Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn story. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn story. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Năm, 25 tháng 4, 2013

America, there is hope in courageous Boston bombing survivor's story

Her name is Kaitlynn Cates, and she is a 25 year old woman who was standing at the finish line of the Boston Marathon two weeks ago when the first bomb went off, blowing her into the air and damaging her right leg. 

She told me she was bleeding profusely and she thought she might not survive. Then her friend Leo took off his T-shirt and used it to put pressure on the wound, stopping the bleeding as he lifted her into his arms and carried her to his car. From there he drove her the wrong way down one way streets to Massachusetts General Hospital.

It is a storybook tale that will have a happy ending even amidst the fear and dark feelings that the terrorists have elicited in all of us. “I never looked back,” she said to me, almost biblically. “I’m definitely going to rise above this. There’s always going to be a scar. But I’m not going to let them win. I’m not going to let them stop me from living a normal, healthy, happy life.” 

I spoke with Kaitlynn in her room at the hospital with Leo by her side and found her to be upbeat, strong, and looking forward to a complete recovery.

Unfortunately, not all of the survivors of the tragedy are as fortuitous, and for many it will be many months of agonizing physical and psychotherapy before they achieve what doctors call “the new normal.”

After the Boston Marathon attacks Americans should focus on a story of courage and hope like Kaitlynn Cates’ and a story of commitment and skill like Dr. King’s.

Kaitlynn was already thinking clearly and purposefully in her hospital room, but the most underreported story following the Boston Marathon bombings are likely to be Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, which will surface in the months to come. 

Many patients who injured their brains from the blast don’t know it yet. There is an epidemic (close to half a million patients) among veterans of the wars who are suffering from TBI or PTSD.
Dr. David King, top trauma surgeon at Massachusetts General Hospital who served in Iraq, ran in the Marathon, finished in three hours, and then turned right around and began operating on survivors at the hospital. For those who suffered shrapnel wounds, King and others were able to save their legs through multiple operations. 

King told me that almost all the patients who didn’t require amputations initially won’t need them now thanks to the latest surgical techniques though they will require extensive rehabilitation. He said that more than a decade of war have led to all major trauma surgeons being familiar with these new methods.

A good treatment for all the fear and worry in America right now because of the terror attack and concern over future attacks is to focus on a story of courage and hope like Kaitlynn Cates’ and a story of commitment and skill like Dr. King’s.

In the end, the American spirit still has the power and the flexibility to overcome terror in all its guises.

Dr. Marc Siegel is an associate professor of medicine and medical director of Doctor Radio at NYU Langone Medical Center. He is a member of the Fox News Medical A Team and author of several books, including "False Alarm; the Truth About the Epidemic of Fear"; He is also the author of "Swine Flu and Bird Flu." His most recent book is  The Inner Pulse: Unlocking the Secret Code of Sickness and Health. 


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 16 tháng 4, 2013

Democrat changes story of Progress Kentucky members taping McConnell meeting

  • McConnell_fair.jpg

    FILE: May 22, 2012: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.,speaks following a weekly strategy meeting at the Capitol in Washington.AP

The Democrat who implicated two members of the liberal super PAC Progress Kentucky in the secret taping of a campaign strategy meeting for Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell is changing his story.

Jacob Conway, a member of the Jefferson County Democratic Executive Committee, said Friday he might have talked to only one of the men he accused, according to The Courier-Journal.

Conway told the newspaper he is certain he talked with volunteer Curtis Morrison about the recording, but might not have spoken with Executive Director Shawn Reilly, contradicting what he said a day earlier.  

“I had a lot of conversations with both of them during that time period, and maybe I was just confused, and maybe Shawn never said anything,” Conway said.

On Tuesday, Mother Jones magazine released an audio file of the senator and aides discussing opposition research that included talk about then-potential Democratic candidate and actress Ashley Judd and her past bouts with depression.

The recording was purportedly made in a hallway outside McConnell’s Louisville headquarters.

Conway changed his story after a lawyer for Reilly said Conway lied about his client’s role. The lawyer also said Reilly had complied with FBI and U.S. attorney office probes.

The newspaper story also points out Conway made a plea agreement in 2006 to felony theft charges.

To read more from The Courier-Journal, click here:


View the original article here

Thứ Hai, 15 tháng 4, 2013

'Tell me who you are' -- 3 reasons to share your story

  • 012712_web_tutu.jpg

    FILE: Former South African Anglican Bishop Desmond TutuFBN

It was a life-shifting question from South African social right activist and Anglican Bishop Desmond Tutu inviting me to tell him about my life – “Not what you’ve done, but who you are.”  

No one had ever asked me such a question before. 

Most of us expect the inevitable question of “What do you do?” from strangers. When you can respond to “Tell me who you are” a dramatic shift happens in your engagement with others and your experience of life. 

It was 1980 and I was in my first one-on-one meeting with Tutu. I had decided that instead of serving in the South African military -- which enforced apartheid -- I would go to jail. I didn’t know if I could survive prison so I went seeking Tutu’s advice.

I had decided that instead of serving in the South African military -- which enforced apartheid -- I would go to jail. I didn’t know if I could survive prison so I went seeking Tutu’s advice.

I was a 22-year-old privileged white kid in the presence of a 49-year-old internationally known human rights activist who was an iconic figure to me. I was honored to be in his presence and my nervousness quickly gave way to being floored by his unexpected question.

As I told him about the physical pain that had transformed my life during two spinal surgeries as a teenager I wondered why I was intuitively telling him these details. I spoke about the loneliness and fears while hospitalized for six weeks at a time. 

I related how a book I read and re-read in the hospital by Trevor Huddleston had upended my life. 

Huddleston described the vibrant multi-ethnic, multi-cultural community he had served outside of Johannesburg that had been bulldozed by the apartheid government because of those defining qualities. 

I described Huddleston’s book as my first conscious awakening to the realities of my own country and an invitation to be involved in the anti-apartheid movement.

When I told Tutu that Huddleston had been like a visitor to me in the hospital he burst out laughing! 

I wondered what I had said to evoke such a reaction. 

After settling down Tutu told me of the loneliness and fears he had experienced as a teenager hospitalized with tuberculosis. Then he said, “Trevor Huddleston was my priest. He used to visit and read stories to me.”

In that moment I realized how profound Tutu’s simple question was. “Tell me who you are” is an invitation to discover who we are in oneness with others revealed through unexpected connecting stories. It is why the question matters for the sake of our well-being and that of the world. 

On the surface anyone might have assumed that there not much of a common thread to our lives. Yet his question revealed shared transformation, decades apart. 

On this new common ground he said that there would be a time for young men like me to go to jail for refusing to serve but that time was not now. He arranged for me to leave the country and within ten days I was on a flight to New York City.

So how do you respond to the question of “Tell me who you are” and what does it mean for your life?

Own the fullness of your story! When we are mindfully aware of the arc of our story it becomes an invitation to see the many threads woven together. Instead of banishing the painful or fearful experiences to a closet, choose a trusted guide or mentor to be authentic with. 

Tell your stories in a safe environment and listen to yourself with expectancy about what they reveal or point to. Your own courage will become a mirror to loving yourself.

The fear, loneliness and physical boundaries of the spinal surgeries could have handicapped my view of myself.  I could have chosen to live with anger, resentment or pity.  

Instead it offered me the gift of compassion and empathy towards others. Instead of youthful invincibility my awareness of the frailty of human life became an invitation to live life fully in every moment.

Most of us prefer the joyous, happy and wonderful experiences of our journey. Yet it is usually the challenging parts of our story that shed new light on how we choose to live with gratitude and delight. 

When you own the fullness of your story, the superficiality of “tell me what you do,” becomes a poor substitute for “tell me who you are” that reveals your richly textured life egging you on to live fully alive.

Listen with curiosity. Like the ever-expanding Universe, the arc of your story reveals new insights and wisdom in each new season of your life. 

Instead of living with regret, shame or embarrassment about some part of your story those defining experiences invite you to develop new tenderness and compassion toward yourself.

That combination of attentiveness and self-love takes you beyond self-absorption to a life that is enlivened by curiosity. You intuitively become engaged with others because you want to know what their story reveals. Like the unexpected connecting story that Tutu and I shared, you discover surprising connection with others. Like mine, your life is changed by those encounters.

Cultivate Awe.  Studies reveal that our capacity for awe expands our sense of fulfillment, meaning and satisfaction. When I experience awe in nature, music or a soaring architectural space I am awake to being part of the grandeur of life beyond any confines of my story.  Similarly, I am awed by the stories of those who know who they are.

Lives of courage and love filled with simple and seemingly small actions of hope leave me breathless! 

If I’m tempted to view my life as a series of obligations or something whose course is set, the stories of those who know who they are pull me back from that life-draining path.

Instead my awe finds expression in gratitude for the abundant generosity their lives point to. Awe becomes a pathway of celebrating our oneness.

In owning the fullness of your story with the companions of curiosity and awe your life is seen through a new lense. Instead of what you do, the knowledge of who you are transforms what it means to be human and fully alive. 

How will you choose?

Robert V. Taylor is the author of A New Way to Be Human: 7 Spiritual Pathways to Becoming Fully Alive (New Page Books 2012), a national speaker on questions of spirituality and religion, compassion and leading lives of purpose and meaning. He lives in Seattle and on a farm in rural Eastern Washington.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 14 tháng 4, 2013

Democrat changes story of Progress Kentucky members taping McConnell meeting

  • McConnell_fair.jpg

    FILE: May 22, 2012: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.,speaks following a weekly strategy meeting at the Capitol in Washington.AP

The Democrat who implicated two members of the liberal super PAC Progress Kentucky in the secret taping of a campaign strategy meeting for Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell is changing his story.

Jacob Conway, a member of the Jefferson County Democratic Executive Committee, said Friday he might have talked to only one of the men he accused, according to The Courier-Journal.

Conway told the newspaper he is certain he talked with volunteer Curtis Morrison about the recording but might not have spoken with Executive Director Shawn Reilly, contradicting what he said a day earlier.  

“I had a lot of conversations with both of them during that time period, and maybe I was just confused, and maybe Shawn never said anything,” Conway said.

On Tuesday, Mother Jones magazine released an audio file of the senator and aides discussing opposition research that included talk about then-potential Democratic candidate and actress Ashley Judd and her past bouts with depression.

The recording was purportedly made in a hallway outside McConnell’s Louisville headquarters.

Conway changed his story after a lawyer for Reilly said Conway lied about his client’s role. The lawyer also said Reilly had complied with FBI and U.S. attorney office probes.

The newspaper story also points out Conway made a plea agreement in 2006 to felony theft charges.

To read more from The Courier-Journal, click here:


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 3 tháng 4, 2013

A legal immigrant's story

  • 660-Ying-Ma.jpg

The middle-aged woman representing the American Consulate in Guangzhou, China, said something in English. We could not understand, so we turned to her colleague. He looked Chinese and was supposed to be her translator, but he only spoke our language haltingly. My father tried to help with what little English he knew, which consisted of not much more than “how are you” and “thank you.” My brother and I sat quietly and played our part as the well-behaved children of aspiring immigrants to America. My mother looked on nervously.

We lived in China’s third largest city. Chairman Mao had passed away nearly ten years ago but the stench of his failed totalitarian policies was still everywhere. We lived in an apartment that had no running hot water, no refrigerator, no telephone and no modern toilet facilities. 

We applied for immigration to the United States soon after China re-opened its economy to the world in the late 1970s. Now, after about four years of waiting, we had finally gotten to “the front of the line.” But on this day, it was not going to be good enough.

Since we believed that immigrating to America was a privilege, not a right, we did what America asked of us and tried to obtain the impossible.

After a few rounds of back and forth, the Chinese-looking man informed us that we would not be going to America, at least not yet. My mother started crying right on the spot. The middle-aged American woman shifted uncomfortably in her seat.

The Consulate wanted additional proof of my mother’s country of birth—she did not have a birth certificate. Children born in the chaos and poverty of the Third World often did not have the luxury of a birth certificate or the record-keeping habits of holding onto their proof of one.

My mother was born in a dusty and impoverished Indonesian town in the first half of the 20th century. She had disclosed her birthplace when my family first applied for immigration to the United States, and the Consulate accepted the relevant paperwork she provided without raising any objections.

But the Chinese-looking man and his colleague wanted the additional documentation now, and they spoke as if what they sought was easy to obtain. They instructed us to get affidavits from friends and neighbors in Indonesia who could attest to my mother’s place of birth. They were not swayed when we informed them that we knew no one in Indonesia anymore.

My mother left Indonesia for China when she was 10 and escaped one poor country for another. She never returned. 

Now that our family wanted to leave China for America, America would not let us, unless we delivered the affidavits its consular officers demanded. 

Since we believed that immigrating to America was a privilege, not a right, we did what America asked of us and tried to obtain the impossible. 

My mother searched her memory for anyone she could have known who still lived in Indonesia. She sent telegrams to individuals whose names she could barely remember and to addresses she knew were likely no longer valid. 

Our family bought expensive gifts for acquaintances who might travel to Indonesia, begging them to help us find our old friends and neighbors. 

In the end, we found nothing and no one. After each failed attempt—and many times in between, I saw my mother cry quietly in the living room.

Everyone we knew in China wanted to leave for America, and everyone who could leave had already left. 

The backwardness of China’s economy and the lingering cruelty of its policies from decades past were all reasons that fueled our desperation. For my parents, perhaps the biggest reason to leave were their two children, one in elementary school and one in junior high, who barely understood the stakes involved.  

We pursued our fruitless efforts to extract affidavits from Indonesia for months, and seeing that we were getting nowhere, the American Consulate finally relented. We were informed that if my mother could obtain affidavits from her siblings attesting to her birth in Indonesia, then America would consider that to be sufficient proof.

Yet collecting the relevant affidavits from my mother’s siblings turned out not to be trouble-free. Two of her siblings lived in Hong Kong, so we wrote letters beseeching them for their help. They encountered scheduling problems and one had health ailments that kept her from attending to our request. A simple task that could have taken a few weeks dragged on for about nine months.

We waited, wondering if our wait would ever end.

It did end, and after what appeared to be an eternity. When the affidavits were finally signed and delivered to the Consulate,. America in turn granted its formal approval of our immigration application, and we rushed to meet her, excitedly and legally.

This was how my family came to America. 

We did not disrespect U.S. borders, even though our dreams for a better life were no less desperate than many of those who are now illegally in this country. 

Instead, we waited, filled out every form and followed every rule. 

We did not believe that we should show up here illegally, and then once we were here long enough, demand that America grant us legal status or even citizenship-- simply because we were already here and too many others have come here illegally just like us. 

We could not have known that we would have a U.S. president who likes to dole out government goodies to win an election, even when one of those goodies include is the precious commodity of the right to live and work in the United States. 

We could not have expected that the Republican Party would fold like a cheap deck of cards as soon as they saw the cost of not engaging in the same type of racial pandering and political giveaway. 

We certainly did not think that we were entitled to the generosity and kindness of the American people, who simply do not have the stomach to break up families and deport millions of people who had violated U.S. laws. 

So, we chose the path that we chose.

In the years since our arrival in America, after we became U.S. citizens, we attempted to bring to America my aunt in China whom we loved dearly. By then, the immigration lines for family reunification had grown much longer, and the wait for my aunt—from application to approval—would last take over ten years. 

We waited again, as America had told us to, but this time, it indeed would not be good enough. With just a few years left in the immigration lines, my aunt, an able-bodied woman in her forties, passed away after a short battle with cancer. 

Before she fell ill, she had the resources to travel to America and overstay her visa. She did not—and we would not have let her—because it was against America’s immigration laws. 

So we waited for the happy day when she would finally joined us here in the United States. That day never came. We ran out of time, and America’s illegal immigration population grew.  

We could have made a different set of choices, but having made the choices that we did, we certainly would not accuse those who believe in enforcing the country’s immigration laws of  being anti-immigrant or anti-Hispanic. We can only hope that policymakers in Washington would not view protecting U.S. borders as a quaint notion that is no longer worthy of a robust defense.

Ying Ma is a policy advisor at the Heartland Institute and the author of "Chinese Girl in the Ghetto." Her website is yingma.org. Follow her on Twitter @GZtoGhetto.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 24 tháng 3, 2013

The Passover story begins with women

  • Passover Maxwell Hous_Gast.jpg

    FILE: March 15, 2011: A 1936 Maxwell House Haggadah alongside a Seder plate in New York.(AP Photo/Stace Maude)

When does the liberation from Egyptian slavery begin? Most would say with Moses. Yet long before he learned how to speak truth to power, there was a young girl whose daring act paved the way for Moses.

Imagine the conditions depicted in the biblical book of Exodus: Pharaoh had decreed the death of all Hebrew male babies. The entire socioeconomic and political system he constructs aims at the destruction of a people. Yet at every step of the way, women flout his edict, collaborating across divisions of class, religion, and ethnicity in their insubordinate solidarity. 

First, two midwives refuse to comply with the law of the land and let the boys live. Next, when Pharaoh commands that all male children be thrown into the Nile, a mother cleverly seeks to preserve the life of her baby boy by hiding him in a watertight basket. After all, Pharaoh didn’t say anything about a PFD (“Personal Flotation Device”) when ordering boys to be cast into the river.

Although we often remember the exodus as beginning with Moses, the biblical author points to Miriam, and her courageous action, as the point of departure for this story of liberation.

Then even Pharaoh’s own daughter defies his deadly command when she happens to discover the baby in the basket. She knows he is one of the persecuted. “This is one of the Hebrew children!” she announces. Yet instead of carrying out her father’s orders, she takes pity on him.

It is at this turning point that a young girl undertakes a fateful intervention. As the baby’s sister, she had stationed herself on the banks of the river to see what would happen to the child. When Pharaoh’s daughter discovers him, this girl might have expected the worst. But instead of fleeing, she fearlessly approaches the princess with a daring and unsolicited proposition:  “Shall I go and get for you a nurse from the Hebrew women to nurse the child for you?”

Notice the double mention of “for you.” Did the princess ever contemplate taking the boy as her own?  Or does this girl (who shrewdly doesn’t identify herself as the baby’s sister), open the princess’s eyes to a new possibility, and show how it can be realized? We cannot know. But in either case, the sister found a way to connect to this woman’s sense of compassion—and turn it into life-sustaining action. Working together, these women defy Pharaoh’s decree of death.

As a result, the child is nursed by his own mother, and eventually brought to the palace as the adopted son of the Pharaoh’s daughter. The child is none other than Moses, the one who will lead his people to freedom. His sister, the young girl, is named Miriam. But although we often remember the exodus as beginning with Moses, the biblical author points to Miriam, and her courageous action, as the point of departure for this story of liberation.

Consider the details and their significance: No one tells Miriam to take responsibility for the child. The mother disappears after one last act of desperation, placing the baby in the water. It is the sister who miraculously turns this act of desperation into a moment of salvation. But this young girl has more than courage. She also has wisdom. Seeing a spark of sympathy in another human being—in Pharaoh's own daughter no less!—she is able to connect with it and kindle it, to fan it into a life-giving flame.

Miriam’s world is one in which social, political, and economic structures are all designed to oppress the body and crush the spirit. It is a dehumanizing world. But the abuse fails to vanquish her faith in humanity.   

The first miracle of the exodus is the triumph of the spirit—the ability to remain human under such inhuman conditions, to recognize compassion in the face of the other, to muster human resources for the purpose of defending the vulnerable, and to act boldly in resistance to brutal laws. Miriam’s refusal to relinquish her humanity or discount that of Pharaoh’s daughter is an act of freedom that opens a path to collective liberation and to an exodus from an old order.

Dr. Jacob L. Wright  is Professor of Hebrew Bible at Emory University.

Dr. Jacob L. Wright  is Professor of Hebrew Bible at Emory University.

Dr. Tamara Cohn Eskenazi is Professor of Bible Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion.


View the original article here

Thứ Năm, 21 tháng 3, 2013

Documentary 'MURPH: The Protector' tells true story of hero soldier in Afghanistan

  • murph the protector 660.jpg

It’s not your typical Hollywood fare, but “MURPH: The Protector” is bound to tug at every heartstring.

This new feature-length documentary tells the emotional, true life tale of fallen U.S. Navy SEAL Lt. Michael Murphy, a young serviceman who gave his life to save his brothers in combat during a 2005 operation in Afghanistan. Patched together by personal memories voiced from those closest to him, the film paints a picture of a hero far beyond Tinseltown’s fictionalized accounts.

“There is a lack of family-safe material that shows the good side of man,” director Scott Mactavish told FOX411’s Pop Tarts column. “I hope viewers have a greater appreciation of the sacrifices made not only by the troops, but of those made by their friends and family back home. SEALs aren’t comic book characters. They are real men with families, friends and lives outside the military. They come in all shapes and sizes, but are all incredibly driven and committed.”

Fondly referred to by his peers and loved ones as “Murph,” the New York-raised, Penn State graduate declined law school offers to instead serve his country. In 2005, Lt. Murphy was put in-charge of a four-man SEAL element in support of Operation Red Wing, tasked with finding important anti-coalition militia commander. While in the objective area, the SEALs were detected by goat herders and an intense gun battle was soon ignited with a much larger enemy force. Realizing that it was impossible to make contact with headquarters while firing back from the protection of mountain terrain, Murphy unhesitatingly moved out into prime target view so he could use his satellite device and call in help for his team.

While continuing to be fired upon, as detailed in “MURPH: The Protector,” Murphy made contact with the SOF Quick Reaction Force and provided his unit’s location. A shot in the back caused him to fall and drop the transmitter, and yet he picked it back up and calmly completed the call as the enemy -- and its weaponry -- closed in.

“Roger that, sir,” were his final words once he had given all the necessarily details. “And thank you.”

Murphy’s selfless act attracted great attention at the time, and he was posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor in 2007. But turning the moving account into a motion picture proved no easy task.

“This story is incredibly compelling and therefore easy to tell,” Mactavish explained. “But as a non-Hollywood guy, fundraising was incredibly difficult.”

Yet if all goes well during the film’s theatrical run, the filmmakers hope to finalize a deal to make the movie available on military bases, in addition to a foreign distribution deal. A portion of the proceeds from the film will go to Lt. Michael P. Murphy Memorial Scholarship Foundation, which was formed by his family after his death in 2005.

But above all, the forces behind the film simply hope that audiences gain a deeper understanding of who we should really be revering here in America.

“It is nice in this age of the generating of celebrities and people that have contributed nothing to this world, that someone like Michael Murphy, someone who is such a ridiculously, unbelievable individual, now has people looking up to him,” one of his friends says in the documentary. “He is the type of person people should look up to, and that they should name things after.”

“MURPH: The Protector” premieres at select Regal Entertainment Group Theaters on Friday, March 22nd.

MURPH: The Protector - Official Trailer [HD] from Mactavish Pictures on Vimeo.


View the original article here