Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn America. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn America. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Chủ Nhật, 12 tháng 5, 2013

10 Most exciting cities to live in America

  • Movoto_PortlandWiki660.jpg

    No. 10: Portland, OR.Movoto Blog/Wikipedia

If you’re feeling curious, take a poll of your friends and ask them what U.S. city is the most exciting. We’re willing to bet that the majority of them will come back to you with the same answer: New York City. The Big Apple. The City That Never Sleeps. There are more than enough reasons to support this notion. New York City is large and crammed with people and things to do. In fact, most of the Movoto bloggers thought that New York City was, if not the most exciting, definitely one of the most exciting places to be in America.

But -- and we’re sure you saw this coming -- it turned out we were wrong. New York City, while in the top 10 most exciting places to live, is not No. 1. In fact, The Big Apple doesn’t even crack the top five most exciting places to live, according to a survey Movoto recently undertook. That honor goes to another well-known city, one we are more than happy to share with you: Oakland.

How did we decide this? Recently, we got to thinking about cities and what makes them exciting and interesting places to live. We compiled a list of criteria and set out to determine which U.S. cities have the most zest for life (a full explanation of which can be found below). Here’s our list:

  1. Oakland, CA
  2. Boston, MA
  3. San Francisco, CA
  4. Seattle, WA
  5. Washington, D.C.
  6. New York, NY
  7. Milwaukee, WI
  8. Atlanta, GA
  9. Philadelphia, PA
  10. Portland, OR

That’s quite a list. These are all large cities, some of which are already known for their culture. Still, after looking at our top 10 list and scratching our head, we were still surprised that NYC didn’t rank higher.

If you’re interested in learning how we developed our top 10 list, we break down the methodology and reasoning below. Or, if you’re into quick-and-dirty lunchtime reading, jump on over to some of our other top 10 posts such as “Where Fashion Dies: The 10 Worst Dressed Cities” or “The 10 Nerdiest Cities in America.”

How’d We Come Up With Our List?

To formulate our list, we first had to decide on 10 criteria we feel make a city exciting. This isn’t a perfect definition, but you can think of our list as ways to fight that ever-present boredom everyone faces at some point or another. We then surveyed each city based on these criteria using various websites such as Yelp and Yellow Pages. Depending on the category (below) we looked at a criterion on a per person or per square mile basis. To be very clear, we looked at each individual city’s size; this excludes suburbs or nearby cities. In other words, it’s not covering an entire metro area.

These are the 10 criteria we surveyed:

  1. Park acreage per person
  2. Percent of population between 20 and 34 years old
  3. Fast food restaurants per square mile (the fewer the better)
  4. Bars per square mile
  5. Big box stores per square mile (the fewer the better)
  6. Population diversity
  7. Movie theaters per square mile
  8. Museums per square mile
  9. Theater companies per square mile
  10. Music venues per square mile

Once we compiled our criteria, we surveyed the 50 most populous cities across the country, ranking them from 1 to 50 based on each individual criterion. Cities with the lowest average rank across all categories placed highest. We’ll go through each criterion individually.

Park Acres Per Person

Parks are exciting. You can walk; you can hike; you can jog. We looked at the amount of park acres per person because we felt that everyone needs a place to reconnect with nature, go for a picnic, or play a quick pickup game. Virginia Beach took the top spot in this category.

Population Age

We know we’ll hear some complaints about this one. We’re prepared. We looked at the percent of the city’s population between the ages of 20 and 34 years old. We aren’t saying that older residents are boring, but a younger population does tend to be more excitable. Columbus, one of our favorite cities in the country, ranked highest in this category. Our assumption is that this has to do The Ohio State University’s massive number of coeds.

Fast Food Restaurants Per Square Mile

This is a broad category. Our general thought was that fast food joints, while convenient, stifle an area’s visual appeal (and palate). In other words, a McDonald’s on every corner is about as exciting as a shot of warm milk before bed. What makes a place unique and exciting is diversity; this includes different types of restaurants. Let us also remember that in most cases fast food is its own special type of bland. That, my friends, is booooring.

For this category we researched the five largest fast food chains in the country, added up their stores, and then calculated how many chains there were per square mile in each of the cities. For those interested, the most plentiful stores are, in order: Subway, McDonald’s, Starbucks, Pizza Hut, and Burger King. El Paso, which has graced our lists before, won this category with the fewest fast food location per square mile.

Bars Per Square Mile

Think of this category as a significant part of a city’s nightlife. Yes, you can get a cocktail or brewski at one of these fine establishments, but just as importantly you can meet up with friends. Bars provide a place to hang out after work, and, in our experience, increase a city’s appeal. San Francisco easily took the No. 1 spot. This wasn’t surprising, since similar surveys have hinted that San Fran loves its booze.

Big Box Stores Per Square Mile

Big box stores aren’t necessarily bad -- but they are boring. Dozens of giant, plain square structures and parking lots definitely takes away from an area’s visual appeal. In this instance, we looked at the number of big box stores per square mile. Specifically, we counted the number of Targets and Walmarts in an area. This was easy; neither Detroit nor Boston have a Target or Walmart in the city proper. (Remember, this doesn’t mean they aren’t in the suburbs.)

Population Diversity

Diversity matters because it helps perpetuate different thoughts. If you want a city to be exciting, it needs diversity. For this category, we used Census data to examine each city’s demographics. We looked at each city’s race/ethnicity data. We ranked each city by researching a city’s dominant ethnicity. The smaller a city’s majority race, the higher the score. Oakland just beat out San Jose in this category.

Movie Theaters Per Square Mile

Why do movies matter? They’re social lubricant. If you put two people in a room who have nothing in common except for one movie, they’ll be able to find something to talk about. In our opinion, cities need movie theatres. In the summer, a trip to the theater will garner some Michael Bay explosions. In the winter, you’ll get your highbrow Oscar contenders. The whole year round they’re great spots to take a date. According to our survey, Oakland took the top spot in this category.

Museums Per Square Mile

The general idea for this piece is “the more to do, the better.” This includes taking trips to museums to get your learning on. It doesn’t matter what type of museum -- and there are many, many crazy museums -- it just matters that these places attempt to instill some sort of knowledge in visitors. When it’s raining on a Saturday, your choices are either a movie or a museum. If you want to keep people around, you need these establishments. Again, Oakland is at the head of the class in this respect.

Theater Companies Per Square Mile

Theater, with a capital T, sometimes gets a bad rap. There are theater snobs out there, but that’s true for everything. Most theater companies are small groups of people who put on performances because they love putting on performances. A lot of us in the Movoto office have found memories of watching productions by small theater companies. If a city wants to keep people around, it needs to support the arts. Theater companies are a good place to start. In this category Oakland snuck by Minneapolis to take the No. 1 position.

Music Venues Per Square Mile

If you want to have a good time, try dancing. Recorded music is great, but there’s something electrifying about live music. That’s why we added this criterion to our ranking. We found that San Francisco has the most music venues on a per square mile basis. Why? There are probably two reasons. The first is that San Francisco is a relatively small city. The second is that San Fran is well known as an artist conclave.

The Takeaway

When we think of an exciting place to live, we think about places where there is always something to do -- whether it’s eating at new restaurants or jogging through a park. This sounds a lot like Oakland, so we really weren’t that surprised. But Milwaukee? It looks like we’ll need to take a trip to the Badger State.

Related:

Click to view original post.


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 7 tháng 5, 2013

America picks newest Lay's Potato Chip flavor: Cheesy Garlic Bread

  • lays_cheesy_garlic_bread.jpg

    Cheesy Garlic Bread beat out Chicken & Waffles and Sriracha as winner of Lay's "Do Us A Flavor" contest.Lays

The votes have been tallied and America has spoken.  Lay's has a new potato chip flavor: Cheesy Garlic Bread.

The new chip is a result from Lay's' "Do Us A Flavor" contest where the company released three crazy flavors of potato chips and had the people decide which one they liked best.

Karen Weber-Mendham of Land O'Lakes, Wis. was the brainchild of the fan favorite Cheesy Garlic Bread, beating out Chicken and Waffles and Sriracha. Weber-Mendham  gets $1 million in grand prize money or one percent of her flavor's 2013 net sales (whichever is higher). The chips will now go on sale nationwide for the rest of 2013.

Lay's "Do Us A Flavor" contest runs all over the world and has had some pretty interesting suggested flavors, including Walkie Talkie Chicken, Chilli & Chocolate, Late Night Kebob-- even Cajun Squirrel.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 5 tháng 5, 2013

America must see Gosnell evil, so that we may rid ourselves of it

We can be judged in many ways.  One measure of a civilization’s morality is how it treats those without power.  

Pope John Paul II once said, “a society will be judged on the basis of how it treats its weakest members; and among the most vulnerable are surely the unborn and the dying.”  

As I write these words 7 women and 5 men are deliberating the fate of a man accused of killing our country’s most weak and most vulnerable.  The alleged crimes are horrific and difficult to imagine, but they must be shown to the world.  We cannot turn away because a topic is unpleasant or vile. Why? Because one way to rid our society of evil is to confront it boldly.

I have seen and heard my share of evil, but the Gosnell trial has tested my faith in humanity.

The man standing in judgment is Dr. Kermit Gosnell.  His trial, in Philadelphia, went to the jury this week. The charges being considered number in the hundreds, but it is the four first-degree murder charges and a single third-degree murder charge that have left me bewildered and saddened.

Dr. Gosnell ran what became known as the “House of Horror.”  An abortion clinic where he is accused of killing 3 babies, born alive, during late-term abortions.  He faces the third-degree murder charge for the killing of 41-year-old Karnamaya Monga.  

Many of you may not have heard about this case.  It has the dubious distinction of being one crime story the mainstream media isn’t all over. It is an “abortion story,” the one topic that defies the media’s “if it bleeds, it leads” mantra.  

Whether it is the gruesome details of how these children were allegedly killed or that the case involves the politically inconvenient topic the courtroom seats reserved for the media went largely unused.

I have sat in those seats and witnessed court testimony so heartbreaking and abhorrent that it could easily be mistaken for the most horrible of fictions.  

Sadly, as a seasoned prosecutor, I know what dark acts people are capable of.  I have seen and heard my share of evil, but this trial has tested my faith in humanity.  It has been eye-opening and life changing.

Tonight at 9 p.m. ET on the Fox News Channel we are airing a Fox News Reporting  investigation on these crimes. I participated in our special investigation. It will not be easy to watch.  It will bring many to tears and fill others with anger.  However difficult it may be I urge you to watch.  Information is power; it is the light that will “shine through the darkness.”

Watch "Fox News Reporting: See No Evil – The Kermit Gosnell Case," Friday, May 3 at 9 p.m. ET on Fox News Channel.

Kimberly Guilfoyle is co-host of "The Five" on the Fox News Channel and a Fox News legal analyst. Prior to her broadcasting career, she served as an assistant district attorney at the San Francisco and Los Angeles District Attorney's Offices.

 


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 3 tháng 5, 2013

On National Day of Prayer, America needs prayer like never before

When Shirley Dobson, the wife of James Dobson, asked me to be the Honorary Chairman of the National Day of Prayer Task Force, I wondered at first if she was talking to the right person. I was so humbled, and of course I agreed.

Why? Because America needs prayer like never before.

In fact, I think the answers to our deepest needs as a nation are spiritual, not political.

We need divine intervention, and if we don’t receive it, we are in for some very dark days indeed. The United States needs another spiritual awakening or, as it is often called, a revival.

Despite the fact that we, as a nation, have largely forgotten God, the good news is: God has not forgotten us.

What is a revival? Revival means to restore something to its original condition.

Perhaps we cannot say that America is a completely Christian country, as it would seem everyone in it would need to believe in Jesus Christ to make that qualification. However, there is no denying that this country has a Judeo-Christian foundation.

But we have gotten too far from that. In the words of President Abraham Lincoln, “We have forgotten God.” We see trouble in our culture today. We see the breakdown of the family, crippling addictions, and random acts of horrific violence.

We have done our best to remove God’s Word and His counsel from our courtrooms, classrooms, and culture. Despite the fact that we, as a nation, have largely forgotten God, the good news is: God has not forgotten us. He still can bless and redeem our country.

One of the reasons I know that is because He redeemed me. 

I never knew my father. My mother was an alcoholic who married and divorced seven times. I smoked pot, dropped acid, and drank my problems away. But God got hold of me and my life was turned around.

And if there’s redemption for me and my situation, there is redemption for everyone and everything.

I think a lot of the problems in America started back in the 1960s, when I was a kid. That experimentation of the ‘60s has turned into an epidemic in the 21st century. 

Sociologist Robert Nesbet wrote, “The ideologies which gained entry into the academy in the ‘60s claim that fundamental intellectual principles of Western culture were illegitimate and must be overthrown. And with that we destroyed terms like truth, good, and evil.”

People laugh at the Christian worldview today. Up is down. Right is wrong. Wrong is right. So in our schools, evolution is taught as fact even though it is disputed in the scientific community. And yet they will not even consider teaching the biblical truth of creationism.

We basically teach our children that they crawled out of the ooze. They are highly evolved animals. Thus there is no God, there is no afterlife, and there is no final judgment. And then we scratch our heads and wonder what is happening when a kid gets a gun and walks onto a campus and starts shooting people.

And the pundits and the experts opine away and everyone asks why. And my question is, “Well, why not?” If there is no right and wrong, if there is no good and evil, if there is no God, why would we expect people to live morally?

To quote Lincoln again, “We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us and we have vainly imagined in the deceitfulness of our heart that all of these blessings that we see in our country were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own.”

That’s why the only hope is not merely a return to conservative values; it is a return to the biblical truth that we find only in the pages of Scripture.

If we want to see our nation turn back to righteousness, then we must pray. Please join me in doing that on May 2, the National Day of Prayer.

Pastor Greg Laurie is the Honorary Chairman of the National Day of Prayer Task Force and the founder of the Harvest Crusades. Harvest America 2013 will be simulcast live from Philadelphia on Sept. 28–29.


View the original article here

Thứ Năm, 25 tháng 4, 2013

America, there is hope in courageous Boston bombing survivor's story

Her name is Kaitlynn Cates, and she is a 25 year old woman who was standing at the finish line of the Boston Marathon two weeks ago when the first bomb went off, blowing her into the air and damaging her right leg. 

She told me she was bleeding profusely and she thought she might not survive. Then her friend Leo took off his T-shirt and used it to put pressure on the wound, stopping the bleeding as he lifted her into his arms and carried her to his car. From there he drove her the wrong way down one way streets to Massachusetts General Hospital.

It is a storybook tale that will have a happy ending even amidst the fear and dark feelings that the terrorists have elicited in all of us. “I never looked back,” she said to me, almost biblically. “I’m definitely going to rise above this. There’s always going to be a scar. But I’m not going to let them win. I’m not going to let them stop me from living a normal, healthy, happy life.” 

I spoke with Kaitlynn in her room at the hospital with Leo by her side and found her to be upbeat, strong, and looking forward to a complete recovery.

Unfortunately, not all of the survivors of the tragedy are as fortuitous, and for many it will be many months of agonizing physical and psychotherapy before they achieve what doctors call “the new normal.”

After the Boston Marathon attacks Americans should focus on a story of courage and hope like Kaitlynn Cates’ and a story of commitment and skill like Dr. King’s.

Kaitlynn was already thinking clearly and purposefully in her hospital room, but the most underreported story following the Boston Marathon bombings are likely to be Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, which will surface in the months to come. 

Many patients who injured their brains from the blast don’t know it yet. There is an epidemic (close to half a million patients) among veterans of the wars who are suffering from TBI or PTSD.
Dr. David King, top trauma surgeon at Massachusetts General Hospital who served in Iraq, ran in the Marathon, finished in three hours, and then turned right around and began operating on survivors at the hospital. For those who suffered shrapnel wounds, King and others were able to save their legs through multiple operations. 

King told me that almost all the patients who didn’t require amputations initially won’t need them now thanks to the latest surgical techniques though they will require extensive rehabilitation. He said that more than a decade of war have led to all major trauma surgeons being familiar with these new methods.

A good treatment for all the fear and worry in America right now because of the terror attack and concern over future attacks is to focus on a story of courage and hope like Kaitlynn Cates’ and a story of commitment and skill like Dr. King’s.

In the end, the American spirit still has the power and the flexibility to overcome terror in all its guises.

Dr. Marc Siegel is an associate professor of medicine and medical director of Doctor Radio at NYU Langone Medical Center. He is a member of the Fox News Medical A Team and author of several books, including "False Alarm; the Truth About the Epidemic of Fear"; He is also the author of "Swine Flu and Bird Flu." His most recent book is  The Inner Pulse: Unlocking the Secret Code of Sickness and Health. 


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 24 tháng 4, 2013

Media blame America for Boston bombings, ignore ties to radical Islam

Comedian George Carlin famously joked about the seven words you couldn’t say on air. Add two more – “Islam” and “Muslim” – but only if you use them in a negative context. 

In the week following the terror attack on the Boston Marathon, lefties and their media clones have been desperate to point out the attack had nothing to do with those two scary words.

After all, journalists and pundits have had time to reflect on the bombing – from the safety of their posh offices and not Boston’s crowded hospitals. The brothers were just poor and misunderstood. It can’t be their fault.

The Brothers Tsarnaev have set media tongues a-wagging looking for someone to blame other than Muslims – like Americans.  

Famed newsman Tom Brokaw took up the blame America crusade on Sunday's NBC “Meet the Press,” discussing “motivation” like he was in an entry-level acting class.

Today in American we have a media so obsessed with feeling good about themselves, that America can’t have a conversation about the dangers of radical Islam.

According to Brokaw, we’re to blame. “I think we also have to examine the use of drones that the United States is involved in and – and there are a lot of civilians who are innocently killed in a drone attack in Pakistan, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq.” 

Why? American “presumptuousness,” a crime which now merits the death penalty in certain Islamic circles.

The Washington post claimed on Tuesday that “Boston Marathon bombing suspects elude labels.” Oh? How about radical Islamic terrorists? Radical Muslim terrorists? 

According to AP, “U.S. officials said Tuesday, adding another piece to the body of evidence they say suggests the two brothers were motivated by an anti-American, radical version of Islam.”

The media felt they knew better. 

At MSNBC, they must be hanging gymnastics medals after the contortions it put its staff through.

When MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow asked a Georgetown professor about “some radicalized YouTube clips” on the older brother’s YouTube page, she received a classic response. 

Prof. Charles King told her: “Well, and keep in mind that on his, on the elder brother's, Tamerlan's YouTube channel, there are an equal number of rap videos.” When Georgetown professors start commenting on the content of rap videos, it’s fair to say they’re clueless. Or tragically unhip.

Another MSNBC host continued that smokescreen theme, comparing the bombers to famous murderers. 

On Tuesday, Alex Wagner said if the brothers had acted alone, “it ends debate regarding whether to try him as an enemy combatant,” wrote Mediaite. “With no ties to foreign terrorist networks, there would be little difference between him and so-called homegrown and lone wolf terrorists including Timothy McVeigh and Ted Kaczynski.” Only neither of those was motivated by a global belief system linked to hundreds or thousands of terror attacks.

Perhaps, instead of being PC, they might address the issue of radical Islam, especially since two Muslim men were just arrested for a Canadian terror plot. 

The media are doing law-abiding American Muslims no favors by refusing to acknowledge a problem – radical Islam – that threatens them as well. But note the term, “radical Islam.” 

It is not being overly PC to admit that millions of American Muslims don’t go blowing up their neighbors. Since I have Muslim neighbors, I appreciate that fact.

On Monday, Politico’s Josh Gerstein claimed that “the Boston Marathon bombing suspects’ geopolitical leanings are still largely a mystery.” 

He clearly didn’t watch a week filled with news where we learned the older of the Tsarnaev brothers had visited Russia’s terrorist-filled Dagestan. And that Russia had asked the U.S. to investigate his ties to radical Islam. Oopsie.

One of The Atlantic’s “reporters” even did her best to minimize the skill of the terrorists to downplay the attack. “The more we learn of Boston bombers the more they seem like bumblers. And there's the rub: any idiot can terrorize, doesn't require genius,” tweeted Garance Franke-Ruta Tuesday. 

Boston health authorities say 264 people were treated at local hospitals, along three killed. 

Evil? Yes! Bumblers? Hardly.

Then there were those who couldn’t let that old crisis go to waste. So they used a terror attack on Americans to promote...gun control. New Yorker editor David Remnick told the “Charlie Rose” show that guns were part of the problem. 

“We see yet another act which might have been a Hell of a lot more difficult to pull off with effective gun control.” Remnick is a Pulitzer Prize winner. Unsurprisingly, he didn’t get it in logic.

Even my friend, lefty radio host Thom Hartmann used the bombing to attack “all forms of religious fundamentalism that lead to violence.” Thom, like most liberals, isn’t especially tolerant of religion and said this was “a good opportunity for us to have a conversation about modernity versus Bronze Age gods.” Nothing says open-mindedness like calling Christianity “Bronze Age gods.”

What it all adds up to, is a media so obsessed with feeling good about themselves, that America can’t have a conversation about the dangers of radical Islam. It’s a world tailor made for people like nutty columnist David Sirota (OK, that’s like saying “wet ocean”). Sirota, you’ll recall, hoped that the bombers might be “a white American.”

As it turns out, it didn’t matter. The media just report what they want anyhow.

Dan Gainor is the Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Center’s Vice President for Business and Culture. He writes frequently about media for Fox News Opinion. He can also be contacted on Facebook and Twitter as dangainor.


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 16 tháng 4, 2013

Boston attack underscores growing threat of IEDs in America

The deadly bomb attack on the Boston Marathon highlights what may be a growing threat to American cities -- the use of IEDs to target large gatherings, inflicting mass damage with a device that is difficult to detect. 

Security experts say the use of IEDs is becoming a preferred tool of terror in both domestic and global attacks -- or attempted attacks -- against the United States. 

"The reason to use an IED or multiple IEDs is that you're trying to create an oversized impact, and as much panic and disruption as possible," Bill Braniff, the executive director of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, told FoxNews.com Tuesday. 

The FBI and Department of Homeland Security on Tuesday sent an intelligence bulletin to law enforcement across the country noting that the Boston attack follows a pattern. 

"The activities in Boston highlight the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) to target large gatherings, including at special events, in order to inflict mass casualties," said the bulletin, obtained by Fox News. 

IEDs are usually makeshift bombs that are extremely destructive when detonated. They are designed to propel shrapnel and are sometimes used in combination with toxic chemicals, radiological material or biological toxins, and are often packed with metal fragments. This pattern of terror has been seen on a global level for years but is becoming more common in the U.S.   

In recent years, several of these attacks have been plotted but not successfully carried out.   

The DHS/FBI bulletin highlighted the following plots since 2009: 

  • In 2011, authorities discovered an undetonated IED along the planned Martin Luther King Jr. unity parade route in Spokane, Wash. 
  • In November 2010, FBI agents and the Portland police stopped a Somali teenager's plan to blow up a van full of explosives at a Christmas tree lighting ceremony. Dwight Holton, U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon, said at the time that the "defendant's chilling determination is a stark reminder that there are people -- even here in Oregon -- who are determined to kill Americans." 
  • In May 2010, New York authorities thwarted an attempt to detonate an IED left in a smoking Nissan Pathfinder in Times Square. The crude car bomb of propane, gasoline and fireworks was discovered by authorities and quick-thinking vendors. 
  • Nine months earlier in 2009, New York City police stopped a plot to blow up the city's subways using IEDs. 

The bombing Monday shattered what may have been a false sense of security, after law enforcement successfully foiled plots year after year. 

In the attack, two IEDs went off back-to-back near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, killing three and injuring more than 170 others. Reports say the bombs were made out of pressure cookers and packed with ball bearings, nails and other metal scraps that blew dangerous debris in every direction. It's a pattern of terror security experts have documented in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. They say it was only a matter of time before the devices made their way here. 

"Most people in law enforcement believed we would see these IEDs begin emerging in the U.S.," Craig Dotlo, a retired FBI agent who helped investigate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, said. 

According to a recent report by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, IEDs were the most common weapons used in the 207 terrorist plots and attacks in the United States from 2001 to 2011. The study also found that incendiary devices accounted for more than half of all weapons used over the last decade, representing a large increase in the type of weapons used in terror attacks. 

The perpetrators are often domestic groups -- with the environmental Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front responsible for the most attacks in that 10-year window, according to the report. Al Qaeda was involved in four of them. The Pakistani Taliban claimed involvement in the Times Square bombing case -- but has said it had no role in the Boston attack Monday. 

Authorities are still searching for suspects in the latest attack. President Obama said Tuesday that while the strike was an "act of terrorism," it's not clear whether a foreign or domestic group or individual was behind it. 

"At this time there are no claims of responsibility," FBI officials said in a press conference Tuesday. "The range of suspects and motives remains wide open." 

The dual devices used in Monday's marathon bombing in Massachusetts are similar to those used in attacks in Sri Lanka in 2008 as well as a series of blasts in Lahore, Pakistan in 2006. 

IEDs were also used in attacks in Ireland in May 1998, May 2003 and May 2005.  


View the original article here

Thứ Hai, 15 tháng 4, 2013

Get the strike fighter experience in Latin America at the LAAD 2013 defense show

  • The Boeing Super Hornet.jpg

    A Boeing Super Hornet in transit to Denmark in 2009, flying with the Royal Danish Air Force.The Boeing Company

Want to know what it feels like to fly a U.S. strike fighter in aerial combat? Then Rio de Janeiro is the place for you -- well, it was, anyway.

With the U.S. military suffering under sequestration, American defense giants and their fellows from around the world converged on Rio de Janeiro to win business from the ever-growing Latin American military budgets at the biannual LAAD 2013 defense show, which ran April 9 - 12.

Want to fly a U.S. strike fighter?
Boeing played it very smart and made the Super Hornet experience available to potential buyers and mere attendees of the show. A finalist in Brazil’s F-X2 fighter competition, the Super Hornet is in service with the U.S. Navy and the Royal Australian Air Force.

While Boeing also brought unmanned systems, it was the company’s Super Hornet simulator that demonstrated both single-seat E and two-seat F model capabilities that made a big splash.

Potential buyers could jump in and hone their takeoff and landing skills not just on a runway, but also an aircraft carrier.

The simulator included a front and rear cockpit where you could even have a go at air-to-ground targeting and aerial combat.

Robots
Robots are always crowd-pleasers, and Northrop Grumman featured robots big and small at the show.

On the larger side, Northrop also brought the mid-sized vehicle CaMeL, short for Carry-all Mechanized Equipment Landrover, essentially an unmanned ground vehicle.

Capable of carrying 1,000 pound of equipment, CaMeL is used for a range of tasks from lightening a dismounted soldier’s load to mine clearing and casualty evacuations.

This clever CaMeL can also be used as a retransmission platform, a robotic weapon system or for ammo, food and water resupply.

It runs on both a battery and diesel and can travel at speeds of 5 mph over varied terrain. Power efficient, this robot can provide about 20 hours of continuous operations on 3.5 gallons of fuel.

On the other hand, the tiny, 23-inch high Titus -- one of the company’s new unmanned ground vehicles -- can be controlled with a something similar to a gaming console. Particularly handy for those hard to reach places, it can navigate narrow 16-inch pathways and move at a speed of 7.5 mph.

Location, location, location
Impossible to miss smack dab in the entry to the most bustling hall, BAE Systems secured prime real estate at LAAD 2013. It was one of the more convivial stands, which is hardly surprising given BAE’s ongoing wins with Brazilian armed forces.

Successes like the armored personnel carrier M113, acquired by the Brazilian Army, were prominently featured. Designed for rough terrain, high-speeds on roads and even amphibious operations, the M113 can carry thirteen including the driver.

A popular combat vehicle, there are more than 80,000 internationally with more than 44 countries.

Wolves, Hurricanes and more
A wide range of Israeli companies performed very well at LAAD, but it was Hatehof’s massive vehicles that were spotlight stealers.

Hatehof recently won domestic contracts with the Israeli police and Ministry of the Interior and featured a suite including the Wolf, Navigator and Hurricane.

Wolf was developed for the Israel Defense Forces for use in urban and challenging terrain missions. The 9 ton, armored four-by-four can carry up to nine soldiers.

The Navigator, a massive MRAP, weighs about 18.5 tons and carries up to 13 soldiers. It has a high level of protection of up to 14 kg for underbelly mines.

Navigator is designed to defend soldiers from IEDs and RPGs.  It has STANAG Level 3 protection and can be upgraded to Level 4.

On the lighter side at 9 tons, Hurricane is a more lightly armoured, lighter in weight vehicle with more maneuverability.

It can carry up to seven soldiers and also has a STANAG protection Level 3 with the potential to increase to Level 4.

Hatehof's Riot Control Vehicles have a pick and mix of configurations and add-ons including armored cabins, jamming systems and day and night cameras.

With these vehicles designed to defeat riots, a customer can also choose from an array of non-lethals such as water, dye, skunk, gas and foam.

Sky Nets and Battlefield Tactical Radar
Thales is dominating in Latin America sky nets - with 140 operational radars, 250 Navaids and 26 TopSky-ATC deployed in air traffic control and surveillance – they already cover more than half of the airspace.

France-based Thales has been building relationships with Latin America for more than four decades.

Focusing on combining radar and non-radar tech to optimize surveillance coverage, state of the art tech to improve safety was showcased including TopSky-Safety Nets for airspace and TopSky-Tower for the ground.

The joint-venture between Raytheon and Thales, ThalesRaytheonSystems, did a Latin reveal on their air defense tech the Ground Master 400.

The mobile long-range air defense 3-D radar with adaptable towers detects the full range of very high to very low altitudes. It is designed to track tough targets like drones, cruise missiles and aircraft flying at only several hundred feet above ground.  

With more than 600 systems in service internationally, the company says it is the world leader in battlefield tactical radars.

New to the party
Turkey and UAE are two recent additions to the largest defense exhibition in Latin America. This year UAE presence grew bringing fifteen companies at this year’s national pavilion including Tawazun, Sofia Trading, Emirates Advanced Investments Group and Advanced Integrated System.

Turkey brought ten defense companies across the spectrum from shipbuilding through to ammunition.

And then there was Pakistan
Pakistan made its debut this year at LAAD.

The largest state-owned defense conglomerate, Global Industrial & Defence Solutions, brought a range of unmanned aerial vehicles or “drones.” Remote controlled or self-controlled, these drones are designed for surveillance monitoring and other purposes.

They also featured their ANZA-MK II surface to air missiles, Baktar Shikan anti-tank guided missiles.

Ballet dancer turned defense specialist Allison Barrie has traveled around the world covering the military, terrorism, weapons advancements and life on the front line. You can reach her at wargames@foxnews.com or follow her on Twitter @Allison_Barrie.


View the original article here

Thứ Năm, 4 tháng 4, 2013

When the government goes bankrupt -- what Stockton's plight means for America

What happens when the government goes bankrupt? This question is one that sounds like a hypothetical exercise in a law school classroom from just a few years ago, where it might have been met with some derision. But today, it is a realistic and terrifying inquiry that many who have financial relationships with governments in America will need to make, and it will be answered with the gnashing of teeth.

Earlier this week, a federal judge accepted the bankruptcy petition of Stockton, Calif., a city of about 300,000 residents northeast of San Francisco, over the objections of those who had loaned money to the city. The lenders -- called bondholders -- and their insurers saw this coming when the city stopped paying interest on their loans -- called bonds. In this connection, a bond is a loan made to a municipality, which pays the lender tax-free interest and returns the principal when it is due. Institutional lenders usually obtain insurance, which guarantees the repayment but puts the insurance carrier on the hook.

The due dates of many of these bonds have come and gone, and the bondholders and their insurers want Stockton to repay the loans. But the city lacks the money with which to make the repayments. It borrowed money from the bondholders during good financial times, when its real estate-generated tax receipts were greater than today, and when its advisers predicted no foreseeable end to the flow of cash to the city. The expected flow of that cash, the natural inclination of those in government to want to give away other people’s money, and the self-serving manipulations of those in power who rewarded their friends and themselves with rich pensions combined to cause the city to make generous pension commitments to its employees.

It is politically easier to offer generous pension payments to municipal employees in the future than it is to raise their salaries today.

It is politically easier to offer generous pension payments to municipal employees in the future than it is to raise their salaries today. The promise to pay a pension to qualifying retirees upon their entry into the retirement system, just like the promise to repay bondholders the money they loaned, is a legally enforceable contract.

So, confronted with an obligation to repay more than $200 million in loans to bondholders and more than $900 million to the California pension system for its current and former employees, and confounded by a serious reduction in real estate tax revenue, so serious that Stockton cannot afford to pay either the bondholders or the pension system, let alone both, the city that over-borrowed and over-spent and over-promised has sought the protection of a federal bankruptcy court.

Bankruptcy in America is a strange bird. It permits debtors to be relieved of their financial obligations by paying less, often far less, than they owe. It compels creditors to accept less, often far less, than they are due. It is generally an orderly and mechanical process presided over by a neutral judge without a jury. Its goal is to get the creditors something, leave the debtors with something, and let all parties go home in peace and resume their livelihoods.

But it rarely happens to the government. That’s because the government, which has no competition, creates no wealth, doesn’t produce anything of value and needn’t attract clients, has a monopoly on the use of force with which it can extract what it needs to pay for its mistakes in the form of higher taxes. These extractions, of course, are not voluntary transactions as when you buy gas for your car or food for your table. They are mafia-style transactions: Pay us more, or else.

But there must be a limit even to the Stockton taxpayers’ willingness to part with their wealth in the form of taxes, hence the filing for bankruptcy. The Stockton case presents a rare opportunity for a federal judge to interfere with the contractual obligations of a municipal government and actually modify or even nullify them.

It also presents a confluence of a culture in California of high taxes and generous -- often non-contributory -- pensions for even short-term government employees and a federal system that when it faces a shortfall simply goes to its banker -- the Federal Reserve -- and asks it to print more cash. Stockton cannot legally print cash the way the Fed can.

How does this affect the rest of us? Currently, state and local governments owe about $4 trillion in pension benefits that they do not have to current and former employees, and they know they cannot politically acquire it by raising taxes. This affects all 50 states. So the odds are that the states and the similarly situated Stocktons in America will go to the Obama administration and ask for free cash. And the president will no doubt find it for them. That “found” cash will be borrowed from the Federal Reserve and, like all of the federal government’s debts to the Fed, will never be repaid. But countless generations of American taxpayers will make enormous and endless interest payments on it.

Does that sound too apocalyptic for you? Well, consider this: The federal government is still paying interest on the $30 billion it borrowed to wage World War I nearly 100 years ago. So, to the feds, mortgaging your children’s future to save the Stocktons of the country from the consequences of their own profligate ways is a no-brainer.

Should Americans yet unborn pay for all of this? Is this what you elected the government to do? What will it take to keep the government within the confines of the Constitution?

Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written seven books on the U.S. Constitution. His latest is “Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom.”


View the original article here

Thứ Năm, 28 tháng 3, 2013

Does America need its own Schindler's List?

Every age needs courageous individuals to stand up for those who have no voice. Steven Spielberg’s movie, “Schindler’s List,” made the world aware of the heroic efforts of a German businessman, Oskar Schindler, who saved more than 1,200 Jews during the Holocaust. By placing them on his employment list, Schindler was able to prevent them from being sent to the concentration camps.

Another businessman and Swedish ambassador, Raoul Wallenberg, is celebrated worldwide for his efforts to save up to 100,000 Jews in Nazi-occupied Hungary from the Holocaust by issuing protective passports and designating local buildings as Swedish territory in which Jews could be sheltered. At the end of WWII, Ambassador Wallenberg was detained by the Soviet Union and eventually died in a Moscow prison.

Both Oskar Schindler and Raoul Wallenberg were designated as Righteous Among The Nations by Israel for their efforts to save Jews during the Holocaust.

One of Raoul Wallenberg’s closest aides was a 22-year-old Romanian Jew named Martin Preisler. Preisler joined the underground resistance group as a teenager in Hungary.  Working closely with Raoul, he smuggled people, food, clothes and medicine while wearing an SS-uniform.  His efforts saved thousands of fellow Jews from the Holocaust.  Martin Preisler is believed to be the last person to see Wallenberg before his imprisonment by the Soviets.

What would Martin Preisler think?

After WWII, Martin Preisler moved to the United States, married Dr. Sylvia Yvette March, and together they raised five children – Shoshanna, Thomas, Daniel, Rebecca and Nicholas.  Upon his death in 2009 at the age of 86, Preisler and his wife had five grandchildren and one great-grandchild.

Less than a year after his death, Preisler’s family faced a challenge too many American families face.  At the age of 29, the Preislers’ son, Daniel, sustained an anoxic brain injury, and his brain was deprived of oxygen.  Daniel was in perfect physical condition at the time; an athlete all of his life, he never drank or smoked and always ate healthy.  Before his brain injury, he was planning to become a veterinarian.

Dr. Sylvia Preisler was told by the medical experts that Daniel would either die or be in a vegetative state. Due to the state laws, anyone over 21 years of age who has not recovered to full consciousness is ineligible to receive acute rehabilitation treatment. Daniel defied the odds and, without any medical intervention, within a few months began to speak a few words.  However, six months after the injury, Daniel was non-responsive again.

Due to the red tape, Daniel was bounced across the state from one hospital to another to another and, after 15 months, he ended up six hours from the initial hospital.

Throughout this time period, Daniel never received any anti-seizure medications, and not until a full-blown seizure was observed almost a year later did the doctors realize he had been seizing ever since his initial brain injury.

Eventually, Dr. Preisler found a rehab facility in another state willing to admit Daniel.  She transferred him to a nearby nursing home only to be told afterward the rehab facility could not accept him since the transfer took too long. 

Now in another state in another nursing home, things continued to get worse for Martin Preisler’s son.  Daniel was assigned a roommate who yelled and screamed 24 hours a day, and after being exposed to this non-stop overstimulation, Daniel had a massive seizure that sent him back to the hospital. Upon discharge from the hospital with explicit instructions for a quiet environment, the nursing home put him back into the same noisy room and within a week he had another massive tonic-clonic seizure. These seizures set him back again from the progress he had been making since being placed on medications.

Dr. Preisler moved Daniel to yet another nursing home in another state with the hopes of improved care and support. She couldn’t even get the nursing home to provide him with Omega-3 vita-nutrients. The current nursing home couldn’t even maintain a normal temperature in Daniel’s room and as the room overheated, it caused more seizures and Daniel headed back to the hospital.

According to Dr. Preisler, “My son has never received the care he should have and I am so appalled there is no care for the brain injured in this country.  Daniel continues to fight every day and as his mom I will continue to fight for him.”

Dr. Nathan Zasler is one of the foremost experts in the United States in the treatment of individuals with brain injuries who have a disorder of consciousness (whether vegetative state or minimally conscious state).  According to Dr. Zasler, “Daniel’s situation is not unique and there are many examples of such cases in our health care system. There is a lack of funding for specialized programs that understand assessment and treatment of these individuals.”

Brain injury is the leading cause of death and disability for American youth. More than 765,000 enter an emergency department every year with a new brain injury, more than 80,000 are hospitalized and more than 11,000 die each year. It is estimated that there may be as many as 15,000 patients in the United States who are in a persistent vegetative state and more than 100,000 others who are in a minimally conscious state. This is one of the reasons the Sarah Jane Brain Foundation established the National Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury Plan (PABI Plan) whose mission is to develop a seamless, standardized, evidence-based system of care for the millions of families that have a child with a brain injury.

Eight years ago this week, America watched as Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube was disconnected, resulting in her death.  Another Schindler was thrust into the arena to give a voice for the voiceless. Terri’s brother, Bobby Schindler, continues to fight for the lives of the medically vulnerable and disabled as the executive director of the Terri Schiavo Life and Hope Network.

As Jews prepare for Passover, Christians observe Easter Week and Persians celebrate Nowruz, perhaps we can spend a few minutes thinking about Martin Preisler’s son, Daniel, and wonder if America needs its own Schindler’s List to protect our most vulnerable population. 

What would Martin Preisler think?

Patrick B. Donohue, is founder of the The Sarah Jane Brain Foundation. For more, visit: www.TheBrainProject.org.


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 20 tháng 3, 2013

Food-obsessed vanity plates across America

  • APLTINI_HollySherburne_DONE.jpg

    Holly Sherburne/themaineplate.com

  • 1CHERRY_HollySherburne_SLID.jpg

    Holly Sherburne/themaineplate.com

  • BANANA_HollySherburne_DONE.jpg

    Holly Sherburne/themaineplate.com

  • APPLE1-1_HollySherburne_DON.jpg

    Holly Shurburne/themaineplate.com

You know the feeling. You're driving down the highway looking out for the next "Food — Exit" sign, hoping that Starbucks, or Cracker Barrel, or McDonald's, or whatever your guilty (or just favorite) road trip restaurant is will be on it, and that you won't run out of gas before you reach it (why do you always put off getting gas that extra 20 miles?), when all of a sudden a license plate catches your eye. Wait, what does that license plate... does it say, YES, it's "FISH TACO!" Or "OYSTAHS." Or "KEY LIME." That's right, personalized food license plates, the most fleeting of food moments on the road — puns that give you a chuckle and often make you roll your eyes. Then they (or you) speed away and it's back to looking for that DQ (and that gas station).

Across the country, and on the road, there are some pretty epic food license plates: "RD PEPPR," "POPCORN," "PIGOUT,"  "PANCAKE," "NOODLE," "JALPENO," and even a paraphrase of that timeworn cliché attributed to Marie Antoinette, "EAT CAKE." Many are pretty obvious ("M&MS"), others may take you a moment to decipher ("RTBR FLT"), some don't refer so much to food or drink as much as cooking techniques ("FLAMBE"), a handful kind of make you wonder how about how someone could get so passionate something as pedestrian as "CRN SYRP," still more may be questionable in terms of what they're suggesting you do ("EATBUGS," really?). And a few take advantage of the standard or specialized words that appear on some plates to make even longer references (and stranger) sentences: "EAT THE KIDS FIRST."

Food license plates like these have been documented on Flickr by John C. Abell and others, and in posts on blogs here and there, but there may be one person above all others who have excelled at spotting and collecting some of the coolest food license plates in America: Holly Sherburne of The Maine Plate. And yes, it turns out that one American state seems to demonstrate (without checking with the DMV, because seriously, you know what it's like in line, you think it's going to be better on the phone?) a special talent for fun food license plates: Maine.

"I've been photographing vanity license plates for about six years," Sherburne explained. "It began when I published a niche newspaper for dog lovers in Maine. I thought it would fun — and a great visual — to feature dog-related vanity license plates. The more I looked around, the more I saw! Then searching for plates became an obsession and I began taking photos of any I could find."

Sherburne, whose day job is developing the social media strategy for Bowdoin College as its director of social media, now has well more than 3,000 vanity plates (350-plus are dog-related). Her hobby even turned into a book called The Maine Plate, which includes Maine trivia and games that challenge readers to match a plate with the owner's ride or job.

While dog plates are her first passion, Sherburne says that food plates have become her second favorite theme to collect. In fact, it was the first food plate that she saw that led her to expand her collection beyond dogs. "I do remember the first food plate I saw: CLAMDIP," recounted Sherburne. "I love, love, love clam dip and we have a favorite family recipe that I'll share, too. I spotted the license plate in a mall parking lot."

After having published the book, Holly doesn't stop to photograph every vanity plate she sees anymore, but says she will always stop for dog plates, food plates, and those representing a Maine city or town. And quite a few of the plates that Sherburne has collected are indeed from Maine. "Maine is ranked sixth in the nation in terms of percentage of vanity license plates, approximately 10 percent," she claimed.

It's easy enough to snap a photo in a parking lot — easier (and probably safer) say than trying to preserve that fleeting food road memory while driving. But as Sherburne and other (less prolific) food license plate collectors can attest, taking photos of license plates on parked cars comes with its own potential danger: encountering the stranger whose car you're photographing.

"I've met a number of people whose plates I've taken photos of," said Sherburne. "Sometimes they catch me in the act and I have some quick explaining to do. Luckily I don't look threatening, so it always turns into a good conversation about the meaning of their license plates. That's what inspired me to publish The Maine Plate: Maine Vanity License Plates and Their Meanings. Some of the stories are incredible."

These stories may perhaps be one of the most interesting aspects of her project, and the experience of seeing personalized license plates on the road (food or not). "Some were obvious, but others seemed undecipherable — as though they held secrets known only to the vehicle's owner," Sherburne explained in an on-campus interview with Bowdoin. It's almost as though by assembling all these fleeting moments, Sherburne experienced a more complete understanding of an aspect of socializing and identity, and dare it be said (without getting too Kumbaya here) one small part of human interaction that most people haven't experienced when they see plates like these. Sherburne said it recently more succinctly and without the Grateful Dead music playing, "I can’t help but wonder what life event inspired people to turn these phrases into vanity plates."

And in some cases Sherburne has connected with people. Take for example CIDER 1, whose explanation for the inspiration behind the plate Sherburne shared in her book. "I planted 550 apple trees on my farm 25 years ago — after being told by 'experts' that it was impossible to grow apples organically," noted its owner. I kissed each tree before planting it and they have survived and thrived in all conditions. My plate is CIDER 1 because my organic orchard produces the best all-natural unpasteurized cider in Maine. As it happens, 'CIDER' was already taken by someone local, thus the Bureau of Motor Vehicles told me I had to get 'CIDER 1.'"

Then there's the story behind "HOTDOGS." Again, from Sherburne's interview with the person behind that plate: "Wasses Hot Dogs has been selling the very best hot dogs Maine has to offer for nearly 40 years. We are in Rockland and Belfast. Twenty years ago the plate HOTDOG was already taken. After learning that person had retired and sold their business, I contacted them to see if they would give that plate up. The answer was a resounding 'NO.' When the state went to seven letters, I was able to add the 'S,' hence the very appropriate plate for my business vehicle: HOTDOGS."

And "VEGY OIL"? "I have a 1984 Mercedes Benz 300TD (turbo diesel) that I converted over to run on waste vegetable oil (fry-o-later oil) from local restaurants. She gets the same horsepower and miles per gallon that she gets when on diesel, but I get to lower my carbon footprint and cruise for free without supporting foreign oil."

Of course, not everyone's food or drink reference is quite as altruistic or highbrow — not that they have to be. There's nothing wrong for instance in being a little self-referential. Chef Tim Love of Fort Worth's Lonesome Dove (one of The Daily Meal's 101 Best Restaurants in America for 2011) was spotted getting out of a car with the plate, "LDOVE," and in Dallas, chef Kent Rathbun's Porsche has a plate that just reads, "CHEFY."

But you do have to wonder at the motive (and intelligence) of some of the people behind other license plates. Sure, "BUD RIDE," is on the fence, but if it's at least on a car that's blatantly advertorial. And you can kind of get behind "APPLTINI," ""BREWLOT," and even "BEER" in a way, as long as they're not driving after drinking them. But "DRUNK" and "SODRUNK"? Not funny. Someone thought that was a good idea? (Photo courtesy Flickr/gruntzooki)

Still, most of these more than a hundred food- and drink-related license plates collected here are in pretty good taste, inspiring drivers everywhere across the country to maybe place an order for "TATR TOTS," "PIGOUT," or as documented by New York Street Food, settle in for some good "HIBACHI." And if you've collected any of your own, by all means please send it along to be featured too.

See all food-obsessed vanity plates at The Daily Meal

More from The Daily Meal

10 Food Brands That Refuse to Die

The Best Happy Hours Nationwide

101 Best Restaurants in America for 2013

The World's 10 Spiciest Hot Sauces


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 10 tháng 3, 2013

America, North Korea's threats are not coming from a crazy uncle -- they're real

This week, North Korea threatened to nuke Washington. If that does not constitute a hostile signal, then nothing does. And yet, there is a tendency among Washington officials and Asia hands to ignore Pyongyang’s bellicose language.  Problematically, these individuals also downplay North Korea’s capabilities—even as they grow steadily stronger.

Like a crazy uncle, the Kim regime in Pyongyang can be counted on to make truly outrageous statements—often in the wake of truly outrageous conduct. Whether threatening to turn allied cities into a “sea of fire,” labeling the USA as an “imperialist aggressor,” or branding regime critics as “political dwarfs,” Pyongyang’s PR people could make even the ghosts of Nazi propagandists like Joseph Goebbels blush.

With those in allied capitals responsible for defending against North Korea, there is a tendency to tune this out. After all, how can a country with widespread malnourishment, economic output the CIA estimates to be just about 3% of that of its southern neighbor, and a large but obsolete military really purport to take on anyone?

The crazy uncle of Northeast Asia cannot be ignored.

Indeed, after going through the motions of condemning North Korea after one of its brazen acts, officials on both sides of the Pacific tend to forget about Pyongyang until the next incident. This week’s sanctions from the U.N. Security Council, said to “bite hard” by U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice, are nearly identical to previously applied sanctions that proved as vacant as Chinese promises to pressure their client state.

Unfortunately, this tendency to tune out Pyongyang also distracts from what should be an alarming trend: North Korea’s capabilities have been steadily improving.

After Pyongyang’s first nuclear test in 2006 yielded only about one kiloton, U.S. officials refused even to designate North Korea as a nuclear-weapons state.  (By comparison, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was about 16 kilotons; the largest U.S. weapon ever tested was 15,000 kilotons.)  Similarly, the high frequency with which North Korean missile tests ended in catastrophic failure led to chuckles about the threat from a penny-ante dictator with laughable ambitions who seemed to be living up to a parody of himself.

But as with our own nuclear and rocket programs, every failure is a step on the path to success. Scientists approximate North Korea’s February nuclear test to have achieved a yield of seven kilotons.  

In December, its missile test involved a successful multistage separation and put an object into space. While the North Korean military may not yet be able to push a button and launch a nuclear assault on an American city, it is clearly on a trajectory to have that capability one day.

Moreover, even if North Korea never initiates a general war, it is pushing ahead with its most immediate dangerous activity: proliferation. 

Everything North Korea has accomplished in recent months has burnished its catalog of weapons systems and know-how. These are routinely sold to rogue regimes around the world. Syria has been a recent customer; North Korea helped it build a carbon copy of Pyongyang’s plutonium-producing reactor (since destroyed by Israel).  Iran and North Korea cooperate closely as well.  Reports indicate officials from both countries have been present at each other’s nuclear sites.  This is the more likely path to North Korea’s nuclear program destroying an American or allied city.

Thus, the crazy uncle of Northeast Asia cannot be ignored. The Obama administration seems to accept this, but the only idea the Washington foreign policy establishment ever has with North Korea is to talk more to the regime.  The two previous U.S. administrations tried this, and it is clear Pyongyang only engages in talks to extract foreign aid and buy time; never to follow through with promises to disarm or behave.

Washington should remember what won the Cold War.  A combination of opposition within dictatorships and a growing external military posture were the precursors of oppressed people freeing themselves—and ending the threat.  To adapt this to North Korea and the changing threat it poses, the U.S. should move intermediate-range nuclear cruise missiles to the region.  To make deterrence seem more real, we should also have a NATO-style Nuclear Planning Group with Canada, Japan and perhaps other Pacific allies.  This could finally force China to rethink its sponsorship of North Korea, as Beijing’s own security would be negatively impacted for the first time.

Combined with this, the U.S. and other free countries should aid dissenters in North Korea.  They are there, but keep their heads down to survive in the gulag nation.  Funding independent media broadcast from outside North Korea would replicate something that worked well during the Cold War.  It would give an encouraging, peaceful lifeline of information to beleaguered North Koreans.

Freedom for North Koreans—not U.N. pronouncements or endless diplomatic talks—will be the long-awaited harbinger for security in the Pacific.  

Christian Whiton was a State Department senior advisor during the George W. Bush administration.  He is principal at DC International Advisory . His book “Smart Power: Between Diplomacy & War,” will be published by Potomac Books in September.  Follow him on Twitter@ChristianWhiton.


View the original article here

Thứ Năm, 7 tháng 3, 2013

Without entitlement reform, America could experience a permanent sequester

Parks are closing. Government workers are being furloughed. The Department of Defense is issuing warnings about compromised military readiness. The Department of Homeland Security is making similar claims about border security.

Everywhere you look there is talk about the consequences of the recently imposed automatic federal spending cuts. Although most of these are really cuts in the Washington sense of the word—a slower rate of spending increase—sequestration is designed to make deficit reduction choices on auto pilot when federal lawmakers are unable to make them in real life.

The effected programs are being squeezed because mandatory spending on entitlements was largely taken off the table. This resulted in bigger cuts in everything from military spending to transportation infrastructure investments to national parks. But the sad fact is that this is the fiscal path the country was already embarking upon, with sequestration being just one small part of the problem.

Reforming entitlements before it’s too late would keep Americans from living in a permanent state of sequestration.

That’s because as the Baby Boomers retire, entitlement spending and interest payments will gobble up the entire federal budget, leaving little room for anything else. 

Ten years from now, automatically growing programs like Social Security and Medicare will make up 62 percent of annual spending. The Pentagon budget will be just 12 percent. We’re just seven years away from interest payments on the national debt outpacing defense.

According to an estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, interest payments and entitlements will consume the entire federal budget by 2025. That means no funds left over for the programs hit by sequestration without substantial additional borrowing.

Conservatives will rightfully be concerned about putting defense on a starvation diet. But many liberal priorities will be hurt too. 

The group Third Way published a paper titled “Collision Course: Why Democrats Must Back Entitlement Reform,” arguing, “as the cost of entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security has skyrocketed, we’ve spent less and less of our budget educating kids, building roads, and curing disease.

"That means no money for national defense. No money for homeland security. No money to fix the nation’s crumbling bridges and roads. No money for medical research to find a cure for cancer or Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s diseases," Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) concurred in a March 2012 House floor speech.

The nonpartisan fact-checkers at PolitiFact Virginia rated Wolf’s statement as “true.”

While optimists hope that faster economic growth or reduced health care costs could improve this bleak budget outlook, there is also the potential for things to get worse.

If interest rates rise significantly above their current lows, so will the cost of borrowing. The U.S. government could also face further credit downgrades, such as when Standard & Poor’s stripped Uncle Sam of his AAA bond rating in 2011.

Social Security and Medicare are currently projected to face their own cash crunches soon enough. That means that even as they consume more federal tax revenues, these programs may see a decline in quality as the government struggles to pay for the promises it has made to the nation’s seniors.

By one estimate, nearly one-third of doctors nationwide refuse to accept new Medicaid patients because the government health care program for the poor doesn’t pay enough to cover the costs of treating them. This hasn’t just hurt doctors, who received from Medicaid just 58 percent of what private insurance paid in 2008, but also people covered under the program, as their health care options have dwindled.

If Medicare has to cut its payments to doctors as well, there may be a similar decline in quality health care for senior citizens too. “If caring for Medicare patients is too costly, doctors will simply opt out and care for the disabled and those over 65 will become hard to find,” writes the physician Peter Lipson.”

At a time when the country is changing, spending commitments that were made in a very different bygone era are actually handcuffing politicians and limiting the next generation’s choices.

Reforming entitlements before it’s too late—and before current beneficiaries would be impacted—would keep Americans from living in a permanent state of sequestration.

Sometimes, less is more.

W. James Antle III is editor of the Daily Caller News Foundation and author of the forthcoming book "Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped? Regnery Publishing (March 19, 2013)"


View the original article here