Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn sites. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn sites. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Chủ Nhật, 7 tháng 4, 2013

'Anonymous' hackers launch cyberattack on Israeli sites

Israel's media is reporting that the country's websites are under cyberattack, but most targeted sites do not appear to have been affected.

Posters using the name of the hacking group Anonymous had warned they would launch a massive attack on Israeli sites in a strike they called (hash)OpIsrael.

Israel's Bureau of Statistics was down on Sunday morning but it was unclear if it was hacked. The media said the sites of the Defense and Education Ministry as well as banks had come under attack the night before but they were mostly repelled. Israeli activists hacked sites in Pakistan, the media said.

Hackers have tried before to topple Israeli sites.

A concerted effort to cripple Israeli websites during November fighting in Gaza failed to cause serious disruption.


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 15 tháng 3, 2013

Hagel unveils $1B plan to beef up missile defense, eyeing new sites on East Coast

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel unveiled Friday a $1 billion Pentagon plan to beef up missile defense in response to threats from North Korea, saying part of the plan would be to explore three new sites for ground-based interceptors.

One of the potential sites would be at Alaska's Fort Greeley, which already is home to missile silos. The other two potential locations haven't been disclosed but would be somewhere on the East Coast.

Under the plan, first reported Thursday by Fox News, the Pentagon would commit at least 14 additional ground-based interceptors to Fort Greeley and send an additional radar system to Japan, with a cost for the project estimated at just under $1 billion.

The announcement follows a recent threat from Pyongyang of a "pre-emptive" nuclear strike on the United States. Officials are signaling that they are taking North Korea's young, new ruler, Kim Jong Un, seriouusly.

"The young lad ought to be deterred," Joint Chiefs of Staff Vice Chairman Adm. Winnefeld said Friday at the news conference to announce the missile defense plan.

The extra interceptors on the West Coast, designed to counter attacks from an intercontinental ballistic missile, would bring the total number of interceptors to 44, a plan originally proposed by the Bush administration. President Obama stopped the deployment of the additional interceptors when he took office in 2009, leaving the total number at 30.

Congressional sources claim that by stalling the original plan and forcing the military to bring back on line silos that otherwise would have been operational, the Obama administration has effectively wasted millions in taxpayer’s dollars.

It’s a sentiment that is not likely to sit well with conservative lawmakers when the plan is announced on Monday, particularly as they seek new austerity measures.

An Obama administration official tells Fox News that the increase in interceptors is a logical response to an evolving threat from North Korea and that “anyone who suggests we should have stayed the course” with the Bush administration’s plan is engaging in “Monday morning quarterbacking.”

This official says the North Korean threat is much different from what it was in 2009. Along with the continued testing of nuclear weapons and longer-range delivery systems, the North Koreans have advanced their mobile missile capability, even within the last six to eight months.

“What we were defending against (from North Korea) four years ago was a single rogue missile, now with the mobile missile developing you have got to be able to counter multiple missile threats … so you have to expand your capability.”

Whether intentional or not, the announcement also coincides with 30th anniversary of President Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative speech.  The nation’s first ground-based interceptors were set up in 2002 under President George W. Bush.

Fox News' Justin Fishel contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Dirty bomb material secured at site in Philadelphia, thousands of sites remain in U.S.

  • NNSA Temple device 2.JPG

    Mar. 11, 2013: The National Nuclear Security Administration and Temple University today announced the successful shipment of a radiological device from the university's Old Medical School Building.NNSA

  • NNSA Temple device.JPG

    Mar. 11, 2013: The National Nuclear Security Administration and Temple University today announced the successful shipment of a radiological device from the university's Old Medical School Building.NNSA

  • NNSA Temple device 1.JPG

    Mar. 11, 2013: The National Nuclear Security Administration and Temple University today announced the successful shipment of a radiological device from the university's Old Medical School Building.NNSA

Raw, radiological material that terrorists could use to build a dirty bomb was secured in a Philadelphia school this week.

On March 11, the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (a semiautonomous branch of the Energy Department) and Philadelphia’s Temple University announced they had secured a device containing cesium 137 -- one of more than two dozen such elements used in medicine and industry that could be turned into a dirty bomb.

“This operation is part of NNSA’s broad strategy to keep dangerous nuclear and radiological material safe and secure by enhancing our nation’s security,” NNSA deputy administrator Anne Harrington said.

A terrorist dirty bomb attack using domestic radioactive sources bomb may seem preposterous, yet the NNSA has identified more than 2,700 vulnerable buildings with high-priority radiological material in the United States alone.

'This operation is part of NNSA’s broad strategy to keep dangerous nuclear and radiological material safe and secure.'

- NNSA deputy administrator Anne Harrington

As of Feb. 28, 2011, only 251 of these buildings had completed NNSA security enhancements. The agency hopes the rest will do so by 2025 -- leaving another 12 years of vulnerability to theft and misuse.

Dirty bombs are far easier to construct than nuclear bombs and do not use fissile material such as enriched uranium or plutonium. Extracting plutonium requires a reactor and enriching uranium is no easy task. Dirty bombs (security forces all them “radiation dispersal devices”) use conventional explosives such as car bombs to scatter radioactive materials through a densely populated area.

The physical damage is limited and the threat of dying from radiation exposure very small with such a device. But a dirty bomb would cause extensive economic damage and social upheaval while instilling panic and fear in civilians.

Philadelphia, New York City, and around the country
In this case, the material came from a medical research irradiator that was removed from Temple University’s Old Medical School Building and transported to a secure location, where it will be prepared for disposal at a federal facility.

The device had been used in medical research for two decades. The cesium-137 left within it would have been an attractive target.

Prior to this decommissioning, Temple University had worked with the NNSA to install security enhancements in all their facilities with high-activity radiological materials. The city of Philadelphia has collaborated with the agency as well to secure 28 buildings with high-activity radiological materials since 2005.

Just over two years ago, another terrorist treasure trove was recovered from a warehouse a mere 25 miles outside of Manhattan. On January 2010, the NNSA secured of high-activity radioactive devices containing enough cesium-137 to make a bomb.

"Properly disposing of more than 3,000 curies of Cesium eliminates the threat this material poses if lost or stolen and used in a dirty bomb," NNSA administrator Thomas P. D'Agostino said at the time.

The agency has recovered and secured more than 31,000 disused and surplus radioactive sealed sources within the United States, eliminating more than a million curies of what is essentially radiological catnip for terrorists.

Each year, thousands of sources become disused and unwanted in the United States. There are regulatory requirements for in-place secure storage, and the Global Threat Reduction Initiative also helps to remove these sources for permanent and safe disposal.

Yet thousands more civilian sites use radiological materials for commercial, medical and research applications.

Threat level
There are approximately twenty-five different radionuclides used in medicine and industry, from devices to measure product moisture and monitor pipe corrosion through to power sources.

Sources, often referred to as “sealed sources,” tend to be small metal containers with radioactive material sealed inside.

The container is meant to prevent radiation from escaping, and as long as the housing remains intact and sealed (and it is properly handled), it presents no health risk.

To purchase a device with this sort of material requires a licensed and plans to safely and legally dispose of it. The International Atomic Energy Agency ranks the potential harm of such devices from 1 to 5.

Category 1 sources such as irradiators or teletherapy machines could cause death or permanent injury to those in close proximity for a short period of time, ranging from minutes to hours. Category 5 sources like X-ray fluorescence devices could cause minor temporary injury.

Upgrading physical security at civilian radiological sites is paramount, and NNSA works in cooperation with federal, state and local agencies, and private industry to install security enhancements on high priority nuclear and radiological materials.

Some facilities do not have the resources to make these security upgrades and NNSA will provide the funding if the facility agrees to take over future maintenance.

In April 2009, President Obama announced that he would secure vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years. He described a terrorist acquiring nuclear weapons as "the most immediate and extreme threat to global security."

The President’s FY 2012 budget request included $2.5 billion, and $14.2 billion over five years, to reduce this global nuclear threat. Yet four years have elapsed and the vulnerable material has not been completely secured.

In most dirty bomb scenarios hundreds may die from the blast, but only a few, if any at all, would die from radioactivity. It is the fear of radiation or terror that a dirty bomb would unleash that makes it so attractive to terrorists.

Even if there isn’t a health threat, the public could be expected to panic about the radiation risks, possibly causing economic paralysis, mass evacuations, and displaced populations reluctant to return to their homes.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is developing a database to track sources. Both this National Radioactive Source Database and the Nuclear Materials Events Database to track lost sources will not be available to the public.


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 1 tháng 3, 2013

NORAD may shed 24-hour alert sites in Va., Minn.

NORAD is considering removing two of its 18 Air Force sites from 24-hour alert, saying it would save millions of dollars without compromising its ability to defend against 9/11-style attacks.

A Government Accountability Office report released Thursday said the North American Aerospace Defense Command might take fighter jets in Duluth, Minn., and at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., off 24-hour alert.

No decision has been made and both sites remain on alert, said Navy Capt. Jeff Davis, a NORAD spokesman.

NORAD, based at Peterson Air Force Base, Colo., told the GAO the move wouldn't hurt its ability to scramble fighters to intercept hostile or hijacked aircraft. NORAD said it used analyses by computer modeling, a panel of experts and other methods to arrive at that conclusion.

The Air Force told the GAO the move would save $73.1 million over five years. The proposal appeared to be unrelated to mandatory budget cuts taking effect Friday.

Units that would be taken off around-the-clock alert are the Minnesota Air National Guard's148th Fighter Group in Duluth and the Vermont Air National Guard's 158th Fighter Group, which flies NORAD missions out of Langley-Eustis.

It wasn't known how other operations at the two fighter groups would be affected. The GAO said most of the savings would come from shifting full-time personnel to part-time status.

The Minnesota National Guard issued a statement saying only that it was aware of the report and that the fighter wing remained on alert.

A spokesman for the Vermont National Guard did not immediately return a call.

An earlier GAO report said the other NORAD alert sites are in Alaska, Arizona, California (two), Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin.

NORAD is a joint U.S.-Canada command responsible for protecting the skies over both nations and monitoring sea approaches.


View the original article here