Chủ Nhật, 28 tháng 4, 2013

The six coolest car names ever

  • aar-cuda-660.jpg

Shakespeare famously asked, “What’s in a name?”  In the automotive world, frankly, a hell of a lot. It’s difficult to imagine a Corvette called anything else. Yet, it’s not on our list of cool names because prior to its application to America’s sports car, a corvette was a not-quite-a-destroyer type of small anti-submarine boat. The name only became cool after the Corvette became a success (which didn’t exactly happen overnight). Our favorite cool car names are the ones that are inherently cool. Like these six:

  1. Mercury Marauder: The name conjures up bands of roving barbarians. In addition to providing basic transportation, who wouldn’t want a car that’s also proficient at looting and pillaging?
  2. Ferrari 500 Superfast: Even in the early 1960s, using this name took cojones —something that Enzo Ferrari never lacked. It’s almost over-the-top comical, not unlike Wile E. Coyote’s business card, which listed his occupation as “Super Genius.” One can only imagine the response of today’s product liability lawyers to this one.
  3. Ford Mustang: While the association with the car doesn’t hurt, the name Mustang was cool long before the car debuted in April 1964. Whether it’s the war-winning fighter plane the P-51 Mustang or the wild horse (the car was actually named for the former), it’s just plain cool. 

    [Related Article: Misleading Car Names]

  4. Shelby Cobra: As venomous snakes go, Cobras are wicked cool. The whole hood thing, their exotic origins and their highly concentrated venom make your ordinary rattlers and water moccasins seem, well, ordinary. It makes for one of the all-time great hood badges, too.
  5. Plymouth Barracuda: As fish go, after the shark, the barracuda is arguably the most badass. Beautifully streamlined, highly aggressive and possessing a mouthful of piranha-like teeth, it’s possibly one of the most evocative names for a performance car ever. And while Mopar fans worship the way later cars were simply called the ’Cuda, we remain fans of the full name.
  6. Aston Martin Vanquish: Vanquish is generally defined as follows: To utterly defeat; soundly thrash or beat; to overpower, subjugate or subdue. Enough said.

Click here for more classic car stories from Hagerty, or here to sign up for our Classic Car Newsletter


View the original article here

Vintage planters glam up the garden

  • iStock_SmallClayPlanters660.jpg

Flower pots, whether plain or custom painted, are so nice to have out on the porch, or in the yard. And there are so many kinds of containers to enjoy, from thrifted finds to high-end stone. One thing is certain: flower pots can add to, or detract from, the style of your house. Make sure that your choice of flower pots matches the stye of your house. Modern house equals modern flower pots. French Country house equals vintage flower pots. Right? Right.

Fortunately, blogger Courtney from French Country Cottage (a great DIY painter near San Francisco) curated a collection of vintage flower pots that she loves. Many of the pots that she chose are not even pots at all. Instead, they are cleverly used random vintage objects that have a whole lot of style and a whole lot of personality. Are you ready to check out some of Courtney's vintage picks? OK, let's roll! (Or, head over to Hometalk.com to see Courtney's whole Vintage Planters clipboard.)

The junk garden wheelbarrow: What do you get when you combine a big old vintage wheelbarrow with two big galvanized steel tubs full of pretty flowers? You get something special. All you need is some Thomson's water seal to preserve the chippy finish of an old-fashioned wheelbarrow. If you love this project and can't find a vintage wheelbarrow, feel free to faux finish a new one with a chippy paint job.

The vintage bicycle planter: This is Courtney's own project, and it is a lovely one. Affix two vintage baskets to an old bicycle, one in front and one in back. The bike can be rusty and in disrepair, since you're only using it for decoration. Plant flowers in the baskets. Lean the bike against a tree or something to make it look really spontaneous.

The vintage kettle garden: One of my favorite Canadians generated this idea, Donna from Funky Junk Interiors. This fantastic DIY remodeler turned her vintage kettle collection into funky planters by, um, planting herbs in them. The visual impact of a collection of planters is stronger than a single planter, but a single kettle could look great grouped with other vintage planters.

What's the weirdest thing you have used as a planter? Mine is an old toilet bowl. One, two, three, comments, GO!

Chaya Kurtz writes for Networx.com.

Click to view original post.


View the original article here

NBA legend Michael Jordan marries model Yvette Prieto in Florida

  • jordan_2010.jpg

    March 18, 2010: Charlotte Bobcats majority owner Michael Jordan speaks during a news conference in Charlotte, N.C.Reuters

NBA legend Michael Jordan married Cuban-American model Yvette Prieto at a Florida church Saturday – the same one where mogul Donald Trump held his nuptials in 2005.

 Jordan, 50, and Prieto, 35, were reportedly married before approximately 500 guests, including ex-New York Knick Patrick Ewing and one-time teammate Scottie Pippen, at the Bethesda-by-the-Sea Episcopal Church in Palm Beach.

 The Miami Herald reports that a black tuxedo-clad Jordan, who is now majority owner of the Charlotte Bobcats, shot a thumbs-up upon arrival to the between 20 and 30 starry-eyed fans who gathered for the event.

 Jordan has three children with his ex-wife, Juanita Vanoy, to whom he was married in 1989. The hoops legend and Vanoy filed for divorce in 2002, but reconciled before their final separation in 2006.

Saturday’s ceremony was reportedly followed by a massive reception at Jordan’s palatial, 37,000-square-foot house in Jupiter.  The Herald reports that the gala affair was held under three enormous tents that spanned the length of two football fields.

 “I calculated a total under-roof space of about 600 feet long by 150 feet wide,” an unidentified worker told The Herald. “I’ve never seen anything like it. I’ve been working weddings for a while. It looks like he’s having about 2,000 people over.”

People Magazine reports that Prieto met Jordan at a Miami nightclub in 2008, and the couple have been dating since then.


View the original article here

3 Ways to make your guest room like a fine inn

  • iStock_XSmall_Bedroom660.jpg

The words "house guest" usually conjure up feelings of privacy being invaded, coffee cups being left on the table, and the bathroom being unavailable when you need it most. That's why they make inns, and bed and breakfasts, and hotels.

In a weird turn of events that can only be described as fallout from the DIY blogosphere and an impulse to live up to the standards of Martha Stewart Living, which have been made "affordable" by the DIY blogosphere. Now not only can your guest room look nice, it can look like a room in a fine inn, and you should totally be able to redecorate it for under $200. Just kidding. You might need to spend more if you don't already have a stash of amazing thrift store finds and special paints at the ready.

Truly, the reason to upgrade your guest room is to make your own life easier. When your guest room is well equipped (even better if you have a guest bathroom to offer), your guest will be less reliant on you, and more reliant on all of the wonderful amenities that are already in the room and in the guest bathroom. Also, having a sweet guest bedroom is a good boost to the ego. Just saying.

Neutral guest bedroom: LiveLoveDIY shows us all how to use neutral colors to make a guest bedroom look really luxe. Neutrals are both a starting point and an entity unto themselves. A chandelier, crisp white bedding, a silver-framed mirror, and matching white end tables with matching silver lamps make off white walls look unbelievably fresh (painting contractor for the walls not included). Does it look like it cost an arm and and a leg? The mirror? Spray painted. The bedding, curtains, and pillows? TJMaxx, Target, and Marshall's. One thing that solid, neutral-colored walls and textiles allow you to do is mix and match without having to be too, too picky.

*Guest room tip: provide a luggage rack at the end of the bed for your guests to rest their luggage on.

Yellow walls and antique plates: This is the quintessential old fashioned inn look, and you can follow the lead of The 2 Seasons blog. A four poster bed set against old fashioned yellow walls sets an example for guest rooms. Classic, contrasting pillow designs really make the room look special.

*Guest room tip: Use a desk or narrow table along a wall as an amenities table. Place stacks of clean towels, a coffee pot, and some disposable cups there. Place a list of important information, like your wireless network code and the number for local taxi service, on the amenities table.

The seven-layer approach to guest bedding: Authentic Living Interiors, a designer who works with Atlanta remodeling contractors, gives a step-by-step tutorial on how to make a hotel-worthy bed. When I say "hotel" here, I mean top of the line luxury. You can do it at home. All you need to do is just click through to Hometalk to see her tutorial.

*Guest room tip: Leave not one, but two, sets of keys for your guest, so that she can never lock herself out.

Chaya Kurtz writes for Networx.com.

Click to view original post.


View the original article here

Fatal stabbing of girl, 8, prompts manhunt in California

The Calaveras County Sheriff's office says early Sunday that authorities are still searching for an intruder who killed a 9-year-old girl at her house.

The Sheriff's office says that the man was considered armed and dangerous, and authorities are warning residents in the Northern California town of Valley Springs to lock their doors.

The office on Saturday declined to release details on the slaying.

KCRA-TV says the victim's 12-year-old brother encountered an intruder in his home and saw the man run away. The boy went to check on his sister and found she had been stabbed.

The girl was later pronounced dead at a hospital.

Valley Springs is about 60 miles from Sacramento.


View the original article here

More top Republicans: Bomb plot perhaps involved others, FBI to investigate worldwide

The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee said Sunday he thinks the Boston Marathon bombing suspects were trained in carrying out the attack.

Chairman Rep. Michael McCaul told “Fox News Sunday” he thinks suspects Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev had help, considering the device’s level of sophistication and the type of device -- a shrapnel-packed, pressure-cooker bomb.

“That leads me to believe there was a trainer,” the Texas Republican said.

Homemade bombs built from pressure cookers have been a frequent weapon of militants in Afghanistan, India and Pakistan. Al Qaeda's branch in Yemen once published an online manual on how to make one.

McCaul also said he thinks the suspects' mother, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, played "a very strong role" in her Muslim sons' radicalization process and that if she were to return to the United States from Russia, she'd be held for questioning.

The suspects are ethnic Chechens who emigrated from southern Russia to the Boston area over the past 11 years.

They purportedly dropped, then detonated two bombs near the finish line of the race, killing three and injuring more than 260 others.

The 26-year-old Tamerlan was killed several days after the attack in a shootout with police. The 19-year-old Dzhokhar was captured in the manhunt and is now at a medical detention center.

McCaul also was critical of the Obama administration, saying just days after the deadly April 15 bombings there was no foreign terrorist connection to the suspects.

“They just got captured,” McCaul said. “Yet the narrative being played out by the administration is there is no connection. … It’s a rush to judgment.”

He said the FBI just got a hold of a computer used by at least one of the suspects and that agents have just arrived in Russia and the surrounding region.

“It’s the right of the American people to see where the investigation goes,” McCaul said.

In addition, the Associated Press reported that Russian authorities secretly recorded a telephone conversation in 2011 in which one of the suspects vaguely discussed jihad with his mother, according to U.S. officials speaking Saturday, days after the U.S. government finally received details about the call.

In another conversation, the mother of now-dead bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev was recorded talking to someone in southern Russia who is under FBI investigation in an unrelated case, officials said.

The conversations are significant because, had they been revealed earlier, they might have been enough evidence for the FBI to initiate a more thorough investigation of the Tsarnaev family.

As it was, Russian authorities told the FBI only that they had concerns that Tamerlan and his mother were religious extremists. With no additional information, the FBI conducted a limited inquiry and closed the case in June 2011.

Meanwhile, Rep. Jason Chaffetz on Friday said he's not convinced the two brothers suspected in the Boston Marathon bombings acted alone and suggested they may be part of a broader plot.

The Utah Republican, a member of the Homeland Security Committee, urged investigators to look into whether the suspects were part of a larger terror network.

"I don't think it's necessarily just two kids who watched some YouTube videos and went awry and decided to do this mayhem," Chaffetz said on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" program. "No, I worry that they were radicalized in a way that others may have also been radicalized."

Chaffetz described the suspects -- Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who is dead, and his brother -- as "punks."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists

  • Abrams_tank.jpg

    FILE: April 23, 2012: An Abrams battle tank during a tour of the Joint Systems Manufacturing Center, Lima Army Tank Plant, in Lima, Ohio.REUTERS

Built to dominate the enemy in combat, the Army's hulking Abrams tank is proving equally hard to beat in a budget battle.

Lawmakers from both parties have devoted nearly half a billion dollars in taxpayer money over the past two years to build improved versions of the 70-ton Abrams

But senior Army officials have said repeatedly, "No thanks."

It's the inverse of the federal budget world these days, in which automatic spending cuts are leaving sought-after pet programs struggling or unpaid altogether. Republicans and Democrats for years have fought so bitterly that lawmaking in Washington ground to a near-halt.

Yet in the case of the Abrams tank, there's a bipartisan push to spend an extra $436 million on a weapon the experts explicitly say is not needed.

"If we had our choice, we would use that money in a different way," Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army's chief of staff, told The Associated Press this past week.

Why are the tank dollars still flowing? Politics.

Keeping the Abrams production line rolling protects businesses and good paying jobs in congressional districts where the tank's many suppliers are located.

If there's a home of the Abrams, it's politically important Ohio. The nation's only tank plant is in Lima. So it's no coincidence that the champions for more tanks are Rep. Jim Jordan and Sen. Rob Portman, two of Capitol's Hill most prominent deficit hawks, as well as Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. They said their support is rooted in protecting national security, not in pork-barrel politics.

"The one area where we are supposed to spend taxpayer money is in defense of the country," said Jordan, whose district in the northwest part of the state includes the tank plant.

The Abrams dilemma underscores the challenge that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel faces as he seeks to purge programs that the military considers unnecessary or too expensive in order to ensure there's enough money for essential operations, training and equipment.

Hagel, a former Republican senator from Nebraska, faces a daunting task in persuading members of Congress to eliminate or scale back projects favored by constituents.

Federal budgets are always peppered with money for pet projects. What sets the Abrams example apart is the certainty of the Army's position.

Sean Kennedy, director of research for the nonpartisan Citizens Against Government Waste, said Congress should listen when one of the military services says no to more equipment.

"When an institution as risk averse as the Defense Department says they have enough tanks, we can probably believe them," Kennedy said.

Congressional backers of the Abrams upgrades view the vast network of companies, many of them small businesses, that manufacture the tanks' materials and parts as a critical asset that has to be preserved. The money, they say, is a modest investment that will keep important tooling and manufacturing skills from being lost if the Abrams line were to be shut down.

The Lima plant is a study in how federal dollars affect local communities, which in turn hold tight to the federal dollars. The facility is owned by the federal government but operated by the land systems division of General Dynamics, a major defense contractor that spent close to $11 million last year on lobbying, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

The plant is Lima's fifth-largest employer with close to 700 employees, down from about 1,100 just a few years ago, according to Mayor David Berger. But the facility is still crucial to the local economy. "All of those jobs and their spending activity in the community and the company's spending probably have about a $100 million impact annually," Berger said.

Jordan, a House conservative leader who has pushed for deep reductions in federal spending, supported the automatic cuts known as the sequester that require $42 billion to be shaved from the Pentagon's budget by the end of September. The military also has to absorb a $487 billion reduction in defense spending over the next 10 years, as required by the Budget Control Act passed in 2011.

Still, said Jordan, it would be a big mistake to stop producing tanks.

"Look, (the plant) is in the 4th Congressional District and my job is to represent the 4th Congressional District, so I understand that," he said. "But the fact remains, if it was not in the best interests of the national defense for the United States of America, then you would not see me supporting it like we do."

The tanks that Congress is requiring the Army to buy aren't brand new. Earlier models are being outfitted with a sophisticated suite of electronics that gives the vehicles better microprocessors, color flat panel displays, a more capable communications system, and other improvements. The upgraded tanks cost about $7.5 million each, according to the Army.

Out of a fleet of nearly 2,400 tanks, roughly two-thirds are the improved versions, which the Army refers to with a moniker that befits their heft: the M1A2SEPv2, and service officials said they have plenty of them. "The Army is on record saying we do not require any additional M1A2s," Davis Welch, deputy director of the Army budget office, said this month.

The tank fleet, on average, is less than 3 years old. The Abrams is named after Gen. Creighton Abrams, one of the top tank commanders during World War II and a former Army chief of staff.

The Army's plan was to stop buying tanks until 2017, when production of a newly designed Abrams would begin. Orders for Abrams tanks from U.S. allies help fill the gap created by the loss of tanks for the Army, according to service officials, but congressional proponents of the program feared there would not be enough international business to keep the Abrams line going.

This pause in tank production for the U.S. would allow the Army to spend its money on research and development work for the new and improved model, said Ashley Givens, a spokeswoman for the Army's Ground Combat Systems office.

The first editions of the Abrams tank were fielded in the early 1980s. Over the decades, the Abrams supply chain has become embedded in communities across the country.

General Dynamics estimated in 2011 that there were more than 560 subcontractors throughout the country involved in the Abrams program and that they employed as many as 18,000 people. More than 40 of the companies are in Pennsylvania, according to Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa., also a staunch backer of continued tank production.

A letter signed by 173 Democratic and Republican members of the House last year and sent to then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta demonstrated the depth of bipartisan support for the Abrams program on Capitol Hill. They chided the Obama administration for neglecting the industrial base and proposing to terminate tank production in the United States for the first time since World War II.

Portman, who served as President George W. Bush's budget director before being elected to the Senate, said allowing the line to wither and close would create a financial mess.

"People can't sit around for three years on unemployment insurance and wait for the government to come back," Portman said. "That supply chain is going to be much more costly and much more inefficient to create if you mothball the plant."

Pete Keating, a General Dynamics spokesman, said the money from Congress is allowing for a stable base of production for the Army, which receives about four tanks a month. With the line open, Lima also can fill international orders, bringing more work to Lima and preserving American jobs, he said.

Current foreign customers are Saudi Arabia, which is getting about five tanks a month, and Egypt, which is getting four. Each country pays all of their own costs. That's a "success story during a period of economic pain," Keating said.

Still, far fewer tanks are coming out of the Lima plant than in years past. The drop-off has affected companies such as Verhoff Machine and Welding in Continental, Ohio, which makes seats and other parts for the Abrams. Ed Verhoff, the company's president, said his sales have dropped from $20 million to $7 million over the past two years. He's also had to lay off about 25 skilled employees and he expects to be issuing more pink slips in the future.

"When we start to lose this base of people, what are we going to do? Buy our tanks from China?" Verhoff said.

Steven Grundman, a defense expert at the Atlantic Council in Washington, said the difficulty of reviving defense industrial capabilities tends to be overstated.

"From the fairly insular world in which the defense industry operates, these capabilities seem to be unique and in many cases extraordinarily high art," said Grundman, a former deputy undersecretary of defense for industrial affairs and installations during the Clinton administration. "But in the greater scope of the economy, they tend not to be."


View the original article here

Eighteen financial superstars on how to thrive in Obama's bad economy

It has now become clear that President Obama’s economic policies will continue to kill jobs, damage the private sector, and destroy the economy in the next four years. After all, they are the same policies that have led to the collapse of the European Union's economy which happening now before our very eyes.

But there is good news amidst this terrible economic crisis. Did you know that there were more self-made millionaires created during the Great Depression than in any other period in history? While the vast majority of citizens were crushed, a select smart few Americans made fortunes. That’s because crisis, decline and collapse create great opportunity for those with vision, courage and a unique understanding of what is happening.

So how can you capitalize on this same scenario today? Much like the first Great Depression, we are about to experience “the greatest wealth transfer in world history.” You’ll need to get on the right side. You’ll need a detailed plan that will empower you to do better, even as the economy gets worse. And it will get worse -- Obama’s political policies guarantee that.

Crisis, decline and collapse create great opportunity for those with vision, courage and a unique understanding of what is happening.

The first thing going in our favor is that Obama is so predictable. He’s going to do what he’s always done: encourage more big government spending and massive cradle-to-grave entitlements. That much is clear as a bell.

Despite the president’s reckless policies and insane levels of spending and debt, your path to success is to create your own "Booming Personal Economy" in the midst of economic collapse. 

As I write in my new book, “The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide,” I turned to 18 of the smartest and richest superstars of business and finance for help. 

I was honored that the most talented and successful businessmen in America agreed to give my readers their valuable advice and game plan for the next four years.

Here's a small taste of what they told me:

First, let me demonstrate something: If you had invested $1 million in 1913 (kept your money in the bank, or put it under the mattress), your assets today would be worth about $40,000. But if you had instead invested in gold, your assets would be worth $87 million.

Our reckless and spendthrift politicians and inept government have let it happened again and again. 

In 1971 if you had invested the same $1 million in the dollar, today it’s worth $200,000. If you had chosen gold instead, you’d have about $47,000,000. How about the year 2000? Today your $1 million investment in the dollar would be worth $663,000. If you chose gold, it’s worth about $5,700,000.

The smartest bankers in the world concur. In 2012 Central Bankers of the world's industrialized nations bought more gold to protect their countries than in all the years since 1964 combined.  They know what my 18 business superstars know: bad times are coming. If you don't invest in precious metals to protect your assets, you are playing Russian Roulette with your family's future.

And now it’s the perfect time to buy… old and silver have had a large decline in the past week. Count your blessings. You can now buy at a big discount! 

The masses are (as usual) headed for disaster—panicking and selling gold at its lowest point in years…and crowding (like a herd of cattle) into stocks, bonds, and the U.S. dollar at their highest points. History suggests this is not a good move. My 18 millionaire and billionaire friends are using this drop in price to buy gold with both fists!

The superstars of finance also agree that you should do the following: 

- Move to a no tax state like Texas, Nevada, or Florida. Over the course of a typical 40-year working life you can save an extra $1,000,000 for your retirement, without actually earning one dollar more or working any harder. You save the extra money simply because you keep more of what you earned.

- Invest in energy stocks. Instead of complaining about the price of gas and heating your home, prosper from it!

- Invest in farmland and agriculture stocks. Instead of complaining about the dramatic rise in the price of food, prosper from it!

- Invest in medical real estate, and medical stocks. Instead of complaining about how much the government is wasting on ObamaCare, prosper from it!

- Invest in foreign stocks, bonds and real estate. You already have a home, a career, and a pension fund invested in America. It’s time to diversify. Obama was right about one thing: you must “spread your wealth around”—to countries that have lower taxes, more opportunity, better demographics, and a brighter future than America under Obama.

This is just the tip of the iceberg – and you'll need a very sturdy lifeboat to weather this storm. As I detail in my book “The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide, ” you’ll need an 18-point plan I call "Y-PODS" --  Your Personal Obama Defense Shield. These investment ideas will allow you to survive, thrive and prosper, even while many around you lose their jobs, assets, incomes and belief in themselves and America.

When it comes to Obama's economy, first get mad, then get even. This is how you do it!

Wayne Allyn Root is capitalist evangelist, entrepreneur, and Libertarian-conservative Republican. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee. Wayne's latest book is "The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide: Secrets to Protecting Your Family, Your Finances, and Your Freedom." For more, visit his website: www.ROOTforAmerica.com. Follow him on Twitter@WayneRoot.


View the original article here

How to make the perfect pretzel

  • Pretzel.JPG

If you're thinking about what snack to cook up today, no need to get all in a twist. 

National Pretzel Day is Friday. Even though you think it may take some genuine German blood coursing through your veins to pull off a feat like making pretzels at home, it's surprisingly easy.

But before you try, first a little history. Leave it the monks to perfect two of the best things in the culinary world: beer and pretzels. Legend has it that the first pretzel came from an Italian monastery monastery in around AD 610, when monks folded scraps of dough to resemble a child's arms folded in prayer. 

By the 16th century, the Germans started their own tradition of eating pretzels during Good Friday dinner. Then, pretzels were made only with flour and water, and instead of eggs, they were hidden during Easter festivities. 

Germans took those traditions to the U.S. when they immigrated a more than a century ago, and today it's believed that Americas eat 1 1/2 to 2 pounds of pretzels a year.  Not surprisingly, Philadelphians eat way more than that, and in 1983 years ago that Pennsylvania Rep. Robert S. Walker declared a commemorative day for pretzels. In 2003, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell had to remind people how good pretzels are when the holiday was re-declared.

So in commemoration of this auspicious day, make a pretzel.

Click here for the recipe.


View the original article here

In a first, black voter turnout rate passes whites

America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, reflecting a deeply polarized presidential election in which blacks strongly supported Barack Obama while many whites stayed home.

Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press.

Census data and exit polling show that whites and blacks will remain the two largest racial groups of eligible voters for the next decade. Last year's heavy black turnout came despite concerns about the effect of new voter-identification laws on minority voting, outweighed by the desire to re-elect the first black president.

"The 2012 turnout is a milestone for blacks and a huge potential turning point."

- Andra Gillespie, political science professor at Emory University

William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, analyzed the 2012 elections for the AP using census data on eligible voters and turnout, along with November's exit polling. He estimated total votes for Obama and Romney under a scenario where 2012 turnout rates for all racial groups matched those in 2004. Overall, 2012 voter turnout was roughly 58 percent, down from 62 percent in 2008 and 60 percent in 2004.

The analysis also used population projections to estimate the shares of eligible voters by race group through 2030. The numbers are supplemented with material from the Pew Research Center and George Mason University associate professor Michael McDonald, a leader in the field of voter turnout who separately reviewed aggregate turnout levels across states, as well as AP interviews with the Census Bureau and other experts. The bureau is scheduled to release data on voter turnout in May.

Overall, the findings represent a tipping point for blacks, who for much of America's history were disenfranchised and then effectively barred from voting until passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.

But the numbers also offer a cautionary note to both Democrats and Republicans after Obama won in November with a historically low percentage of white supporters. While Latinos are now the biggest driver of U.S. population growth, they still trail whites and blacks in turnout and electoral share, because many of the Hispanics in the country are children or noncitizens.

In recent weeks, Republican leaders have urged a "year-round effort" to engage black and other minority voters, describing a grim future if their party does not expand its core support beyond white males.

The 2012 data suggest Romney was a particularly weak GOP candidate, unable to motivate white voters let alone attract significant black or Latino support. Obama's personal appeal and the slowly improving economy helped overcome doubts and spur record levels of minority voters in a way that may not be easily replicated for Democrats soon.

Romney would have erased Obama's nearly 5 million-vote victory margin and narrowly won the popular vote if voters had turned out as they did in 2004, according to Frey's analysis. Then, white turnout was slightly higher and black voting lower.

More significantly, the battleground states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Florida and Colorado would have tipped in favor of Romney, handing him the presidency if the outcome of other states remained the same.

"The 2012 turnout is a milestone for blacks and a huge potential turning point," said Andra Gillespie, a political science professor at Emory University who has written extensively on black politicians.

 "What it suggests is that there is an `Obama effect' where people were motivated to support Barack Obama. But it also means that black turnout may not always be higher, if future races aren't as salient."

Whit Ayres, a GOP consultant who is advising GOP Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, a possible 2016 presidential contender, says the last election reaffirmed that the Republican Party needs "a new message, a new messenger and a new tone." Change within the party need not be "lock, stock and barrel," Ayres said, but policy shifts such as GOP support for broad immigration legislation will be important to woo minority voters over the longer term.

"It remains to be seen how successful Democrats are if you don't have Barack Obama at the top of the ticket," he added.

In Ohio, a battleground state where the share of eligible black voters is more than triple that of other minorities, 27-year-old Lauren Howie of Cleveland didn't start out thrilled with Obama in 2012. She felt he didn't deliver on promises to help students reduce college debt, promote women's rights and address climate change, she said. But she became determined to support Obama as she compared him with Romney.

"I got the feeling Mitt Romney couldn't care less about me and my fellow African-Americans," said Howie, an administrative assistant at Case Western Reserve University's medical school who is paying off college debt.

Howie said she saw some Romney comments as insensitive to the needs of the poor. "A white Mormon swimming in money with offshore accounts buying up companies and laying off their employees just doesn't quite fit my idea of a president," she said. "Bottom line, Romney was not someone I was willing to trust with my future."

The numbers show how population growth will translate into changes in who votes over the coming decade:

  --The gap between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black turnout in 2008 was the smallest on record, with voter turnout at 66.1 percent and 65.2 percent, respectively; turnout for Latinos and non-Hispanic Asians trailed at 50 percent and 47 percent. Rough calculations suggest that in 2012, 2 million to 5 million fewer whites voted compared with 2008, even though the pool of eligible white voters had increased.

  --Unlike other minority groups, the rise in voting for the slow-growing black population is due to higher turnout. While blacks make up 12 percent of the share of eligible voters, they represented 13 percent of total 2012 votes cast, according to exit polling. That was a repeat of 2008, when blacks "outperformed" their eligible voter share for the first time on record.

   --Latinos now make up 17 percent of the population but 11 percent of eligible voters, due to a younger median age and lower rates of citizenship and voter registration. Because of lower turnout, they represented just 10 percent of total 2012 votes cast. Despite their fast growth, Latinos aren't projected to surpass the share of eligible black voters until 2024, when each group will be roughly 13 percent. By then, 1 in 3 eligible voters will be nonwhite.

    --In 2026, the total Latino share of voters could jump to as high as 16 percent, if nearly 11 million immigrants here illegally become eligible for U.S. citizenship. Under a proposed bill in the Senate, those immigrants would have a 13-year path to citizenship. The share of eligible white voters could shrink to less than 64 percent in that scenario. An estimated 80 percent of immigrants here illegally, or 8.8 million, are Latino, although not all will meet the additional requirements to become citizens.

"The 2008 election was the first year when the minority vote was important to electing a U.S. president. By 2024, their vote will be essential to victory," Frey said. "Democrats will be looking at a landslide going into 2028 if the new Hispanic voters continue to favor Democrats."

Even with demographics seeming to favor Democrats in the long term, it's unclear whether Obama's coalition will hold if blacks or younger voters become less motivated to vote or decide to switch parties.

Minority turnout tends to drop in midterm congressional elections, contributing to larger GOP victories as happened in 2010, when House control flipped to Republicans.

The economy and policy matter. Exit polling shows that even with Obama's re-election, voter support for a government that does more to solve problems declined from 51 percent in 2008 to 43 percent last year, bolstering the view among Republicans that their core principles of reducing government are sound.

The party's "Growth and Opportunity Project" report released last month by national leaders suggests that Latinos and Asians could become more receptive to GOP policies once comprehensive immigration legislation is passed.

Whether the economy continues its slow recovery also will shape voter opinion, including among blacks, who have the highest rate of unemployment.

Since the election, optimism among nonwhites about the direction of the country and the economy has waned, although support for Obama has held steady. In an October AP-GfK poll, 63 percent of nonwhites said the nation was heading in the right direction; that's dropped to 52 percent in a new AP-GfK poll. Among non-Hispanic whites, however, the numbers are about the same as in October, at 28 percent.

Democrats in Congress merit far lower approval ratings among nonwhites than does the president, with 49 percent approving of congressional Democrats and 74 percent approving of Obama.

William Galston, a former policy adviser to President Bill Clinton, says that in previous elections where an enduring majority of voters came to support one party, the president winning re-election -- William McKinley in 1900, Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936 and Ronald Reagan in 1984 -- attracted a larger turnout over his original election and also received a higher vote total and a higher share of the popular vote. None of those occurred for Obama in 2012.

Only once in the last 60 years has a political party been successful in holding the presidency more than eight years -- Republicans from 1980-1992.

"This doesn't prove that Obama's presidency won't turn out to be the harbinger of a new political order," Galston says. "But it does warrant some analytical caution."

Early polling suggests that Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton could come close in 2016 to generating the level of support among nonwhites as Obama did in November, when he won 80 percent of their vote. In a Fox News poll in February, 75 percent of nonwhites said they thought Clinton would make a good president, outpacing the 58 percent who said that about Vice President Joe Biden.

Benjamin Todd Jealous, president of the NAACP, predicts closely fought elections in the near term and worries that GOP-controlled state legislatures will step up efforts to pass voter ID and other restrictions to deter blacks and other minorities from voting. In 2012, African-Americans were able to turn out in large numbers only after a very determined get-out-the-vote effort by the Obama campaign and black groups, he said.

Jealous says the 2014 midterm election will be the real bellwether for black turnout. "Black turnout set records this year despite record attempts to suppress the black vote," he said.


View the original article here

Obama to nominate Charlotte Mayor Foxx as next Transportation secretary

  • Foxx_mayor.jpg

    FILE: August 31, 2012: Charlotte Mayor Anthony Foxx speaks during an open house for the public to view the venue for the Democratic National Convention at Time Warner Cable arena in Charlotte, N.C.REUTERS

President Obama will nominate Charlotte, N.C., Mayor Anthony Foxx on Monday to be his next secretary of Transportation, the White House said Sunday.

“As mayor of one of America’s most vibrant cities, Anthony Foxx knows firsthand that investing in world-class infrastructure is vital to creating good jobs and ensuring American businesses can grow and compete in the global economy,” the White House said in a statement.

As Charlotte mayor, Foxx, a Democrat, led efforts to improve the city’s transit infrastructure.

He was elected mayor in 2009 and was re-elected in 2011.

Foxx was a member of the Charlotte City Council from 2005 to 2009.

The former private-practice lawyer is a graduate of Davidson College and earned a law degree from New York University.

Foxx is Obama's first black nominee among the new Cabinet members appointed for the second term. The president faced criticism early in his second term for a lack of diversity among his nominees.

He will replace Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who said in January that he would not stay for a second Obama term.

The official insisted on anonymity to avoid public discussion of the pick before the official announcement.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Stolen 'Pulp Fiction' car found 19 years later

Authorities say the classic Chevrolet convertible featured in the film "Pulp Fiction" has been found nearly two decades after it was stolen.

The San Bernardino County Sun reports movie director Quentin Tarantino's 1964 Chevelle Malibu was recovered in the San Francisco Bay area earlier this week.

John Travolta's character drove the cherry red car in the movie.

Sheriff's Sgt. Albert Anolin said an investigation into an old Malibu in the desert city of Victorville on April 18 led detectives to another Malibu in the Oakland area. They then confirmed that vehicle belonged to Tarantino and was reported stolen in 1994.

Authorities say the car's current owner is not believed to be involved in its theft and is considered to be a victim of a fraud.

A message seeking Tarantino's comment was not immediately returned.


View the original article here

Manchin says he's working to get another Senate vote on gun background check

  • Toomey_Manchin.jpg

    FILE: April 10, 2013: Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., left, and Patrick Toomey, R-Pa., announce a deal on gun-control legislation, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C.AP

West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin said Sunday he’s not finished with his effort to expand background checks for gun buyers, despite the proposal’s defeat and other key senators appearing to now move beyond the issue.

Manchin told “Fox News Sunday” that he’s going to rework the proposal to get it back to the Senate floor.

“We’re going to work this bill with all of our hearts,” he told Fox News.

Manchin was joined by Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Pat Toomey in crafting the background check proposal, in part to get bipartisan support for the largely Democratic gun-control plan, following a mass shooting in December 2012 in which 20 first-graders were killed.

However, the proposal to expand the check to online sales and gun shows was shelved earlier this month when it got just 54 of the required 60 Senate votes.

On Friday, Toomey said he had no plans to revive the proposal.

"My own view is very simple: The Senate has had its vote. We've seen the outcome of that vote. I am not aware of any reason to believe that if we had the vote again that we'd have a different outcome," he said, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer.

Manchin told Fox: “I don’t think he’s done.”

He also said he has spoken with fellow gun owners who appear to support legislation that would keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and the severe mentally ill.

Manchin said “law-abiding citizens” support background checks, and he urged Americans to read the proposal, then tell him what parts they don’t like.  

Senate Majority Harry Reid said days after the defeat of the Manchin-Toomey proposal that he has “hit pause” on efforts to pass comprehensive gun-control legislation. 

He said last week the proposal remains a work in progress but no action is being taken now.


View the original article here

Boeing says new battery system ensures 787 Dreamliner safety

  • boeingbattsafety12.jpg

    Aug. 26, 2011: A 787 Dreamliner sits on the tarmac at Boeing Commercial Airplanes manufacturing facilities at Paine Field, Everett, Washington during the jetliner's certification event.Reuters

Boeing Co.'s chief engineer for the 787 Dreamliner said Saturday that changes to the lithium-ion battery system are fully sufficient to ensure the aircraft's safety, although the company has been unable to find the cause of the original battery failures earlier this year that led to groundings of the plane worldwide since mid-January.

Michael Sinnett gave a briefing on the revamped battery to reporters in Tokyo after Japanese and U.S. regulators gave carriers permission to resume 787 flights once battery modifications are made.

The new battery system is designed to prevent a fire, and to contain one should it occur with an "enclosure," a casing around the battery to prevent heat from being released in the aircraft, Sinnett told a news conference in Tokyo.

"Even if we never know root cause, the enclosure keeps the airplane safe, it eliminates the possibility of fire, it keeps heat out of the airplane, it keeps smoke out of the airplane, and it ensures that no matter what happens to the battery, regardless of root cause, the airplane is safe," he said, adding "in some ways it almost doesn't matter what the root cause was."

He said Boeing has identified over 80 potential causal factors and addressed all of them in the new design.

The 50 Dreamliner jets in service worldwide were grounded in mid-January after incidents with smoldering batteries occurred aboard two different planes, leading to hundreds of cancelled flights and revenue losses.

Japan's two biggest carriers have the most 787s -- All Nippon Airways owns 17 of the jets, while Japan Airlines has seven. They have begun installing the new batteries over the last week, and airline officials said commercial flights would resume around June as the safety improvements are expected to take several weeks to finish.

It takes five days to completely retrofit one airplane, Sinnett said, and repairs to nine jets are almost complete. New batteries are being shipped from Japanese battery maker GS Yuasa to the airlines, he said.

ANA is planning to conduct a test flight using a modified Dreamliner in Japan on Sunday.

The only U.S. airline using the 787 is United Airlines, which owns six.

Japan is mandating additional safety measures including one test flight after the new system is installed. Operators will need to monitor the new battery system during flight and authorities will require airlines to conduct a detailed sampling inspection of the batteries after a certain period of use.

Special training for all on board personnel including the pilot on 787s is mandated, and airlines are to disclose information on safety measures taken on the 787 to the public.

Boeing has 840 purchase orders of the plane so far.

Sinnett declined to comment on cost for repairs worldwide. He plans to meet with executives from ANA and JAL during his Japan trip.


View the original article here

New video shows Egyptian police allowing deadly attack on Coptic cathedral

Newly-emerged video appears to show Egyptian police standing idly by - and even helping attackers during a deadly assault earlier this month on a Coptic cathedral where Christians were mourning five men killed in an earlier clash with Muslims.

The video shot April 7 and first obtained by MidEast Christian News, shows a men shooting guns, wielding machetes and hurling stones and possibly Molotov cocktails as mourners carry caskets out of St. Mark’s Coptic Orthodox Cathedral in the Abbassia District of Cairo as uniformed police watch, unmoving. At one point, a police officer appears to help a gunman take aim at a courtyard full of mourners who had spilled out of the church. The attack left two Copts dead and another 84 people injured, including 11 police officers.

"There is a general feeling among citizens about the absence of law and the prestige of the state."

- Report on religious vilence in Egypt

When it was over, the only arrests made were of four Copts. Christians, who were already outraged over a three-day attack that began April 4 attack in Khosous which saw the four men killed and homes, a nursery and a church burned, said the events show how elusive justice is for Christians, who make up about 10 percent of the nation's population.

"Two Copts were killed during the attack on the Cathedral; four more died in Khosous, yet not one of their attackers has been arrested," said Andrew Johnston, advocacy director for Christian Solidarity Worldwide. “These arrests come at a time when the Coptic community in Egypt is still coming to terms with an unprecedented attack on the headquarters of the Coptic Orthodox Church and the violence in Khosous. Such discrepancies in the discharge of justice contribute to impunity, and can only foster more sectarianism.”

Tensions between Egypt's Christians and the majority Sunni Muslims have grown dramatically since President Hosni Mubarak was ousted in 2011 and replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood-led government of Mohammed Morsi.

"There is a general feeling among citizens about the absence of law and the prestige of the state," said a report released Wednesday by the Egyptian National Council for Human Rights. "Such a feeling could push the citizens to the violence and sectarianism without fearing from any deterrence, " reads a passage from the report.

"The recent incident proved the shrinking of the role of the state to control the actions of the individuals especially those people who think that they talk on the behalf of God," the report continued. "There is a need for implementing the law strictly to treat such incidents.”


View the original article here

Marine biologists investigating cause of sick sea lion pups

Marine biologists are at a loss as to why an unprecedented number of sea lion pups are turning up near death along Southern California's coastline.

Since the beginning of the year, some 1,400 young California sea lions were admitted to rehabilitation centers across the state, according to Sarah Wilkin, the marine mammal stranding coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Wilkin said that figure is five times the normal rate of beached pups for this time of year.

"Nobody was quite prepared for the scope of this," said Wilkin. "The major common factor for all these stranded pups is that they're coming in emaciated, dehydrated, basically starving. They have been unable to find enough food to sustain themselves."

As to why they are not getting enough of the fish they need for both nutrition and hydration is still unclear. But what is clear to marine biologists is this beaching epidemic only affects the young. Most of the sick sea lions were born last summer.

"The pups can't dive as deep," said Wilkin. "They can't travel as far so they might be more impacted in even just a slight change in the distribution of prey."

NOAA has taken an extraordinary step by declaring this an "unusual mortality event" to receive additional funding for rehabilitation and research.

"The numbers speak for themselves," said David Bard with the Marine Mammal Care Center at Fort MacArthur in San Pedro, Calif. "As far as the underlying causes, anything that I can tell you would be a guess."

Typically, Bard's facility receives between 50 and 80 animals in the first quarter of the year. So far in 2013, it has treated more than 400.

"What we started seeing since January is animals coming in at roughly half the weight that they should be," said Bard. "You can see their shoulder blades, you can see their spines."

SeaWorld San Diego reports similar figures. Spokesperson Dave Koontz said its rehab facility has treated more than 300 animals in 2013, a number that also includes elephant and harbor seals. Koontz says that's more in the first four months of 2013 than in 2011 and 2012 combined.

Wilkin says the NOAA is working with fishery scientists and oceanographers to pinpoint the exact cause. Besides food shortages, they are also exploring other theories including exposure to biotoxins, disease and human pollutants. They are even looking into possible radiation contamination from Japan's Fukushima nuclear power plant meltdown following the 2011 tsunami.

But regardless the reason, Wilkin said this could be a sign of something more troubling in the waters off the coast of California.

"We consider marine mammals usually as sentinels," Wilkin said. "By investigating causes that are impacting them, we do a lot of times get information that in turn can impact us. We eat a lot of the same fish species. We are using the oceans for similar ways so what we learn from them does play into our health."

Early findings indicate that the year has been relatively neutral in regards to ocean conditions, including temperature, according to Wilkin. So far, the California seal lion pup is the only marine mammal being affected in such a way.


View the original article here

Be a mean mom -- protect your child from cyberbullying

If you're the parent of a teean, you have witnessed this scenario at your own kitchen table, I’m sure. Less talking. More texting. Virtual conversations, whether via smart phones or social media, consume our kids’ existence. 

Our children’s social lives are no longer played out at home and at school, where adults are present, but now inhabit dark corners of the Internet. As parents, we want to believe these are harmless digital exchanges with their school friends — but what if they’re not?

Over 85 percent of teenagers online have been “cyberbullied,” according to Pew Internet. The most common form of cyberbullying is wide distribution of intimate information to the public.

Having private text messages forwarded without consent or having an embarrassing picture posted on Facebook without permission can lead to a tidal wave of emotional and verbal abuse. Now anyone and everyone can provoke a cyber attack without fear of consequences, or so it would seem.  

Go on. Be a mean mom or dad, and find out what your kids are doing online or on their phones. It just might save your child’s life.

But the consequences are very real. According to the Cyberbulling Research Center, virtual attacks result in teenage depression, low self-esteem — and worse — suicide.  

Take the beautiful 15-year-old teenage girl from California, Audrie Pott, who police say was raped while unconscious at a party. 

Tragically, Audrie hanged herself eight days after her attackers posted humiliating photos of her on social media. Right before committing suicide, Audrie posted on Facebook, “My life is ruined. ... The whole school knows. ... My life is over. ...” Three 16-year-old boys have been arrested and are being prosecuted in a wrongful death suit, which basically aims to prove that the evil actions of these three teenage boys led to the death of Audrie Pott.

In the wake of Audrie’s case, Canadian police have reopened the case of Rehtaeh Parsons, another teen girl who committed suicide after photos of her alleged sexual assault went viral

And, of course, we cannot forget about the brave rape victim in Stuebenville, Ohio, who is currently seeking justice not just against her convicted rapist but also against the high school football players who filmed the attack and bragged about it by spreading the footage throughout the Web. 

Hopefully, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine’s investigation of both kids and adults involved will culminate in other much-deserved convictions.

But here’s my question: If social media is known as a tremendous problem among our teens, then what are adults going to do to protect them?

Twitter has done a good job providing a “Safety Tips for Parents” page that aims to educate parents on parental blocks.  Other researchers are working on apps and algorithms to detect and report bullying online. But these efforts cannot go far enough.  

Think about it. Parents are legally responsible for their children until they reach adulthood.  

Therefore, shouldn’t they be expected to know what’s going on with their own kids in cyberspace? While you cannot always read over your kids’ shoulders, you can keep the lines of communication open. 

A wise teacher named Erin Kurt asked her students the same questions every year for over 16 years, and from these responses she learned, “The Top 10 Things Kids Want from Parents.” At the top of the list, most kids just want their parents to sit and talk with them privately. When was the last time you sat down face to face with your child and asked them, “What is going on in your life, and are you all right?”

Beyond open discussions, watch for signs of changed behavior. A teenager’s body language, words, changes in eating and sleep habits, and a drastic drop in grades can all be indications that your child is facing bullying. Silence often makes a powerful statement.

If your child is being cyberbullied, get the passwords and usernames of their social media and e-mail accounts. 

Block users who are harassing your child. If threats persist, screenshot hateful posts and pictures and reach out to other parents, schools, and eventually law enforcement. 

Above all, validate their feelings and respect their struggles, no matter how seemingly harmless.   

Take a moment to remember how hard it is to be a kid, and then multiply that by about a thousand. We have no idea what they are really up against in today’s culture.

These tactics might seem extreme, but it is our duty as moms and dads to protect our children — sometimes even from themselves.  

I tell my 16-year-old daughter all the time that social media is not a right; it’s a privilege.  After all, my husband and I pay the cell phone bill and own the laptops.  And as parents, we love our children unconditionally, and we want to save them from immense suffering.  

We are the first line of defense, not the school, not the government.

Finally, pray for your kids every day.  As much as we love them, God loves them more. I routinely pray for His protection and also, oddly, for me to catch them if they mess up, so we can correct them and set them immediately on the right path.

Go on. Be a mean mom or dad, and find out what your kids are doing online or on their phones. It just might save your child’s life.

Penny Young Nance is president and CEO of Concerned Women for America.


View the original article here

Bombing shifts Mass. Senate race before primaries Tuesday

Even before the explosions, polling suggested that Massachusetts voters weren't excited about the looming special election to replace former U.S. Sen. John Kerry.

But in the days after bombs ripped through the Boston Marathon's crowded streets, politics were all but forgotten as authorities launched an unprecedented manhunt and a region grappled with terror. It didn't matter that competitive primary contests were 15 days away; everything was put on hold.

"There are things that are more important than campaigning and that horrific event was clearly one of them," said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey, who is competing against U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch for the Democratic nomination to replace Kerry, now the secretary of state.

After suspending political activities for roughly a week, the candidates have been forced to walk a delicate balance as they engage voters ahead of Tuesday's Republican and Democratic primaries. They have largely avoided the site of the attack out of sensitivity for victims, but some have tweaked campaign advertising to address the bombing, highlighted their national security credentials and tried to use the sudden focus on terrorism to shift the direction of the race.

The general election, featuring the primary winners, is scheduled for June 25.

"It completely changed the landscape," Lynch aide Scott Ferson said of the bombing.

Indeed, a campaign once dominated by debates about the environment, health care and women's rights has become more focused on enemy combatants, Miranda rights and counterterrorism agencies. Some candidates welcomed the shift.

On the Democratic side, Lynch has seized on national security in recent days to attack Markey, thought to be the front-runner. One of the most memorable moments in last week's Democratic debate, just a week after the bombing, focused on support for federal security efforts

"Unlike my colleague Mr. Markey, I've actually voted for the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bills," Lynch charged.

Markey responded: "He's taking a page right out of the Karl Rove swift boat playbook, and it's very sad, especially just one week after what just happened in Boston, Cambridge and Watertown."

Through Tuesday's primary election, Markey outspent Lynch on television advertising $1.7 million to $1.2 million, according to advertising figures obtained by The Associated Press. But only Lynch focused on the bombings in a television ad that blanketed the state last week, while Markey focused on traditional Democratic priorities such as women's reproductive rights.

"We hold in our hearts those we lost, but we will get through this together and work toward a brighter day," Lynch says in the campaign ad.

But Lynch was forced to distance himself last week from a so-called robo-call made on his behalf by the leader of an ironworkers' union, who mentions the bombings while encouraging voters to support someone who "understands the day-to-day problems facing working families." It was an awkward moment for the Lynch campaign, which called on the group to stop the calls.

But it's unclear how many people were paying attention.

"The bombings basically sucked all the air out of the room," said Steve Koczela, president of MassINC Polling Group, which found last month that more than 40 percent of likely Democratic voters and nearly 50 percent of likely Republican voters hadn't settled on a candidate.

"It just doesn't seem like -- even as of the last poll -- people were really paying attention to who was running," Koczela continued. "There's room for any of the candidates to make a move."

On the Republican side in particular, the recent violence shifted the contours of the contest.

GOP candidate Gabriel Gomez, a former Navy SEAL, finished running the marathon minutes before the bombs exploded along the finish line, killing three and injuring more than 200.

Like other candidates, Gomez immediately pulled television ads off the air and suspended campaign activities. He said he was focused on being respectful as he eased back into campaigning the following weekend.

"We can't let the terrorists win and completely suspend what is fundamental right in the United States," Gomez said.

He charged that President Barack Obama's administration should have designated 19-year-old suspect Dzhohkar Tsarnaev an "enemy combatant" and tried him outside the traditional criminal justice system.

Another GOP candidate, Mike Sullivan, says the federal government should have denied Tsarnaev his Miranda rights, tried him as an enemy combatant and revoked his U.S. citizenship.

"Our first concern must always be preventing future terrorist acts against our people," said Sullivan, a former U.S. attorney whose campaign has been reminding people that he previously led the prosecution of shoe bomber Richard Reid.

Republican candidate Dan Winslow, a former judge and chief legal counsel under former Gov. Mitt Romney, said the entire GOP field has experience with national security.

"We've got a Navy SEAL, a former prosecutor and a former judge all in the field for Republicans," Winslow said. "I think we all have our own credentials. The key is, Who's got the better ideas? Who's got the better electability in June?"

The key may also be which candidate can convince his supporters to get to the polls as the bombing continues to dominate attention in Massachusetts. State officials were already predicting a low turnout, likely less than 20 percent of eligible voters, even before the attack.

Wendy Becker, 45, of Newton, was among the thousands who visited the bomb site in Copley Square late last week. A registered voter, she said she didn't know the primaries were happening so soon.

"I didn't even know it was Tuesday and haven't cared," she said, noting that her little brother and brother-in-law ran in the marathon. She's been glued to the television coverage of the aftermath even since.


View the original article here

What's next from Pope Francis?

If Pope Francis I’s success were to be rated for style alone, the new leader of the Roman Catholic Church is off the charts. The College of Cardinals could not have chosen a man more appealing to the world – to Catholic and non-Catholics alike.

His warm, disarmingly open demeanor, along with his apparent willingness to break with convention, have brought him converts of the popular sort. The former archbishop of Buenos Aires, Jose Mario Bergoglio, has been changing minds for some time. He is embraced by unassailable defenders all around, religious leaders, human rights figures among them.

But as the new pope settles in to his job,  the question now is whether style will convert into an ability to handle substantive issues that have not gone away. The pope takes over at a trying time for the church – observance among Catholics is shrinking, and faith is shattered by the unresolved child sexual abuse scandal.

Pope Francis also has to contend with an administrative mess at the Vatican that prelates acknowledge has been a legacy of two popes who –whatever their qualities—were cerebral and hands off when confronted with bureaucracy. In particular, he faces a scandal at the Vatican Bank, which is awash with charges of mismanagement and corruption. The hope among priests is that he will work out the problems and that the pope’s sympathetic touch will be a great boon for the fortunes of the church and beyond.

Francis I appears to be onto something. A pope with a moral message carries enormous weight in the world – it has been so since the dawn of modern communications. I’ve just written a book "The Pope’s Last Crusade"--about the little-known Pope Pius XI, who inaugurated Vatican Radio in 1931 and raised his voice against Hitler and Mussolini. He became an icon of opposition to Fascism in Europe at a time when all other media there were censored.

Then, as now, Jewish leaders and others were praising the pope as an advocate for human rights.

Similarly, decades later, I was present when Pope John Paul II visited Chile in 1987 when visited during the Pinochet regime and called for justice. The pope can offer hope beyond the confines of the church.

Now, just as then, however, the pope will have to speak up and change minds. Francis is riding with good will and an expectation he will succeed.

The Reverend James Martin, a well-known Jesuit in the United States says that this is a perfect moment for such an unassuming, iconoclastic pope. He says the choice of the first Latin American and first Jesuit pope represents a sea change for the Catholic Church.

"It is a recognition that the center of gravity in the church has shifted,” he told me. “It is an immense turning point for the Catholic Church.”

There is a potential difficulty for the church, though. He is not expected to offer any major doctrinal changes, especially concerning the most controversial areas some members of the church are looking for. Don’t expect new declarations about celibacy among priests, or bringing women to the priesthood, or changes in the view of abortion and contraception.

In particular, the pope indicated this that he has no intention of changing his predecessor’s decision to order a crackdown on the largest assembly of U.S. nuns, who were judged to be challenging the Vatican’s conservative line and promoting “radical social themes.”

It remains to be seen whether his style and personal appeal will win points despite such controversies. The pope is pointing to an all-inclusive church – reaching out to other denominations and stressing concern for the poor.

Francis made contact with religious leaders of other faiths even before his installation. Key among his guests at that ceremony, for example, to highlight the immediate change was Batholome I, the head of the Eastern Orthodox Church. It was the first time a leader of his group had attended the installation of a Roman Catholic pope in 1,000 years.

The pope also won praise from Rabbi Abraham Skorka, a prominent Jewish leader in Argentina; they wrote a book together, On Heaven and Earth. Relations also have thawed quickly with Muslims, who had strained contacts with Pope Benedict XVI. Sumer Noufouri, the secretary general of the Islamic Center of Buenos Aires, told the Washington Post that the new pope “is a person who listens and who knows Islam. (It is) an opportunity for a fresh start in relations…”

In the final analysis, said Father Martin, the immediate acceptance of the pope is a matter of spirit.

“Holiness is naturally attractive to people,” he said.  “It is glimpsing the divine.”
                  
Little more than a month after the start of his papacy, Francis has shown that he intends to come across as a pope for all seasons.

Peter Eisner has been an editor and reporter at the Washington Post, Newsday and the Associated Press. He is the author of the new book "The Pope's Last Crusade: How an American Jesuit Helped Pope Pius XI's Campaign to Stop Hitler" (William Morrow 2013). For more visit his website: www.petereisner.com


View the original article here

What made the Titanic band keep playing, even as ship sank?

  • 030912_al_titanic_640.jpg
  • Britain Titanic Violin23.jpg

    In this undated photo provided by Henry Aldridge shows the violin that was played by the bandmaster of the Titanic as the oceanliner sank, Devizes, England.AP

  • 06-titanic-iceberg.JPG

    Nov. 28, 2012: Is this a photograph of the iceberg that did the unthinkable: sinking the RMS Titanic? On April 12, 1912, Captain W. F. Wood aboard the steamer S. S. Etonian photographed a massive iceberg with a distinctive elliptical shape. Wood found the picture remarkable enough to print it out and annotate it with the current latitude and longitude. Two days later, on April 14, the unsinkable Titanic struck an iceberg and sank to bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. That iceberg had the same elliptical shape, according to sketches made on the ship. Wood had captured the remarkable piece of ice, said Craig Sophin, a Titanic expert and consultant to the auctioneers.RR Auction

  • New Titanic Auction 4.jpg

    Charles Lightoller Letter, The ships highest ranking surviving officer recounts his final words with Dr. Simpson and other officers We merely exchanged the words Goodbye, old man. This occurred shortly before the end.RR Auction

Since writing my book, “The Band That Played On: The Extraordinary Story of the 8 Musicians Who Went Down with the Titanic”, the most frequent question I’ve been asked is why the Titanic’s eight musicians continued to play on the deck even as the ship was going down. Were they told to do so by the Captain? Was it part of their job description? Did they think they would be saved?

While doing research for my book "The Band That Played On," I discovered that the band’s musicians were not employees of the White Star Line. They were employed by a Liverpool music agency that was in turn paid by the ship. 

This arrangement was to impact on the dependents of the musicians who found, after the disaster, that they weren’t entitled to the compensation due to the relatives of those who signed the ship’s articles.

I believe the band took the courageous decision to play because of the moral character of their leader, the violinist Wallace Hartley.

As they weren’t ship’s employees they would have had the same rights as any passenger to leave the ship by the lifeboats supplied. The Captain could have recommended that they play, but he couldn’t have ordered them to do so.

I believe the band took the courageous decision to play because of the moral character of their leader, the violinist Wallace Hartley. This musician, who’d previously played on both the Mauretania and the Lusitania, was from the small town of Colne in Lancashire, England, and was raised in the Methodist church. His father was the choirmaster there and responsible for introducing the hymn ‘Nearer, My God, to Thee’ to the congregation.

By all accounts Hartley was a highly principled person and a devout Christian. He’d recently been engaged to a young Christian girl, Maria Robinson, and they planned to marry after he’d completed a few trips on the Titanic. He was personable, cheerful and would always attend church when he was back on land.

There are two interesting comments that he made to colleagues that shed some light on why he behaved as he did. The first was mentioned by a musician on the Celtic called John Carr who had worked with Hartley. I don’t suppose he (Hartley) waited to be sent for, but after finding how dangerous the situation was he probably called his men together and began playing,” said Carr. “ I know he often said that music was a bigger weapon for stopping disorder than anything on earth. He knew the value of the weapon he had, and I think he proved his point.”

The second was said to Ellwand Moody, a musician on the Mauretania, who had served under Hartley. He told a British newspaper; “I remember one day I asked him what he would do if he were ever on a sinking ship and he replied ‘I don’t think I would do better than play ‘Oh God Our Help in Ages Past’ or ‘Nearer, My God, to Thee’.”

So it appears almost certain that Wallace Hartley had contemplated being on a sinking ship and had already decided how he would respond. He believed that music could prevent panic and create calm. He had also chosen his final piece of music.

I didn’t discover any stories from the lives of these musicians that led me to think that they were born with the gene of courage. As with most people who perform heroic acts I suspect they didn’t know what they were made of until the moment came when they had to reveal it. But I also think that without the moral and spiritual caliber of Wallace Hartley, the man to whom they looked for musical guidance, they may not have discovered their inner resources.

Steve Turner is a freelance journalist and author of "The Band That Played On: The Extraordinary Story of the 8 Musicians Who Went Down with the Titanic" (Thomas Nelson 2011).


View the original article here