GOP lawmaker weighs overhaul of asylum process in wake of Boston bombings

• 

• • 

    Will Boston terror impact the immigration debate?

  • 

    How was call made to end FBI questioning of Boston suspect?

  • 

    Rep. Peter King on Boston suspect being read Miranda rights

The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee said Thursday that the way the U.S. grants asylum to immigrants may need to be changed in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings.

Accused Boston Marathon bombers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are ethnic Chechen brothers from Russia who came to the United States about a decade ago with their parents. The family was granted asylum.

"We certainly will view that as a part of overall comprehensive immigration reform," Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., told reporters Thursday, adding that no decisions have been made on possible changes to the asylum process.

Goodlatte didn't specify what might need to be changed in the process, only saying it's something that bears examination in the wake of the Boston bombings. So do with other aspects of the U.S. immigration system, including the naturalization process by which immigrants become U.S. citizens, Goodlatte said.

"People getting asylum because they are in the minority, but engaging in aggressive tactics in their home country that may cause them to be susceptible to doing the same thing elsewhere, that obviously ought to be a part of our consideration in granting political asylum to avoid situations like Boston," said Goodlatte, who's working to develop a series of bills to fix problems with the country's immigration system.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is a U.S. citizen while Tamerlan Tsarnaev had sought citizenship but had not had his application granted.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in a shootout with police last week. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was arrested after being found hiding, unarmed, in a boat.

On Thursday, authorities said the brothers were headed for New York's Times Square to blow up the rest of their explosives in a spur-of-the-moment scheme that fell apart when the brothers realized the car they had hijacked was low on gas.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano defended the asylum process this week in an appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee, saying it involves multiple layers of vetting.

A comprehensive immigration bill introduced last week in the Senate also may undergo changes in response to Boston. One of its authors, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has suggested strengthening background checks done on certain immigrants considered higher-risk, such as refugees or asylum-seekers.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., another author, said Thursday that it's too early to know what changes might be needed.

"We are completely open to amendments that would in any way prevent what happened in Boston," McCain said at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast for reporters. "I am sure that by the time this bill reaches the floor we will be able to reach conclusions and we will include provisions like that if we feel they are necessary."

But the top committee Republican, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised concerns earlier this week because the bill eliminates a requirement that people apply for asylum within a year of arriving in the country, and allows new applications from those whose cases have been unsuccessful because they didn't comply with the one-year bar to reapply.

Authors of the bill, including Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., have said they're open to changes in the legislation should any issues come to light in the wake of the Boston attack.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

View the original article here

Study: Health care overhaul to increase claims costs by 32 percent

Medical claims costs -- the biggest driver of health insurance premiums -- will jump an average 32 percent for Americans' individual policies under President Obama's overhaul, according to a study by the nation's leading group of financial risk analysts. 

The report could turn into a big headache for the Obama administration at a time when many parts of the country remain skeptical about the Affordable Care Act. The estimates were recently released by the Society of Actuaries to its members. 

While some states will see medical claims costs per person decline, the report concluded the overwhelming majority will see double-digit increases in their individual health insurance markets, where people purchase coverage directly from insurers. 

The disparities are striking. By 2017, the estimated increase would be 62 percent for California, about 80 percent for Ohio, more than 20 percent for Florida and 67 percent for Maryland. Much of the reason for the higher claims costs is that sicker people are expected to join the pool, the report said. 

The report did not make similar estimates for employer plans, the mainstay for workers and their families. That's because the primary impact of Obama's law is on people who don't have coverage through their jobs. 

The administration questions the design of the study, saying it focused only on one piece of the puzzle and ignored cost relief strategies in the law such as tax credits to help people afford premiums and special payments to insurers who attract an outsize share of the sick. The study also doesn't take into account the potential price-cutting effect of competition in new state insurance markets that will go live on Oct. 1, administration officials said. 

"It's misleading to look at only some of the provisions of the law because, taken together, the law will reduce costs," said Health and Human Services spokeswoman Erin Shields Britt. 

But a prominent national expert, recently retired Medicare chief actuary Rick Foster, said the report does "a credible job" of estimating potential enrollment and costs under the law, "without trying to tilt the answers in any particular direction." 

"Having said that," Foster added, "actuaries tend to be financially conservative, so the various assumptions might be more inclined to consider what might go wrong than to anticipate that everything will work beautifully." Actuaries use statistics and economic theory to make long-range cost projections for insurance and pension programs sponsored by businesses and government. The society is headquartered near Chicago. 

Kristi Bohn, an actuary who worked on the study, acknowledged it did not attempt to estimate the effect of subsidies, insurer competition and other factors that could mitigate cost increases. She said the goal was to look at the underlying cost of medical care. 

"Claims cost is the most important driver of health care premiums," she said. 

"We don't see ourselves as a political organization," Bohn added. "We are trying to figure out what the situation at hand is." 

On the plus side, the report found the law will cover more than 32 million currently uninsured Americans when fully phased in. And some states -- including New York and Massachusetts -- will see double-digit declines in costs for claims in the individual market. 

Uncertainty over costs has been a major issue since the law passed three years ago, and remains so just months before a big push to cover the uninsured gets rolling Oct. 1. Middle-class households will be able to purchase subsidized private insurance in new marketplaces, while low-income people will be steered to Medicaid and other safety net programs. States are free to accept or reject a Medicaid expansion also offered under the law. 

Obama has promised that the new law will bring costs down. That seems a stretch now. While the nation has been enjoying a lull in health care inflation the past few years, even some former administration advisers say a new round of cost-curbing legislation will be needed. 

Bohn said the study overall presents a mixed picture. 

Millions of now-uninsured people will be covered as the market for directly purchased insurance more than doubles with the help of government subsidies. The study found that market will grow to more than 25 million people. But costs will rise because spending on sicker people and other high-cost groups will overwhelm an influx of younger, healthier people into the program. 

Some of the higher-cost cases will come from existing state high-risk insurance pools. Those people will now be able to get coverage in the individual insurance market, since insurance companies will no longer be able to turn them down. Other people will end up buying their own plans because their employers cancel coverage. While some of these individuals might save money for themselves, they will end up raising costs for others. 

Part the reason for the wide disparities in the study is that states have different populations and insurance rules. In the relatively small number of states where insurers were already restricted from charging higher rates to older, sicker people, the cost impact is less. 

"States are starting from different starting points, and they are all getting closer to one another," said Bohn. 

The study also did not model the likely patchwork results from some states accepting the law's Medicaid expansion while others reject it. It presented estimates for two hypothetical scenarios in which all states either accept or reject the expansion. 

Larry Levitt, an insurance expert with the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation, reviewed the report and said the actuaries need to answer more questions. 

"I'd generally characterize it as providing useful background information, but I don't think it's complete enough to be treated as a projection," Levitt said. The conclusion that employers with sicker workers would drop coverage is "speculative," he said. 

Another caveat: The Society of Actuaries contracted Optum, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, to do the number-crunching that drives the report. United also owns the nation's largest health insurance company. Bohn said the study reflects the professional conclusions of the society, not Optum or its parent company.

View the original article here

Amid rumors of possible retailers, Disney announces overhaul of Downtown Disney

• 

  Artist renderings: Disney Springs will include more restaurant and entertainment venues, as well as a lakefront.Walt Disney Co.

• 

  Artist renderings: Downtown Disney will feature a series of new elevated spaces that provide both shade and an overlook to the activity below.Walt Disney Co

• 

  Artist rendering: Overview of two of four outdoor neighborhoods planned shows shopping and dining along a promenadeWalt Disney Co

• 

  Downtown Disney will be transformed into Disney Springs, with over one hundred new restaurants and retail outlets.Disney

Next Slide Previous Slide

Downtown Disney at Walt Disney World is about to be transformed from a quaint main street to a possible modern day Rodeo Drive.

Walt Disney World announced a multi-year plan to remake Downtown Disney, dubbed Disney Springs, that will add more retail, dining and nightlife experiences and features like open-air promenades. Disney says it plans to double the number of shops, restaurants and other venues by 150 more outlets. 

"Disney Springs will be a timeless, vibrant place where Walt Disney World guests and local residents can relax, shop, dine and be entertained in an imaginative setting where they'll instantly feel at home," said Tom Staggs, chairman of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, said Thursday in a release.

Of course, rumors are rife about which retailers could be featured in the redesign. The unofficial Disney World fan site WDW Magic has sparked a lot of talk about potential restaurants, including the possibility of food trucks and the addition of the popular New York City burger joint, Shake Shack. 

But Shake Shack representatives denied those reports to FoxNews.com.

"As you can imagine, rumors often circulate about our potential openings. With that being said, there is no truth to the recent Disney Springs rumor," said Greg Waters, Shake Shack's senior marketing and communications.

The website Eater is also reporting that another possible retailers could include something from Iron Chef star Masaharu Morimoto.

In addition to food, WKMG in Orlando is also reporting foreign clothing stores such as UNIQLO and more upscale fashion icons like Dior and MAC Cosmetics could be in the mix.

Construction is scheduled to start in April and sections will open in phases. The project is expected to be finished by 2016.

Ricky Brigante, FoxNews.com contributor and editor of the Disney fan site, Inside the Magic contributed to this report.

Related Stories

Disney unveils theme park redo with Cars Land

Darth Vader Does Disneyland

Best spring break value travel destinations: Scottsdale

View the original article here