched in 2008 to expedite pre-approved passengers through the airport customs and security process when they arrive in the U.S. The program is designed to weed out low-risk passengers and enable authorities to zero in on those who may be more likely to pose a threat.

But the program has sparked controversy in the past. Critics objected in late 2010 when Mexican citizens were included in the program, raising concerns that drug cartels would quickly learn how to exploit loopholes in the plan. DHS officials, however, insisted at the time that people who attain trusted traveler status don't get a free pass and are still subject to random searches.

The program allows travelers who have undergone a thorough vetting process -- fingerprinting, background checks, interviews with customs agents, etc.-- to attain a low-risk status that allows them to skip the line at customs and complete their entry process at an automatic kiosk.


View the original article here