Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn before. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn before. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Ba, 14 tháng 5, 2013

BlackBerry CEO unveils new, low-priced Q5 before full house at Jam conference

  • The Blackberry Z10 smartphone

    The new touchscreen BlackBerry Z10 smartphone, which the company hopes will mark a turnaround in its battle against the iPhone and Google's Android.AP Photo/Mark Lennihan

The CEO of BlackBerry-maker Research In Motion will deliver a keynote speech amid speculation that he'll introduce a lower-priced version of the BlackBerry at the company's annual three-day conference in Orlando, Fla.

CEO Thorsten Heins is set to speak Tuesday morning.  RIM unveiled new, versatile BlackBerrys earlier this year after delays allowed Apple and others to dominate the smartphone market.

The BlackBerry, pioneered in 1999, had been the dominant smartphone for on-the-go business people and consumers before the iPhone debuted in 2007 and showed that phones can handle much more than email and calls. RIM faced numerous delays modernizing its operating system. During that time, it had to cut more than 5,000 jobs and saw shareholder wealth decline by more than $70 billion.


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 8 tháng 5, 2013

EPA tries hard to keep nominee Gina McCarthy 'clean' before confirmation hearings

  • 660-Gina-McCarthy-AP.jpg

    FILE -- Feb. 21, 2013: Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator with the Environmental Protection Agency, speaks at a climate workshop sponsored by the Climate Center at Georgetown University in Washington.AP

It's as brazen a defiance of the law as Washington has seen, and the perpetrators are going to get away with it unless things change quickly.

The Environmental Protection Agency has bobbed and weaved, defied court orders, made a mockery of the FOIA process and spent barrels of ink redacting its clearly public records ... all to keep Gina McCarthy clean until she can be confirmed in the Senate to become the agency's next administrator.

The Environment and Public Works Committee will vote this week on McCarthy's nomination. Senators should not act on her nomination until she orders the veil lifted and lets Americans know her record with regard to President Obama's war on coal and efforts by the administration to build outside support for a carbon tax.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute and a others have been after EPA since last fall for emails about its coordination of outside support for President Obama's energy and environment agenda.

There is a culture of secrecy at EPA characterized by widespread use of email aliases and illegal use of private email and messaging accounts to conduct agency business outside of the public's view.

CEI's Christopher Horner has submitted Freedom of Information Act requests for former Administrator Lisa Jackson's emails on coal and carbon. When he found out she also had a fake name account -- Richard Windsor was her handle -- he FOIA-ed those records, too.

When he found out that Jackson and top staffers, including McCarthy, communicated through IMs and texts, he FOIA-ed those. 

EPA has responded with emails that were either irrelevant or comically redacted. Or it has missed deadlines or declined to produce documents despite court orders. Finally, as CEI alleged in a suit this week, it simply refused to acknowledge the requests.

As a result, we've learned little about Jackson's thoughts and deeds and considerably less about McCarthy's. 

Virtually none of the 9,000 emails EPA has turned over -- almost all heavily redacted -- are from McCarthy. Which is odd since the search was for coal and carbon and McCarthy now heads EPA's Air and Radiation Office.

This experience also told us there is a culture of secrecy at EPA characterized by widespread use of email aliases and illegal use of private email and messaging accounts to conduct agency business outside of the public's view-- and that McCarthy is an active enabler of and participant in that culture.

Something must be up. When the Richard Windsor account was revealed, Jackson's senior counsel quit. When it became clear her emails would have to be turned over, she quit. When Region 8 Administrator Jim Martin was caught using private email for public business, he quit.

That's a lot of quitting and a lot of obfuscating, and the Senate should demand answers before it moves on McCarthy.

Brian McNicoll is Senior Director of Communications for the Competitive Enterprise Institute.


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 7 tháng 5, 2013

Before Babel? Ancient mother tongue reconstructed

  • tower-of-babel

    The idea of a universal human language goes back at least to the Bible, in which humanity spoke a common tongue, but were punished with mutual unintelligibility after trying to build the Tower of Babel all the way to heaven. Now scientists havePieter Brueghel the Elder (1526/1530–1569)

The ancestors of people from across Europe and Asia may have spoken a common language about 15,000 years ago, new research suggests.

Now, researchers have reconstructed words, such as "mother," "to pull" and "man," which would have been spoken by ancient hunter-gatherers, possibly in an area such as the Caucuses or the modern-day country of Georgia. The word list, detailed today (May 6) in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, could help researchers retrace the history of ancient migrations and contacts between prehistoric cultures.

"We can trace echoes of language back 15,000 years to a time that corresponds to about the end of the last ice age," said study co-author Mark Pagel, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Reading in the United Kingdom.

Tower of Babel

The idea of a universal human language goes back at least to the Bible, in which humanity spoke a common tongue, but were punished with mutual unintelligibility after trying to build the Tower of Babel all the way to heaven. [Image Gallery: Ancient Middle-Eastern Texts]

But not all linguists believe in a single common origin of language, and trying to reconstruct that language seemed impossible. Most researchers thought they could only trace a language's roots back 3,000 to 4,000 years. (Even so, researchers recently said they had traced the roots of a common mother tongue to many Eurasian languages back 8,000 to 9,500 years to Anatolia, a southwestern Asian peninsula that is now part of Turkey.)

Pagel, however, wondered whether language evolution proceeds much like biological evolution. If so, the most critical words, such as the frequently used words that define our social relationships, would change much more slowly.

To find out if he could uncover those ancient words, Pagel and his colleagues in a previous study tracked how quickly words changed in modern languages. They identified the most stable words. They also mapped out how different modern languages were related.

They then reconstructed ancient words based on the frequency at which certain sounds tend to change in different languages for instance, p's and f's often change over time in many languages, as in the change from "pater" in Latin to the more recent term "father" in English.

The researchers could predict what 23 words, including "I," "ye," "mother," "male," "fire," "hand" and "to hear" might sound like in an ancestral language dating to 15,000 years ago.

In other words, if modern-day humans could somehow encounter their Stone Age ancestors, they could say one or two very simple statements and make themselves understood, Pagel said.

Limitations of tracing language

Unfortunately, this language technique may have reached its limits in terms of how far back in history it can go.

"It's going to be very difficult to go much beyond that, even these slowly evolving words are starting to run out of steam," Pagel told LiveScience.

The study raises the possibility that researchers could combine linguistic data with archaeology and anthropology "to tell the story of human prehistory," for instance by recreating ancient migrations and contacts between people, said William Croft, a comparative linguist at the University of New Mexico, who was not involved in the study.

"That has been held back because most linguists say you can only go so far back in time," Croft said. "So this is an intriguing suggestion that you can go further back in time."

Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter @tiaghose.FollowLiveScience @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article onLiveScience.com.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 3 tháng 5, 2013

On National Day of Prayer, America needs prayer like never before

When Shirley Dobson, the wife of James Dobson, asked me to be the Honorary Chairman of the National Day of Prayer Task Force, I wondered at first if she was talking to the right person. I was so humbled, and of course I agreed.

Why? Because America needs prayer like never before.

In fact, I think the answers to our deepest needs as a nation are spiritual, not political.

We need divine intervention, and if we don’t receive it, we are in for some very dark days indeed. The United States needs another spiritual awakening or, as it is often called, a revival.

Despite the fact that we, as a nation, have largely forgotten God, the good news is: God has not forgotten us.

What is a revival? Revival means to restore something to its original condition.

Perhaps we cannot say that America is a completely Christian country, as it would seem everyone in it would need to believe in Jesus Christ to make that qualification. However, there is no denying that this country has a Judeo-Christian foundation.

But we have gotten too far from that. In the words of President Abraham Lincoln, “We have forgotten God.” We see trouble in our culture today. We see the breakdown of the family, crippling addictions, and random acts of horrific violence.

We have done our best to remove God’s Word and His counsel from our courtrooms, classrooms, and culture. Despite the fact that we, as a nation, have largely forgotten God, the good news is: God has not forgotten us. He still can bless and redeem our country.

One of the reasons I know that is because He redeemed me. 

I never knew my father. My mother was an alcoholic who married and divorced seven times. I smoked pot, dropped acid, and drank my problems away. But God got hold of me and my life was turned around.

And if there’s redemption for me and my situation, there is redemption for everyone and everything.

I think a lot of the problems in America started back in the 1960s, when I was a kid. That experimentation of the ‘60s has turned into an epidemic in the 21st century. 

Sociologist Robert Nesbet wrote, “The ideologies which gained entry into the academy in the ‘60s claim that fundamental intellectual principles of Western culture were illegitimate and must be overthrown. And with that we destroyed terms like truth, good, and evil.”

People laugh at the Christian worldview today. Up is down. Right is wrong. Wrong is right. So in our schools, evolution is taught as fact even though it is disputed in the scientific community. And yet they will not even consider teaching the biblical truth of creationism.

We basically teach our children that they crawled out of the ooze. They are highly evolved animals. Thus there is no God, there is no afterlife, and there is no final judgment. And then we scratch our heads and wonder what is happening when a kid gets a gun and walks onto a campus and starts shooting people.

And the pundits and the experts opine away and everyone asks why. And my question is, “Well, why not?” If there is no right and wrong, if there is no good and evil, if there is no God, why would we expect people to live morally?

To quote Lincoln again, “We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us and we have vainly imagined in the deceitfulness of our heart that all of these blessings that we see in our country were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own.”

That’s why the only hope is not merely a return to conservative values; it is a return to the biblical truth that we find only in the pages of Scripture.

If we want to see our nation turn back to righteousness, then we must pray. Please join me in doing that on May 2, the National Day of Prayer.

Pastor Greg Laurie is the Honorary Chairman of the National Day of Prayer Task Force and the founder of the Harvest Crusades. Harvest America 2013 will be simulcast live from Philadelphia on Sept. 28–29.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 28 tháng 4, 2013

Bombing shifts Mass. Senate race before primaries Tuesday

Even before the explosions, polling suggested that Massachusetts voters weren't excited about the looming special election to replace former U.S. Sen. John Kerry.

But in the days after bombs ripped through the Boston Marathon's crowded streets, politics were all but forgotten as authorities launched an unprecedented manhunt and a region grappled with terror. It didn't matter that competitive primary contests were 15 days away; everything was put on hold.

"There are things that are more important than campaigning and that horrific event was clearly one of them," said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey, who is competing against U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch for the Democratic nomination to replace Kerry, now the secretary of state.

After suspending political activities for roughly a week, the candidates have been forced to walk a delicate balance as they engage voters ahead of Tuesday's Republican and Democratic primaries. They have largely avoided the site of the attack out of sensitivity for victims, but some have tweaked campaign advertising to address the bombing, highlighted their national security credentials and tried to use the sudden focus on terrorism to shift the direction of the race.

The general election, featuring the primary winners, is scheduled for June 25.

"It completely changed the landscape," Lynch aide Scott Ferson said of the bombing.

Indeed, a campaign once dominated by debates about the environment, health care and women's rights has become more focused on enemy combatants, Miranda rights and counterterrorism agencies. Some candidates welcomed the shift.

On the Democratic side, Lynch has seized on national security in recent days to attack Markey, thought to be the front-runner. One of the most memorable moments in last week's Democratic debate, just a week after the bombing, focused on support for federal security efforts

"Unlike my colleague Mr. Markey, I've actually voted for the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bills," Lynch charged.

Markey responded: "He's taking a page right out of the Karl Rove swift boat playbook, and it's very sad, especially just one week after what just happened in Boston, Cambridge and Watertown."

Through Tuesday's primary election, Markey outspent Lynch on television advertising $1.7 million to $1.2 million, according to advertising figures obtained by The Associated Press. But only Lynch focused on the bombings in a television ad that blanketed the state last week, while Markey focused on traditional Democratic priorities such as women's reproductive rights.

"We hold in our hearts those we lost, but we will get through this together and work toward a brighter day," Lynch says in the campaign ad.

But Lynch was forced to distance himself last week from a so-called robo-call made on his behalf by the leader of an ironworkers' union, who mentions the bombings while encouraging voters to support someone who "understands the day-to-day problems facing working families." It was an awkward moment for the Lynch campaign, which called on the group to stop the calls.

But it's unclear how many people were paying attention.

"The bombings basically sucked all the air out of the room," said Steve Koczela, president of MassINC Polling Group, which found last month that more than 40 percent of likely Democratic voters and nearly 50 percent of likely Republican voters hadn't settled on a candidate.

"It just doesn't seem like -- even as of the last poll -- people were really paying attention to who was running," Koczela continued. "There's room for any of the candidates to make a move."

On the Republican side in particular, the recent violence shifted the contours of the contest.

GOP candidate Gabriel Gomez, a former Navy SEAL, finished running the marathon minutes before the bombs exploded along the finish line, killing three and injuring more than 200.

Like other candidates, Gomez immediately pulled television ads off the air and suspended campaign activities. He said he was focused on being respectful as he eased back into campaigning the following weekend.

"We can't let the terrorists win and completely suspend what is fundamental right in the United States," Gomez said.

He charged that President Barack Obama's administration should have designated 19-year-old suspect Dzhohkar Tsarnaev an "enemy combatant" and tried him outside the traditional criminal justice system.

Another GOP candidate, Mike Sullivan, says the federal government should have denied Tsarnaev his Miranda rights, tried him as an enemy combatant and revoked his U.S. citizenship.

"Our first concern must always be preventing future terrorist acts against our people," said Sullivan, a former U.S. attorney whose campaign has been reminding people that he previously led the prosecution of shoe bomber Richard Reid.

Republican candidate Dan Winslow, a former judge and chief legal counsel under former Gov. Mitt Romney, said the entire GOP field has experience with national security.

"We've got a Navy SEAL, a former prosecutor and a former judge all in the field for Republicans," Winslow said. "I think we all have our own credentials. The key is, Who's got the better ideas? Who's got the better electability in June?"

The key may also be which candidate can convince his supporters to get to the polls as the bombing continues to dominate attention in Massachusetts. State officials were already predicting a low turnout, likely less than 20 percent of eligible voters, even before the attack.

Wendy Becker, 45, of Newton, was among the thousands who visited the bomb site in Copley Square late last week. A registered voter, she said she didn't know the primaries were happening so soon.

"I didn't even know it was Tuesday and haven't cared," she said, noting that her little brother and brother-in-law ran in the marathon. She's been glued to the television coverage of the aftermath even since.


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 22 tháng 3, 2013

Stop ObamaCare's massive 'HIT' tax before it puts more Americans out of work

President Obama’s health care law took effect three years ago. Since then, Americans have watched their health insurance premiums continue to rise. Now, they’re about to get hit again unless Congress repeals one of ObamaCare’s most expensive tax increases.

The president’s health care law included more than $1 trillion worth of tax hikes. One of those is the health insurance tax, also referred to as the "HIT."

Washington will start charging the tax next January – almost four years after the bill became law. This new tax is another example of how President Obama and Democrats in Congress designed for the painful parts of the law to kick in years later.   

Over the next 10 years, this tax will amount to $102 billion.

While insurance companies are responsible for paying the tax, it’s clear that they will pass most of the expense on to their customers.

This massive health insurance tax, like the rest of the health care law, is completely flawed. For example, the cost of the tax stays the same – regardless of how many companies and people have to pay it. While larger businesses may be able to avoid the tax by self-insuring, the remaining customers will have to pay more each. The tax will fall most heavily on those least able to afford it: small businesses and self-employed people.

Faced with higher health insurance costs, many businesses will push more of the costs to their employees. According to one estimate, families who get insurance through a small employer will see their take-home pay cut by about $5,000 over the next decade because of the new health insurance tax.

Sharing the costs won’t be enough for many businesses. They will be faced with a difficult choice: they can either trim staff or avoid hiring. The National Federation of Independent Business estimates the tax will force the private sector to cut between 146,000 and 262,000 jobs by 2022.

Twenty-three million Americans are either out of work today or working less than they’d like. The last thing we need is a tax that forces more layoffs. The Federal Reserve understands, even if the White House does not. The Fed’s latest "Beige Book" cited the president’s health care law as one reason for persistently high unemployment.

I hear the same when I talk with people back home in Wyoming, and when I travel around the country. Small business owners tell me they want to grow, expand and succeed. They also tell me about the ways Washington is holding them back. The president’s health care law is at the top of their list.

How can they grow their businesses when they don’t know how the law’s 20,000 pages of new red tape will affect them? How can they hire more workers when they can’t predict how much they will have to pay for the mandated insurance and all the new taxes?

The president’s health care law was a bad idea that will only get worse in the years ahead. As the law is implemented, Americans will understand how it makes it harder for them to get the care they need, from a doctor they choose, at a lower cost.

The best solution is to repeal this law entirely and start over with real reforms so that America’s health care system will continue to be the best in the world.

Until that happens, we can fight for legislation that improves the lives of the American people. This week, Senator Orrin Hatch and I introduced the Jobs and Premium Protection Act to repeal this health insurance tax before it can do more damage.

Washington needs to focus on helping small businesses grow, not burdening them with new taxes. It’s time to eliminate this bad policy that will make it harder for people to afford health insurance and cost thousands of Americans their jobs.

Republican John Barrasso represents Wyoming in the U.S. Senate. He serves in the Senate as a member of both the Energy and Environment Committees. Follow him on Twitter@Sen.JohnBarrasso.


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 15 tháng 3, 2013

Video shows Jodi Arias singing, performing headstand minutes before murder charge

Minutes before Jodi Arias was charged with the brutal murder of her boyfriend, she was caught on video singing, laughing, asking about her makeup and doing a 20-second headstand.  

The June 15, 2008, video catches her just 15 minutes after sobbing through a four-hour police interrogation. Her attitude dramatically changes.

Once the prosecutor leaves the room Arias is seen talking to herself, laughing and playing with a garbage can. She then does a headstand against the wall.

Arias, who testified for 18 days over nearly six weeks, has cited self defense, masked intruders and memory loss in justifying the 2008 killing of her boyfriend, Travis Alexander.

A psychologist testified Thursday that jurors should see Arias' unusual behavior in context.

“A large percentage of individuals who are in such settings do not remember or have cloudy or foggy memories of what has transpired,” Richard Samuels testified. “We are more concerned with survival.”

Samuels said he specializes in “sexually violent perpetrator evaluations, psychosexual risk assessments, sexual harassment and gender discrimination matters.”

He said he has met with Arias a dozen times and eventually diagnosed her with post-traumatic stress disorder.

“There are many people that never remember the actual events,” Samuels said.

In the 2008 video, Arias is heard singing a song with the lyrics, “it might change my memory.”

Arias initially told authorities she had nothing to do with the murder, but her defense now argues the killing was in self defense. During testimony, Arias has described an abusive childhood, cheating boyfriends, dead-end jobs and a shocking sexual relationship with Alexander, and she contends he had grown physically abusive in the months leading up to his death, once even choking her into unconsciousness.

Samuels testified that Arias lied initially about her involvement because she was in denial “where a person cannot deal with the fact that something they did is so opposite from everything else in their life.”

Alexander suffered nearly 30 knife wounds, was shot in the head and had his throat slit before prosecutors say Arias dragged his body into the shower.

Arias testified she remembered Alexander attacking her and that she ran into his closet, retrieved a gun he kept on a shelf and fired in self-defense. She has testified that she has no memory of the stabbings.

Arias’ grandparents had reported a .25-caliber handgun stolen from their Northern California home about a week before the murder – the same caliber used to shoot him – but Arias said she didn’t take it. Authorities think she took it with her.

Arias has acknowledged trying to clean the murder scene, dumping the gun in the desert and leaving Alexander a voicemail on his cellphone hours later in an attempt to avoid suspicion. She said she was scared to tell the truth.

No witnesses have been able to confirm Arias allegations about Alexander’s violence, gun ownership and sexual desire for young boys.

She has acknowledged lying repeatedly but insists to jurors that she is telling the truth now.

The trial is set to resume Monday. She could get the death penalty if convicted.

“If I am convicted, that’s because of my own bad choices,” Arias said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


View the original article here