Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Wright. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Wright. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Hai, 1 tháng 4, 2013

Smithsonian releases Wright brothers contract detailing 'first in flight' claims

  • Wright_Flyer_First_Flight 660.jpg

    Dec. 17 1903: The first flight by Wright brothers Ovrville and Wilbur, at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina.

Were the Wright brothers first in flight? Read the fine print. 

A little-known 1948 contract between the estate of Orville Wright and the Smithsonian has the museum legally bound to call the Wright brothers first in flight: "The Smithsonian shall [not state] any aircraft ... earlier than the Wright aeroplane of 1903 ... was capable of carrying a man under its own power in controlled flight," it states.

One aviation historian claims that contract is wrong, however, forcing the museum to ignore the truth. And for the first time, the museum has released the contract publicly to FoxNews.com, to let the world make its own decisions.

According to most anyone you ask, Orville and Wilbur sailed into history books on Dec. 17, 1903, following their historic flight at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. The Smithsonian features the Wright Flyer prominently today.

But Australian aviation historian John Brown argues that a recently uncovered photograph proves German immigrant Gustav Whitehead flew first (over Connecticut, in the wee hours of Aug. 14, 1901). Brown says the Smithsonian is bound by that contract to ignore Whitehead’s feat. And the secrecy has to go, he wrote last week to the Smithsonian’s senior curator.

“With apologies to Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev: ... Mr. Crouch, tear up that contract!”

The contract was signed in 1948 between surviving Wright brother Orville and the museum; it secured ownership of the Flyer from London’s Science Museum for $1, with a stipulation: The Wright plane must always be recognized as the first true airplane.

“Jane’s: All the World’s Aircraft” -- widely considered the essential bible of flight -- recently acknowledged Whitehead's achievement, and agreed with Brown about the contract.

“History is normally written by researchers who have dispassionately analyzed all relevant data and not, as here, by the lawyers of interested parties,” the book reads.

The contract does exist and still holds, said Tom Crouch, senior curator of aeronautics at the museum, in a recent blog post.

"The contract remains in force today, a healthy reminder of a less-than-exemplary moment in Smithsonian history."

The Smithsonian was involved in pioneering efforts to achieve flight in the first years of the 20th century, it turns out. An airplane created by the museum was on display in the teens, labelled “first airplane capable of flight.”

'On the surface, yes this agreement does exist … and the agreement has never been secret.'

- Peter Jakab, associate director of curatorial affairs for the Smithsonian Museum

“That was a very misleading statement,” Peter Jakab, associate director of curatorial affairs for the Smithsonian Museum, told FoxNews.com -- one that angered Orville. 

Wright sent his plane to London in 1928 in protest, with Charles Lindbergh's help, where it remained until 1942 when the museum published an extensive article about the Smithsonian's "Langley plane" that set the record straight.

“The plane was put in storage during World War II at a quarry with the Magna Carta and the crown jewels. After the war, arrangements were made to bring it back,” Jakab said.

Those arrangements were between the executors of the estate -- Orville having died of a heart attack -- and the Smithsonian. To avoid paying high taxes on the transfer, a contract was signed.

“The executors put in the agreement a label that always would be displayed with the flyer … directed toward the Langley issue,” he told FoxNews.com.

In an open letter sent March 24 to the Smithsonian's Crouch, Brown argued that the letter was coloring his view of history.

“You saying the Wrights flew first is like Bill Gates saying Microsoft products are good -- except that Bill is more credible because no contract actually requires him to say that,” Brown wrote.

In an open response two days later, Crouch dismissed those claims.

“I can only repeat that if substantial evidence of a pre-Wright flight claim were to be produced, I hope I would have the courage to admit it.”

Ultimately, the question of who flew first is less important than the legacy left by the Wright's design anyway, Jakab argued.

“[The Wright Flyer] was able to evolve into something we have today. And that’s its real powerful significance -- in addition to being the first to fly.”


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 19 tháng 3, 2013

Wright or wrong? Smithsonian enters 'first in flight' fight

  • gustav-whitehead-01.JPG

    Gustave Whitehead, 2nd from left, with visitors in front of his "No 21". At his feet the self built gas pressure motor.Flight Historical Research Foundation Gustav Weisskopf

  • gustav-whitehead-03.JPG

    Aviation Pioneer Whitehead with daughter Rose in front of his "No. 21". In the foreground is his self-built gas pressure motor.Flight Historical Research Foundation Gustav Weisskopf

Is his plane claim full of hot air?

Orville and Wilbur Wright were actually second in flight, and the Wright Flyer honored with a spot at the Smithsonian wasn’t the first plane. That stunning claims come from Australian historian John Brown, who told FoxNews.com that Gustav Whitehead -- a Bavarian who immigrated to Connecticut -- made a sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine on August 14, 1901, two years before the Wrights.

'Are we to assume that he forgot the secret of flight?'

- Smithsonian senior curator of aeronautics Tom Crouch

Balderdash, says the Smithsonian’s chief curator of aeronautics.

In a statement published on the National Air and Space Museum’s website Friday, senior curator of aeronautics Tom Crouch stood by Orville and Wilbur -- arguing that we were right about the Wrights.

“The strongest argument against the Whitehead claims is to be found in the fact that not one of the powered machines that he built after 1902 ever left the ground,” Crouch wrote. “Are we to assume that he forgot the secret of flight?”

Whitehead flew a winged, bird-like plane called No. 21 or "The Condor," with wooden wheels and canvas wings stretched taut across bat-like wooden arms. Brown said it rose over the darkened streets of Bridgeport, Conn., and covered an estimated 1.5 miles at a height of 50 feet.

Whitehead reportedly brought the chief editor of the Bridgeport Herald to witness the event, which led to a news article for the paper and a photo of the historic event -- a photo that, unfortunately for history, turned out to be awfully blurry.

Brown instead based his claims on an exhaustive analysis of a century-old image, a picture of that picture that he believes depicts Whitehead in the air over Connecticut.

Brown blew up the image 3,500 percent. It yielded a blurry smudge. But based on that image and a slew of turn of the century news accounts, he convinced the authoritative publication “Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft” of Whitehead’s story.

In the introduction to the 100th edition of the book, posted online March 9, editor Paul Jackson sided with Whitehead. The Smithsonian curator took issue with Jackson too.

“Mr. Jackson would have been well advised to take a look at the historical record of the case, and not make his decision based on a flawed website,” Crouch wrote.

Connecticut politicians have nevertheless been eager to shanghai the “first in flight” mantle from North Carolina. Bill Finch, the mayor of Bridgeport (where Whitehead reportedly made his historic flight) recommends that the state get new license plates reading “First-er in Flight,” according to the CT Mirror website.

There’s even talk of “Whitehead bratwurst” at local restaurants, the site notes.


View the original article here

Wright or wrong? Smithsonian enters 'first in flight' fight

Is his plane claim full of hot air?

Orville and Wilbur Wright were actually second in flight, and the Wright Flyer honored with a spot at the Smithsonian wasn’t the first plane. That stunning claim come from Australian historian John Brown, who told FoxNews.com that Gustav Whitehead -- a Bavarian who immigrated to Connecticut -- made a sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine on August 14, 1901, two years before the Wrights.

'Are we to assume that he forgot the secret of flight?'

- Smithsonian senior curator of aeronautics Tom Crouch

Balderdash, says the Smithsonian’s chief curator of aeronautics.

In a statement published on the National Air and Space Museum’s website Friday, senior curator of aeronautics Tom Crouch stood by Orville and Wilbur -- arguing that we were right about the Wrights.

“The strongest argument against the Whitehead claims is to be found in the fact that not one of the powered machines that he built after 1902 ever left the ground,” Crouch wrote. “Are we to assume that he forgot the secret of flight?”

Whitehead flew a winged, bird-like plane called No. 21 or "The Condor," with wooden wheels and canvas wings stretched taut across bat-like wooden arms. Brown said it rose over the darkened streets of Bridgeport, Conn., and covered an estimated 1.5 miles at a height of 50 feet.

Whitehead reportedly brought the chief editor of the Bridgeport Herald to witness the event, which led to a news article for the paper and a photo of the historic event -- a photo that, unfortunately for history, turned out to be awfully blurry.

Brown instead based his claims on an exhaustive analysis of a century-old image, a picture of that picture that he believes depicts Whitehead in the air over Connecticut.

Brown blew up the image 3,500 percent. It yielded a blurry smudge. But based on that image and a slew of turn of the century news accounts, he convinced the authoritative publication “Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft” of Whitehead’s story.

In the introduction to the 100th edition of the book, posted online March 9, editor Paul Jackson sided with Whitehead. The Smithsonian curator took issue with Jackson too.

“Mr. Jackson would have been well advised to take a look at the historical record of the case, and not make his decision based on a flawed website,” Crouch wrote.

Connecticut politicians have nevertheless been eager to shanghai the “first in flight” mantle from North Carolina. Bill Finch, the mayor of Bridgeport (where Whitehead reportedly made his historic flight) recommends that the state get new license plates reading “First-er in Flight,” according to the CT Mirror website.

There’s even talk of “Whitehead bratwurst” at local restaurants, the site notes.


View the original article here